Efficacy of fibrin tissue adhesive in the attachment of autogenous conjuntival graft on primary pterygium surgery;Eficácia do adesivo tecidual de fibrina na fixação de enxerto conjuntival autógeno em cirurgias de pterígio primário

Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia

Volumn 74, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 123-126

  Rubin, Michel Risnic ^a   Dantas, Paulo Elias C ^a   Nishiwaki Dantas, M Cristina ^a   Felberg, Sergio ^a  

^a IRMANDADE DA SANTA CASA DE MISERICÓRDIA DE SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Comparative study; Conjunctiva transplantation; Conjunctival diseases pathology; Fibrin tissue adhesive therapeutic use; Graft vs host disease; Pterygium surgery; Sutures

Indexed keywords

FIBRIN GLUE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOTRANSPLANTATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONJUNCTIVA; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HYPEREMIA; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PTERYGIUM; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SUTURING METHOD; TIME; TRANSPLANTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CONJUNCTIVA; FIBRIN TISSUE ADHESIVE; HUMANS; HYPEREMIA; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PTERYGIUM; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; TIME FACTORS; TRANSPLANTATION, AUTOLOGOUS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79961109768     PISSN: 00042749     EISSN: 16782925     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0004-27492011000200011     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bahar I, Weinberger D, Dan G, Avisar R. Pterygium surgery: fibrin glue versus Vicryl sutures for conjunctival closure. Cornea. 2006;25(10):1168-72.
2. Davidoff F, Tarnow EG. Who's the author? Problems with biomedical authorship, and some possible solutions. Report of the Council of Biology Editors (now Council of Science Editors from the Task Force on Authorship, February 2000 [Internet]. New York: Council of Science Editors; 2000. [cited 2010 Nov 21]. Available from: http://www.councilscienceeditors.org/files/public/v23n4p111-119.pdf
3. Ferraz FH, Schellini SA, Hoyama E, Bernardes SR, Padovani CR. Pterígio e alterações da curvatura corneana. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2002;65(5):533-6.
4. Hercules LA, Viveiros MM, Schellini SA, Candeias J, Padovani CR. Exposição de fibroblastos da cápsula de Tenon de pterígios à ciclosporina 0,05%. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2006;69(6):831-5.
5. Koranyi G, Seregard S, Kopp ED. Cut and paste: a no suture, small incision approach to pterygium surgery. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88(7):911-4. Comment in: Br J Ophthalmol. 2005; 89(3):392; author reply 392.
6. Luanratanakorn P, Ratanapakorn T, Suwan-apichon O, Chuck RS. Randomised controlled study of conjuctival autograft versus amniotic membrane graft in pterygium excision. Br J Ophthalmol;.2006;90(12):1476-80.
7. Jaros PA, DeLuise VP. Pingueculae and pterygia. Surv Ophthalmol. 1988;33(1):41-9.
8. Schellini SA, Veloso CE, Lopes W, Padovani CR. Características de portadores de pterígio na região de Botucatu. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2005;68(3):291-4.
9. Maheshwari S. Pterygium-induced corneal refractive changes. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2007; 55(5):383-6.
10. Sánchez-Thorin JC, Rocha G, Yelin JB. Meta-analysis on the recurrence rates after bare sclera resection with and without mitomycin C use and conjunctival autograft placement in surgery for primary pterygium. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998;82(6):661-5.
11. Kenyon KR, Wagoner MD, Hettinger ME. Conjunctival autograft transplantation for advanced and recurrent pterygium. Ophthalmology. 1985;92(11):1461-70.
12. Tan DT, Chee SP, Dear KB, Lim AS. Effect of pterygium morphology on pterygium recurrence in a controlled trial comparing conjunctival autografting with bare sclera excision. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115(10):1235-40. Erratum in: Arch Ophthalmol. 1998; 116(4):552.
13. Bahar I, Weinberger D, Gaton DD, Avisar R. Fibrin glue versus Vicryl sutures for primary conjunctival closure in pterygium surgery: long-term results. Curr Eye Res. 2007;32(5): 399-405.
14. Schwartz M, Madariaga J, Hirose R, Shaver TR, Sher L, Chari R, et al. Comparison of a new fibrin sealant with standard topical hemostatic agents. Arch Surg. 2004;139(11):1148-54.
15. Wang GJ, Hungerford DS, Savory CG, Rosenberg AG, Mont MA, Burks SG, et al. Use of fibrin sealant to reduce bloody drainage and hemoglobin loss after total knee arthroplasty: a brief note on a randomized prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 83-A(10): 1503-5.
16. Prabhasawat P, Barton K, Burkett G, Tseng SC. Comparison of conjunctival autografts, amniotic membrane grafts, and primary closure for pterygium excision. Ophthalmology. 1997;104(6):974-85.
17. Parell GJ, Becker GD. Comparison of absorbable with nonabsorbable sutures in closure of facial skin wounds. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2003;5(6):488-90.
18. Marticorena J, Rodriguez-Ares MT, Touriño R, Mera P, Valladares M, Martinzes-de-la-Casa JM, et al. Pterygium surgery: conjunctival autograft using fibrin adhesive. Cornea. 2006; 25(1):34-6.
19. Uy HS, Reyes JM, Flores JD, Lim-Bon-Siong R. Comparison of fibrin glue and sutures for attaching conjunctival autografts after pterygium excision. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(4): 667-71.
20. Ozdamar Y, Mutevelli S, Han U, Ileri D, Onal B, Ilhan O, et al. A comparative study of tissue glue and Vicryl suture for closing limbal-conjunctival autografts and histologic evaluation after pterygium excision. Cornea. 2008;27(5):552-8.
21. Farid M, Pirnazar R. Pterygium recurrence after excision with conjunctival autograft: a comparison of fibrin tissue adhesive to absorbable sutures. Cornea. 2009;28(1):43-5.
22. Karalezli A, Kucukerdonmez C, Akova YA, Altan-Yaycioglu R, Borazan M. Fibrin glue versus sutures for conjunctival autografting in pterygium surgery: a prospective comparative study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92(9):1206-10.