A practical guide to surveys and questionnaires

Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

Volumn 144, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 831-837

  Slattery, Eric L ^a   Voelker, Courtney C J ^a   Nussenbaum, Brian ^a   Rich, Jason T ^a   Paniello, Randal C ^a   Neely, J Gail ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Instrument; Psychometrics; Questionnaires; Survey design; Surveys

Indexed keywords

HEALTH SURVEY; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; VALIDITY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES;

DATA COLLECTION; HUMANS; OTOLARYNGOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 79961178539     PISSN: 01945998     EISSN: 10976817     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0194599811399724     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Piccirillo JF, Merritt MGJ, Richards ML. Psychometric and clinimetric validity of the 20-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-20). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;126:41-47. (Pubitemid 41122866)
2. Fink A. The Survey Kit. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2003.
3. Groves RM. Survey Methodology. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley; 2009.
4. Rea LM, Parker RA. Designing and Conducting Survey Research: A Comprehensive Guide. 3rd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2005.
5. Fink A. How to Conduct Surveys: A Step-by-Step Guide. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2009.
6. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2008.
7. Rust J, Golombok S. Modern Psychometrics: The Science of Psychological Assessment. 3rd ed. Hove, UK: Routledge; 2009.
8. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric Theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
9. Aday LA, Cornelius LJ. Designing and Conducting Health Surveys: A Comprehensive Guide. 3rd ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2006.
10. Vogt DS, King DW, King LA. Focus groups in psychological assessment: enhancing content validity by consulting members of the target population. Psychol Assess. 2004;16:231-243. (Pubitemid 39244708)
11. Smith TW. The art of asking questions, 1936-1985. Public Opin Q. 1987;51:S95-S108.
12. Geer JG. Do open-ended questions measure "salient" issues? Public Opin Q. 1991;55:360-370.
13. Payne SLB. The Art of Asking Questions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1951.
14. Fowler FJ. Improving Survey Questions: Design and Evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1995.
15. Dillman DA. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley; 2007.
16. Tourangeau R, Rips LJ, Rasinski KA. The Psychology of Survey Response. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
17. Neely J, Karni R, Engel S, Fraley PL, Nussenbaum B, Paniello RC. Practical guides to understanding sample size and minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;136:14-18. (Pubitemid 46037911)
18. Cannell CF, Oksenberg L, Converse JM, et al. Experiments in Interviewing Techniques: Field Experiments in Health Reporting, 1971-1977. Ann Arbor: Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan; 1979.
19. Fowler FJ. Survey Research Methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2009.
20. Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2009.
21. Brand JPL, van Buuren S, Groothuis-Oudshoorn K, Gelsema ES. A toolkit in SAS for the evaluation of multiple imputation methods. Statistica Neerlandica. 2003;57:36-45. (Pubitemid 41724436)
22. Groves RM. Survey Nonresponse. New York: John Wiley; 2002.
23. Choi BC, Pak AW. A catalog of biases in questionnaires. Prev Chronic Dis. 2005;2:A13.
24. Jabine TB; US National Research Council; Committee on National Statistics. Cognitive Aspects of Survey Methodology: Building a Bridge Between Disciplines: Report of the Advanced Research Seminar on Cognitive Aspects of Survey Methodology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1984.
25. Means B; US National Center for Health Statistics. Autobiographical Memory for Health-Related Events. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, National Center for Health Statistics; 1989.
26. Salovey P, Smith AE, Turk DC, Jobe JB, Willis GB. The accuracy of memory for pain: not so bad most of the time. APS J. 1993;2:181-191.
27. Stone AA, Broderick JE, Kaell AT, DelesPaul PA, Porter LE. Does the peak-end phenomenon observed in laboratory pain studies apply to real-world pain in rheumatoid arthritics? J Pain. 2000;1:212-217.
28. Stone AA, Broderick JE, Shiffman SS, Schwartz JE. Understanding recall of weekly pain from a momentary assessment perspective: absolute agreement, between- and within-person consistency, and judged change in weekly pain. Pain. 2004;107:61-69. (Pubitemid 38058700)
29. Todorov A, Kirchner C. Bias in proxies' reports of disability: data from the National Health Interview Survey on disability. Am J Public Health. 2000;90:1248-1253. (Pubitemid 30497378)
30. Yip JY, Wilber KH, Myrtle RC, Grazman DN. Comparison of older adult subject and proxy responses on the SF-36 health-related quality of life instrument. Aging Ment Health. 2001;5:136-142. (Pubitemid 32547248)