Derivation of aquatic predicted no-effect concentration (PNEC) for 2,4-dichlorophenol: Comparing native species data with non-native species data

Chemosphere

Volumn 84, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 1506-1511

  Jin, Xiaowei ^a   Zha, Jinmiao ^a   Xu, Yiping ^a   Wang, Zijian ^a   Kumaran, Satyanarayanan Senthil ^b  

^a RESEARCH CENTER FOR ECO ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES   (China)

^b BHARATHIAR UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

2,4 Dichlorophenol; Chronic toxicity; Native species; Predicted no effect concentration; Species sensitivity distribution

Indexed keywords

TOXICITY;

2 ,4-DICHLOROPHENOL; CHRONIC TOXICITY; NATIVE SPECIES; PREDICTED NO-EFFECT CONCENTRATIONS; SPECIES SENSITIVITY DISTRIBUTIONS;

POPULATION DISTRIBUTION;

2,4 DICHLOROPHENOL; CHLOROPHYLL;

CHEMICAL POLLUTANT; CHLOROPHYLL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CRUSTACEAN; ENDOCRINE DISRUPTOR; GROWTH RATE; NATIVE SPECIES; SURVIVAL; TOXICITY;

ALLORCHESTES COMPRESSA; AQUATIC SPECIES; ARTICLE; BUFO BUFO GARGARIZANS; CALANOIDA; CALCULATION; CAMBARIDAEA; CAMBARUS ROBUSTUS; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; CORBICULA FLUMINEA; CTENOPHARYNGODON IDELLUS; DAPHNIA; ECOTOXICITY; ERYTHROCULTER ILISHAEFORMIS; GOBIOCYPRIS RARUS; GOLDFISH; GROWTH INHIBITION; LEMNA GIBBA; MACROBRACHIUM SUPERBUM; MYLOPHARYNGODON PICEUS; NONHUMAN; ORCONECTES PROPINQUUS; ORYZIAS; PIMEPHALES PROMELAS; PLAGIOGNATHOPS MICROLEPIS; RAINBOW TROUT; SCENDESMUS OBLIQUUS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SOIRODELA POLYRHIZA; SPECIES COMPARISON; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION; SURVIVAL; UNIO TUMIDUS;

CORBICULA FLUMINEA; ERYTHROCULTER ILISHAEFORMIS; INVERTEBRATA; MACROBRACHIUM SUPERBUM; MICROLEPIS; MYLOPHARYNGODON PICEUS; PISCES; POLYRHIZA;

