Reconciling evidence-based practice, evidence-informed practice, and practice-based research: The role of clinical data-mining

Social Work

Volumn 56, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 284-288

  Epstein, Irwin ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79961098766     PISSN: 00378046     EISSN: 15456846     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sw/56.3.284     Document Type: Note

References (18)

1. Epstein, I. (1987). Pedagogy of the perturbed:Teaching research to the reluctants.Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 1, 71-89.
2. Epstein, I. (1995). Promoting reflective social work practice: Research strategies and consulting principles. In P. Hess & E. Mullens (Eds.), Practitioner-researcher partnerships: Building knowledge from, in, and for practice (pp. 83-102). Washington, DC: NASW Press.
3. Epstein, I. (1996). In quest of a research-based model for clinical practice: Or, why can't a social worker be more like a researcher? Social Work Research, 20, 97-100.
4. Epstein, I. (2001). Using available information in practicebased research: Mining for silver while dreaming of gold. Social Work in Health Care, 33(3/4), 15-32.
5. Epstein, I. (2009). Promoting harmony where there is commonly conflict: Evidence-informed practice as an integrative strategy. Social Work in Health Care, 48, 216-231.
6. Epstein, I. (2010). Clinical data-mining: Integrating practice and research. New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Gambrill, E. (2010). Evidence-informed practice: Antidote to propaganda in the helping professions? Research on Social Work Practice, 20, 302-320.
8. Gray, M., Plath, D., & Webb, S. A. (2009). Evidence-based practice: A critical stance. New York: Routledge.
9. Haight.W. L. (2010). The multiple roles of applied social science research in evidence-informed practice [Guest Editorial]. Social Work, 55, 101-103.
10. Osteen, P. (2010). [Review of the book Randomized controlled trials: Design and implementation of communitybased psychosocial interventions, by P. Solomon, M. M. Cavanaugh, & J. Draine]. Social Work, 55, 189.
11. Petr, C. G. (Ed.). (2008). Multidimensional evidence-based practice: Synthesizing knowledge, research, and values. New York: Routledge.
12. Pignotti, M., & Thyer, B.A. (2009). Use of novel unsupported and empirically supported therapies by licensed clinical social workers: An exploratory study. Social Work Research, 33, 5-17.
13. Rehr, H., Rosenberg, C., & Blumenfield, S. (Eds.). (1998). Creative social work in health care: Clients, the community and your organization. New York: Springer.
14. Rubin, A. (2006). Foreword. In L. Alexander & P. Solomon (Eds.), The research process in the human services: Behind the scenes (pp. xii-xiv). Belmont, CA: Thomson-Brooks/Cole.
15. Sainz, A., & Epstein, I. (2001). Creating experimental analogs with available clinical information: Credible alternatives to "gold- standard" experiments? Social Work in Health Care, 33(3/4), 163-183.
16. Shyne.A.W. (1960). Use of available material. In N. A. Polansky (Ed.), Social work research (pp. 106-124). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17. Solomon, P., Cavanaugh, M. M., & Draine J. (2009). Randomized controlled trials: Design and implementation of community-based psychosocial interventions. New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Stoesz, D. (2010). Second-rate research for second-class citizens [Review of the book Evidence-based social work:A critical stance, by M. Gray, D. Plath, & S.A. Webb]. Research on Social Work Practice, 20, 329-332.