Opening the black box of system usage: User adaptation to disruptive IT

European Journal of Information Systems

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 589-607

  Christophe, M ^a   Elie Dit Cosaque, Christophe M ^a   Straub, Detmar W ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DAUPHINE   (France)

^b GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

control; coping model of user adaptation; disruptive information technologies; opportunities; systems usage; threats

Indexed keywords

CONTROL ENGINEERING; INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

BLACK BOXES; LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS; OPPORTUNITIES; SYSTEM USAGES; SYSTEMS USAGE; THREATS; USER ADAPTATION; USER STRATEGIES;

ELECTRIC GROUNDING;

EID: 79961130805     PISSN: 0960085X     EISSN: 14769344     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/ejis.2010.23     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. BAGOZZI RP, BAUMGARTNER H and YOUJAE Y (1992) Appraisal processes in the enactment of intentions to use coupons. Psychology & Marketing 9(6), 469-486.
2. BEAUDRY A and PINSONNEAULT A (2005) Understanding user responses to information technology: a coping model of user adaptation. MIS Quarterly 29(3), 493-524. (Pubitemid 46063139)
3. BENBASAT I and BARKI H (2007) Quo vadis, TAM? Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8(4), 211-218.
4. BERNARD J-G, RIVARD S and AUBERT BA (2004) L'exposition au risque d'implantation d'ERP: éléments de mesure et d'atténuation. Systèmes d'Information et Management 9(2), 25-50.
5. BOUDREAU M-C, GEFEN D and STRAUB D (2001) Validation in IS research: a state-of-the-art assessment. MIS Quarterly 25(1), 1-26.
6. BOUDREAU M-C and ROBEY D (2005) Enacting integrated information technology: a human agency perspective. Organization Science 16(1), 3-18. (Pubitemid 40366610)
7. BURTON-JONES A and STRAUB DW (2006) Reconceptualizing system usage: an approach and empirical test. Information Systems Research 17(3), 228-246. (Pubitemid 44371787)
8. CHATTOPADHYAY P, GLICK WH and HUBER GP (2001) Organizational actions in response to threats and opportunities. Academy of Management Journal 44(5), 937-955.
9. COOK TD and CAMPBELL DT (1979) Quasi Experimentation: Design and Analytical Issues for Field Settings. Rand McNally, Chicago.
10. CROZIER M and FRIEDBERG E (1977) Actors and Systems: The Politics of Collective Action (Translation of 'L'Acteur et le Système'). The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
11. DAVENPORT TH, HAMMER M and METSISTO TJ (1989) How executives can shape their company's information systems. Harvard Business Review 67(2), 130-134.
12. DAVIS FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13(3), 319-340.
13. DELONE WH and MCLEAN ER (2003) The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems 19(4), 9-30.
14. DESANCTIS G and POOLE MS (1994) Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science 5(2), 121-147.
15. FOLKMAN S, LAZARUS RS, DUNKEL-SCHETTER C, DELONGIS A and GRUEN RJ (1986) Dynamics of a stressful encounter: cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50(5), 992-1003.
16. FROMKIN HL and STREUFERT S (1976) Laboratory experimentation. In Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (DUNNETTE B, Ed), pp 415-465, Rand McNally College Publishing Company, Chicago, Il.
17. GALLIVAN MJ (2001) Organizational adoption and assimilation of complex technological innovations: development and application of a new framework. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems 32(3), 51-85. (Pubitemid 33784839)
18. GEFEN D, STRAUB D and BOUDREAU M (2000) Structural equation modeling techniques and regression: guidelines for research practice. Communications of AIS 7(7), 1-78.
19. GORDON ME, SLADE LA and SCHMITT N (1986) The 'Science of the Sophomore' revisited: from conjecture to empiricism. Academy of Management Review 11(1), 191-207.
20. HAMMER M (1990) Reengineering: don't automate, obliterate. Harvard Business Review 68(4), 104-112.
