Uncertainty in land cover datasets for global land-surface models derived from 1-km global land cover datasets

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 25, Issue 17, 2011, Pages 2703-2714

  Nakaegawa, T ^a  

^a NONE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Area ratio method; Comparative analysis; Dominant land cover method; Global land cover dataset; Land surface model

Indexed keywords

AREA RATIOS; COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS; DATA SETS; HOMOGENEOUS REGIONS; LAND COVER; LAND COVER CLASSIFICATION; LAND COVER DATASETS; LAND SURFACE MODELS; LAND-COVER TYPES; SOURCES OF UNCERTAINTY; SPATIAL AGGREGATION; TRANSITION ZONES;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); LAGRANGE MULTIPLIERS; PIXELS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

LANDFORMS;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; DATA INTERPRETATION; DATA SET; LAND CLASSIFICATION; LAND COVER; LAND SURFACE; PIXEL; RETENTION; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 79961128476     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: 10991085     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.8011     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Armstrong RN, Lawrence WM. 2007. A variable velocity flow routing algorithm for GCM. Journal of Geophysical Research 104(D4): 30965-30974.
2. Bartholome E, Belward AS. 2005. GLC2000: a new approach to global land cover mapping from earth observation data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 26: 1959-1977.
3. Brown de Colstoun E, DeFries RS, Townshend JRG. 2006. Evaluation of ISLSCP Initiative II satellite-based land cover datasets and assessment of progress in land cover data for global model. Journal of Geophysical Research 111: D22S07.
4. Danko, DM. 1992. The Digital Chart of the World. GeoInfo Systems 2: 29-36.
5. Di Gregorio A. 2005. Land Cover Classification System. FAO Environment and Natural Resources series 8. FAO: Rome; pp. 208.
6. Dirmeyer PA, Gao X, Zhao M, Guo Z, Oki T, and Hanasaki N. 2006. The Second Global Soil Wetness Project (GSWP-2): Multi-model analysis and implications for our perception of the land surface. Bulletin of American Meteorological Society 87: 1381-1397.
7. Döll P, Kaspar F, Lehner B. 2003. A global hydrological model for deriving water availability indicators: model tuning and validation. Journal of Hydrology 270: 105-134.
8. Foody, GM. 2008. Harshness in image classification accuracy assessment. International Journal of Remote Sensing 29: 3137-3158. DOI:10.1080/01431160701442120.
9. Frey KE, Smith LC. 2007. How well do we know northern land cover? Comparison of four global vegetation and wetland products with a new ground-truth database for west Siberia. Global Biological Cycle 21: GB1016.
10. Friedl MA, McIver DK, Hodges JCF, Zhang XY, Muchoney D, Strahler AH, Woodcock CE, Gopal S, Schneider A, Cooper A, Baccini A, Gao F, Schaaf C. 2002. Global land cover mapping from MODIS: algorithms and early results. Remote Sensing Environment 82: 287-302.
11. Ge J, Qi J, Lofgren BM, Moore N, Torbick N, Olson JM. 2007. Impacts of land use/cover classification accuracy on regional climate simulations. Journal of Geophysical Research 112: D05107.
12. Giri C, Zhub Z, Reed B. 2005. A comparative analysis of the Global Land Cover 2000 and MODIS land cover datasets. Remote Sensing Environment 94: 123-132.
13. Hall FG, Brown de Colstoun E, Collatz GJ, Landis D, Dirmeyer P, Betts A, Huffman GJ, Bounoua L, Meeson B. 2006. ISLSCP Initiative II global datasets: Surface boundary conditions and atmospheric forcings for land-atmosphere studies. Journal of Geophysical Research 111: D22S01.
14. Hansen MC, Defries RS, Townshend JRG, Sohlberg R. 2000. Global land cover classification at 1 km spatial resolution using a classification tree approach. International Journal of Remote Sensing 21: 1331-1364.