EID: 79961208741     PISSN: 00456535     EISSN: 18791298     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.04.033     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Aldenberg T., Jaworska J.S. Uncertainty of the hazardous concentration and fraction affected for normal species sensitivity distributions. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2000, 46:1-18.
2. Aldenberg T., Slob W. Confidence-limits for hazardous concentrations based on logistically distributed NOEC toxicity data. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 1993, 25:48-63.
3. Amorim M.J.B., Oliveira E., Soares A.M.V.M., Scott-Fordsmand J.J. Predicted no effect concentration (PNEC) for triclosan to terrestrial species (invertebrates and plants). Environ. Int. 2010, 36:338-343.
4. ANZECC&ARMCANZ, 2000. Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality. Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council and Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand, Canberra, Australia.
5. ASTM, 1993. Standard Guide for Conducting Acute Toxicity Tests with Fishes, Macroinvertebrates and Amphibians. Annual Book of ASTM Standards. American Society of Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, USA, pp. 88-729.
6. Besser J.M., Wang N., Dwyer F.J., Mayer F.L., Ingersoll C.G. Assessing contaminant sensitivity of endangered and threatened aquatic species: part II. Chronic toxicity of copper and pentachlorophenol to two endangered species and two surrogate species. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2005, 48:155-165.
7. Brix K.V., DeForest D.K., Adams W.J. Assessing acute and chronic copper risks to freshwater aquatic life using species sensitivity distributions for different taxonomic groups. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2001, 20:1846-1856.
8. Caldwell D.J., Mastrocco F., Hutchinson T.H., Lange R., Heijerick D., Janssen C., Anderson P.D., Sumpter J.P. Derivation of an aquatic predicted no-effect concentration for the synthetic hormone, 17 alpha-ethinyl estradiol. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42:7046-7054.
9. Chapman P.M., Fairbrother A., Brown D. A critical evaluation of safety (uncertainty) factors for ecological risk assessment. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1998, 17:99-108.
10. Crane M., Newman M.C. What level of effect is a no observed effect?. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2000, 19:516-519.
11. Crossland N.O. A method to evaluate effects of toxic chemicals on fish growth. Chemosphere 1985, 14:1855-1870.
12. Czaplicka M. Sources and transformations of chlorophenols in the natural environment. Sci. Total Environ. 2004, 322:21-39.
13. Davies P.E., Cook L.S.J., Goenarso D. Sublethal responses to pesticides of several species of Australian fresh-water fish and crustaceans and rainbow-trout. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1994, 13:1341-1354.
14. Dyer S.D., Belanger S.E., Carr G.J. An initial evaluation of the use of Euro/North American fish species for tropical effects assessments. Chemosphere 1997, 35:2767-2781.
15. ECB, 2003. Technical Guidance Document on Risk Assessment in Support of Commission Directive 93/67/EEC on Risk Assessment for New Notified Substances, Commission Regulation (EC) No. 1488/94 on Risk Assessment for Existing Substances, Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council Concerning the Placing of Biocidal Products on the Market. Part II. Environmental Risk Assessment. European Chemicals Bureau, European Commission Joint Research Center, European Communities.
16. Gao J.J., Liu L.H., Liu X.R., Zhou H.D., Huang S.B., Wang Z.J. Levels and spatial distribution of chlorophenols 2,4-dichlorophenol, 2,4,6-trichlorophenol, and pentachlorophenol in surface water of China. Chemosphere 2008, 71:1181-1187.
17. Garay V., Roman G., Isnard P. Evaluation of PNEC values: extrapolation from microtox (R), algae, daphnid, and fish data to HC5. Chemosphere 2000, 40:267-273.
18. Hampel M., Gonzalez-Mazo E., Vale C., Blasco J. Derivation of predicted no effect concentrations (PNEC) for marine environmental risk assessment: application of different approaches to the model contaminant linear alkylbenzene sulphonates (LAS) in a site-specific environment. Environ. Int. 2007, 33:486-491.
19. Hose G.C., Van den Brink P.J. Confirming the species-sensitivity distribution concept for endosulfan using laboratory, mesocosm, and field data. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2004, 47:511-520.
20. House W.A., Leach D., Long J.L.A., Cranwell P., Smith C., Bharwaj L., Meharg A., Ryland G., Orr D.O., Wright J. Micro-organic compounds in the Humber rivers. Sci. Total Environ. 1997, 194:357-371.
21. Isnard P., Flammarion P., Roman G., Babut M., Bastien P., Bintein S., Essermeant L., Ferard J.F., Gallotti-Schmitt S., Saouter E., Saroli M., Thiebaud H., Tomassone R., Vindimian E. Statistical analysis of regulatory ecotoxicity tests. Chemosphere 2001, 45:659-669.
22. Klimisch H.J., Andreae M., Tillmann U. A systematic approach for evaluating the quality of experimental toxicological and ecotoxicological data. Regul. Toxicol. Pharm. 1997, 25:1-5.
23. Mallett M.J., Grandy N.J., Lacey R.F. Interlaboratory comparison of a method to evaluate the effects of chemicals on fish growth. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1997, 16:528-533.
24. Maltby L., Blake N., Brock T.C.M., Van den Brink P.J. Addressing Interspecific Variation in Sensitivity and the Potential to Reduce this Source of Uncertainty in Ecotoxicological Assessments. DEFRA Project Code PN0932 2002, UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London, UK.
25. Maltby L., Blake N., Brock T.C.M., Van Den Brink P.J. Insecticide species sensitivity distributions: importance of test species selection and relevance to aquatic ecosystems. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2005, 24:379-388.
26. OECD, 1995. Guidance document for aquatic effect assessment. In: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (Ed.), Paris.
27. Posthuma L., Suter G.W., Traas T.P. Species Sensitivity Distributions in Ecotoxicology 2002, Lewis Publishers, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
28. Roex E.W.M., Van Gestel C.A., Van Wezel A.P., Van Straalen N.M. Ratios between acute aquatic toxicity and effects on population growth rates in relation to toxicant mode of action. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2000, 19:685-693.
29. Sijm D., De Bruijn J., Crommentuijn T., Van Leeuwen K. Environmental quality standards: endpoints or triggers for a tiered ecological effect assessment approach?. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2001, 20:2644-2648.
30. USEPA, 1979. Toxic Pollutant Effluent Standards. 40 CFR 401.15. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
31. USEPA, 1985. Guidelines for Deriving Numerical National Water Quality Criteria for the Protection of Aquatic Organisms and Their Uses. National Technical Information Service Accession Number PB85-227049. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
32. USEPA, 2000. Chemical Advisory and Notice of Potential Risk: Skin exposure to molten 2,4-Dichlorophenol can Cause Rapid Death. pp. 1-13.
33. USEPA, 2002. US Environmental Protection Agency, ECOTOX Database. US EPA, Washington, DC. http://cfpub.epa.gov/ecotox/.
34. Van Straalen N.M., Denneman C.A.J. Ecotoxicological evaluation of soil quality criteria. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 1989, 18:241-251.
35. Wheeler J.R., Grist E.P.M., Leung K.M.Y., Morritt D., Crane M. Species sensitivity distributions: data and model choice. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2002, 45:192-202.
36. Yin D., Jin H., Yu L., Hu S. Deriving freshwater quality criteria for 2,4-dichlorophenol for protection of aquatic life in China. Environ Pollut. 2003, 122:217-222.
37. Zhang T., Jin H.J. Use of duckweed (Lemna minor L.) growth inhibition test to evaluate the toxicity of acrylonitrile, sulphocyanic sodium and acetonitrile in China. Environ. Pollut. 1997, 98:143-147.
38. Zhang X.Y., Zha J.M., Li W., Yang L.H., Wang Z.J. Effects of 2,4-dichlorophenol on the expression of vitellogenin and estrogen receptor genes and physiology impairments in Chinese rare minnow (Gobiocypris rarus). Environ. Toxicol. 2008, 23:694-701.