21. HAMMER M and CHAMPY J (1993) Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution. Harper Business, New York, NY.
22. HSIAO-LAN W, WANG ETG and PEI-HUNG J (2005) Understanding misalignment and cascading change of ERP implementation: a stage view of process analysis. European Journal of Information Systems 14(4), 324-334.
23. JACKSON SE and DUTTON JE (1988) Discerning threats and opportunities. Administrative Science Quarterly 33(3), 370-387.
24. KOCK N, LYNN GS, DOW KE and AKGüN AE (2006) Team adaptation to electronic communication media: evidence of compensatory adaptation in new product development team. European Journal of Information Systems 3(15), 331-341. (Pubitemid 44146932)
25. LAMB R and KLING R (2003) Reconceptualizing users as social actors in information systems research. MIS Quarterly 27(2), 197-235.
26. LAPOINTE L and RIVARD S (2005) A multilevel model of resistance to information technology implementation. MIS Quarterly 29(3), 461-491. (Pubitemid 46063138)
27. LAZARUS RS and FOLKMAN S (1984) Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. Springer Publishing Company, New York.
28. LYYTINEN K and ROSE GM (2003) The disruptive nature of information technology innovations: the case of internet computing in systems development organizations. MIS Quarterly 27(4), 557-595.
29. MARTINKO MJ, HENRY JW and ZMUD RW (1996) An attributional explanation of individual resistance to the introduction of information technologies in the workplace. Behaviour & Information Technology 15(5), 313-330. (Pubitemid 126576314)
30. NELSON KM and COOPRIDER JG (1996) The contribution of shared knowledge to IS group performance. Mis Quarterly 20(4), 409-432.
31. NELSON KM and GHODS M (1998) Measuring technology flexibility. European Journal of Information Systems 4(7), 232-240. (Pubitemid 128684590)
32. NUNNALLY JC (1967) Psychometric Theory. McGraw Hill, New York.
33. PETTER S, STRAUB D and RAI A (2007) Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Quarterly 31(4), 623-656. (Pubitemid 351153306)
34. PINSONNEAULT A and KRAEMER KL (1993) The impact of information technology on middle managers. MIS Quarterly 17(3), 271-292.
35. PODSAKOFF PM, MACKENZIE SB, LEE J-Y and PODSAKOFF NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88(5), 879-903. (Pubitemid 37239703)
36. SHAW JB and BARRETT-POWER E (1997) A conceptual framework for assessing organization, work group, and individual effectiveness during and after downsizing. Human Relations 50(2), 109-128. (Pubitemid 127034119)
37. SHERIF K, ZMUD RW and BROWNE GJ (2006) Managing peer-to-peer conflicts in disruptive information technology innovations: the case of software reuse. MIS Quarterly 30(2), 339-356. (Pubitemid 46050495)
38. SKINNER N and BREWER N (2002) The dynamics of threats and challenge appraisals prior to stressful achievement events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83(3), 678-692.
39. STRAUB DW and BURTON-JONES A (2007) Veni, Vidi, Vici: breaking the TAM logjam. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8(4), 224-229.
40. STRAUB DW and KARAHANNA E (1998) Knowledge worker communications and recipient availability: toward a task closure explanation of media choice. Organization Science 9(2), 160-175.
41. THOMAS KW and VELTHOUSE BA (1990) Cognitive elements of empowerment. Academy of Management Review 15(4), 666-681.
42. TOMAKA J, BLASCOVICH J, KELSEY RM and LEITTEN CL (1993) Subjective, physiological, and behavioral effects of threat and challenge appraisal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65(2), 248-260.
43. VAAST E and WALSHAM G (2005) Representations and actions: the transformation of work practices with IT use. Information and Organization 15(1), 65-89.
44. VAN DER HEIJDEN H (2004) User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Quarterly 28(4), 695-704.
45. VENKATESH V, MORRIS MG, DAVIS GB and DAVIS FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27(3), 425-478.
46. WU J and LEDERER A (2009) A meta-analysis of the role of environment-based voluntariness in information technology acceptance. Mis Quarterly 33(2), 419-432.