15. Hansen MC, Reed B. 2000. A comparison of the IGBP DISCover and University of Maryland 1 km global land cover products. International Journal of Remote Sensing 21: 1365-1373.
16. Herold M, Mayaux P, Woodcock CE, Baccini A, Schmullius C. 2008. Some challenges in global land cover mapping: An assessment of agreement and accuracy in existing 1 km datasets. Remote Sensing Environment 112: 2538-2556.
17. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2007. Climate change 2007. The Physical Science Basis. Working Group I Contribution to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Changes, Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds); Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, USA; pp. 996.
18. Jensen RJ. 2004. Introductory Digital Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective. Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ; pp. 544.
19. Kitoh A, Ose T, Kurihara K, Kusunoki S, Sugi M, KAKUSHIN Team-3 Modeling Group. 2009. Projection of changes in future weather extremes using super-high-resolution global and regional atmospheric models in the KAKUSHIN Program: Results of preliminary experiments. Hydrological Research Letters 3: 49-53.
20. Koster RD, Suarez MJ. 1992. A comparative analysis of two land surface heterogeneity representation. Journal of Climate 5: 1380-1390.
21. Loveland TR, Reed BC, Brown JF, Ohlen DO, Zhu J, Yang L, Merchant JW. 2000. Development of a global land cover characteristics database and IGBP DISCover from 1-km AVHRR data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 21: 1303-1330.
22. McCallum I, Obersteiner M, Nilsson S, Shvidenko A. 2006. A spatial comparison of four satellite derived 1 km global land cover datasets. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 8: 246-255.
23. Nakaegawa T. 2008. Reproducibility of the seasonal cycles of hydrological variables in Japanese 25-year reanalysis. Hydrological Research Letters 2: 56-60, DOI:10.3178/HRL.2.56.
24. Nakaegawa T, Itho A, Tokuhiro T, Hosaka M. 2007. Evaluation of seasonal cycles of hydrological processes in JMA Land Data Analysis. Papers of Meteorology and Geophysics 58: 73-83.
25. Nakaegawa T, Oki T, Musiake K. 2000. The effects of heterogeneity within an area on areally averaged evaporation. Hydrological Processes 14: 465-480.
26. Nakaegawa T, Oki T, Musiake K. 2001. Aggregation criteria for surface heat balance in a heterogeneous area based on a linear model. Advances in Water Resources 24: 1159-1171.
27. Nakaegawa T, Vergara W. 2010. First Projection of Climatological Mean River Discharges in the Magdalena River Basin, Colombia, in a Changing Climate during the 21st Century, Hydrological Research Letters 4: 50-54.
28. Oki T, Agata Y, Kanae S, Saruhashi T, Yang D, Musiake K. 2001. Global assessment of current water resources using total runoff integrating pathways. Hydrological Science Journal 46: 983-996.
29. Oleson KW, Driese KL, Maslanik JA, Emery WJ, Reiners WA. 1997. The sensitivity of a land surface parameterization scheme to the choice of remotely sensed land-cover datasets. Monthly Weather Review 125: 1537-1555.
30. Sanderson EW, Jaiteh M, Levy MA, Redford KH, Wannebo AV, Woolmer G. 2002. The human footprint and the last of the wild. BioScience 52: 981-904.
31. Sertel, Robock A, Ormecia C. 2009. Impacts of land cover data quality on regional climate simulations. International Journal of Climatology: DOI:10.1002/joc.2036.
32. Seth A, Giorgi F, Dickinson RE. 1994. Simulating fluxes from heterogeneous land surface: Explicit subgrid method employing the Biosphere-Atmosphere Transfer scheme (BATS). Journal of Geophysical Research 99: 18651-18667.
33. Tateishi R. 2008. Global land cover by national mapping organizations (GLCNMO). In Technical Report of the Geospatial Information Authority of Japan, 526: 79-88.
34. Thomlinson JR, Bolstad PV, Cohen WB. 1999. Coordinating methodologies for scaling landcover classifications from site-specific to global: Steps toward validating global map products. Remote Sensing Environment 70: 16-28.