Effects of semen characteristics on IUI combined with mild ovarian stimulation

Archives of Andrology

Volumn 50, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 239-246

  Yalti, S ^a,b   Gurbuz B ^a   Sezer, H ^a   Celik S ^a  

^a Zeynep Kamil Maternity Hospital   (Turkey)

^b NONE   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Infertility; IUI; Ovarian stimulation; Pregnancy rate; Semen

Indexed keywords

CHORIONIC GONADOTROPIN; CLOMIFENE CITRATE; HUMAN MENOPAUSAL GONADOTROPIN; KLOMEN; MENAGON;

ADULT; BACTERIUM; CELL STRUCTURE; CONCEPTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FERTILITY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; INFERTILITY; INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION; LEUKOCYTE; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MALE; MULTIPLE PREGNANCY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OVARY; OVULATION INDUCTION; PREDICTION; PREGNANCY RATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; SPERM; SPERMATOZOON DENSITY; SPERMATOZOON MOTILITY;

ADULT; CLOMIPHENE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INSEMINATION, ARTIFICIAL, HETEROLOGOUS; INSEMINATION, ARTIFICIAL, HOMOLOGOUS; MALE; OVULATION INDUCTION; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEMEN; SPERM COUNT; SPERM MOTILITY;

EID: 79961201696     PISSN: 01485016     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01485010490448435     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Allen NC, Herbert CM, et al. (1985). Intrauterine insemination: a critical review. Fertil Steril 44:569.
2. Bostofte E, Serup J, and Rebbe H. (1984). Interrelations among the characteristics of human semen, and a new system for classification of male infertility. Fertil Steril 41:9.
3. Cohlen BJ, Velde ER, et al. (1998): Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterin insemination for treating male subfertilitiy: a controlled study. Hum Reprod 13:1553-1558.
4. Cruz RI, Kemmann E, et al. (1986): A prospective study of intrauterin insemination of processed sperm from men with oligoasthenospermia in superovulated women. Fertil Steril 46:673-677.
5. Dickey RP, Pyrzak R, et al. (1999): Comparison of the sperm quality necessary for successful intrauterine insemination with World Health Organization threshold values for normal sperm. Fertil Steril 71:684-689.
6. Fanchin R, Olivennes F, et al. (1995): A new system for fallopian tube sperm perfusion leads to pregnancy rates twice as high as standard intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 64:505-510.
7. Francavilla F, Romano R, et al. (1990): Effect of sperm morphology and motile sperm count on outcome of intrauterine insemination in oligozoospermia and/or asthenozoospermia. Fertil Steril 53:892-897.
8. Ho P-C, Poon IML, et al. (1989): Intrauterine insemination is not useful in oligoasthenospermia. Fertil Steril 51:682-684.
9. Huang HY, Lee CL, Lai YM (1996): The impact of the total motile sperm count on the success of intrauterine insemination with husband's spermatozoa. J Assist Reprod Genet 13:56-63.
10. Karlström PO, Bergh T, Lundkvist O (1993): A prospective randomized trial of artificial insemination versus intercourse in cycles stimulated with human menopausal gonadotropin or clomiphene citrate. Fertil Steril 59:554-559.
11. Khalil RM, Rasmussen EP, Erb K (2001): Homologous intrauterin insemination. An evaluation of prognostic factors based on a review of 2473 cycles. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 80:74-81.
12. Kruger TF, Menkveld R, et al. (1986): Sperm morphologic features as a prognostic factor in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 46:1118-1123.
13. Miller D, Hollenbeck B, et al. (2002): Processed total motil sperm count correlates with pregnancy outcome after intrauterin insemination. Urology 60:497-501.
14. Peterson CM, Hatasaka HH, et al. (1994): Ovulation induction with gonadotropins and intrauterine insemination compared with in vitro fertilization and no therapy: a prospective, nonrandomized, cohort study and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 62:535-544.
15. Robin W, Burr RS, Scan P (1996): The influence of sperm morphology and the number of motile sperm inseminated on the outcome of intrauterine insemination combined with mild ovarian stimulation. Fertil Steril 65:127-132.
16. Sigman M (1994): Assisted reproductive techniques and male infertility. Urol Clin North Am 21:505-515.
17. Sunde A, Kahn JA, Moine K (1988): Intrauterine insemination: a European collaborative report. Hum Reprod 2:69-73.
18. World Health Organization (1987): WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Semen-cervical Mucus Interection, 2nd Ed. Cambridge: The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
19. Van Voorhis JB, Barnett M, et al. (2001): Effect of total motile sperm count on the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of intrauterine insemination and in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 75:4.
20. Zayed F, Lenton EA, Cooke ID (1997): Comparison between stimulated in-vitro fertilization and stimulated intrauterine insemination for the treatment of unexplained and mild male factor infertility. Hum Reprod 12:2408-2413.