Haptic Length Display Based on Cutaneous-Proprioceptive Integration

Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 489-498

  Terada, Kazunori ^a   Kumazaki, Akinori ^a   Miyata, Daisuke ^a,b   Ito, Akira ^a  

^a GIFU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b FUJI SOFT ABC INCORPORATED   (Japan)

Author keywords

cutaneous sensation; haptic display; multisensory integration; proprioception

Indexed keywords

INTEGRATION;

CUTANEOUS SENSATION; HAPTIC DISPLAY; HAPTICS; INDEX FINGER; LENGTH PERCEPTION; MULTISENSORY INTEGRATION;

SENSORY PERCEPTION;

EID: 79961205470     PISSN: 09153942     EISSN: 18838049     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.20965/jrm.2006.p0489     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. D. F. Collins, K. M. Refshauge, G. Todd, and S. C. Gandevia, “Cutaneous receptors contribute to kinesthesia at the index finger, elbow, and knee,” Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol.94, pp. 16991706, 2005.
2. R. H. Cormack, “Haptic illusion: apparent elongation of a disk rotated between the fingers,” Science, Vol.179, No.73, pp. 590-592, 1973.
3. D. A. Corsini, and H. L. Pick Jr., “The effect of texture on tactually perceived length,” Perception & Psychophysics, Vol.5, No.6, pp. 352-356, 1969.
4. M. Degenaar, and G.-J. Lokhorst, “Molyneux’s problem,” In E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall, 2005.
5. J. J. DiCarlo, and K. O. Johnson, “Velocity invariance of receptive field structure in somatosensory cortical area 3b of the alert monkey,” The Journal of Neuroscience, Vol.19, No.1, pp. 401-419, 1999.
6. H. Faineteau, E. Gentaz, and P. Viviani, “The kinaesthetic perception of euclidean distance: a study of the detour effect,” Experimental Brain Research, Vol.152, No.2, pp. 166-172, 2003.
7. J. J. Gibson, “Observations on active touch,” Psychological Review, Vol.69, No.6, pp. 477-491, 1962.
8. H. Helson, “The tau effect.an example of psychological relativity,” Science, Vol.71, No.1847, pp. 536-537, 1930.
9. A. Hohmuth, W. D. Phillips, and H. VanRomer, “A discrepancy between two modes of haptic length perception,” The Journal of Psychology, Vol.92, pp. 79-87, 1976.
10. M. Hollins, and A. K. Goble, “Perception of the length of voluntary movements,” Somatosensory Research, Vol.5, No.4, pp. 335-348, 1988.
11. M. Hollins, andS. R. Risner, “Evidencefor the duplextheory of tactile texture perception,” Perception & Psychophysics, Vol.62, No.4, pp. 695-705, 2000.
12. K. O. Johnson, and J. R. Phillips, “A rotating drum stimulator for scanning embossed patterns and textures across the skin,” Journal of Neuroscience Methods, Vol.22, No.3, pp. 221-231, 1988.
13. J. R. Pruett Jr., R. J. Sinclair, and H. Burton, “Response patterns in second somatosensory cortex (SII) of awake monkeys to passively applied tactile gratings,” The Journal of Neurophysiology, Vol.84, No.2, pp. 780-797, 2000.
14. D. Kats, “The world of touch,” Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1989.
15. S. J. Lederman, R. L. Klatzky, and P. O. Barber, “Spatial and movementbased heuristics for encoding pattern information through touch,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Vol.114, No.1, pp. 33-49, 1985.
16. E. M. Meftah, L. Belingard, and C. E. Chapman, “Relative effects of the spatial and temporal characteristics of scanned surfaces on human perception of tactile roughness using passive touch,” Experimental Brain Research, Vol.132, No.3, pp. 351- 361, 2000.
17. V. Smetacek, and F. Mechsner, “Making sense,” Nature, Vol.432, No.21, 2004.