Abstinence-orientated residential rehabilitation of opioid users in Denmark: Do changes in national treatment policies affect treatment outcome?

Scandinavian Journal of Public Health

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 582-589

  Pedersen, Mads Uffe ^a   Hesse, Morten ^a   Bloomfield, Kim ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

changes; drug treatment; Opioids; outcome; policies

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENMARK; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; OPIATE ADDICTION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; REGISTER; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; COHORT STUDIES; DENMARK; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPIOID-RELATED DISORDERS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUESTIONNAIRES; REGISTRIES; SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT CENTERS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79961098421     PISSN: 14034948     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1403494811407673     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Møller K. Kontrolregimer og narkotikapolitik: Hvordan balanceres borgernes velbefindende og selvbestemmelse [Drug Policy Control Regimes - Balancing Citizen’s Well-Being and Self-Determination]. In: Frank V.A., Dahl H.V., editors. Illegale rusmidler og kriminalitet [Illegal Substances and Criminality]. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag; 2010;145-168.
2. Frank V.A., Dahl H.V., Kolind T. Cannabis treatment in Danish prisons: a product of new directions in national drug policy? In: Korf D.J., editor. Cannabis in Europe: dynamic in perception, policy and markets ; 2008. pp. 30-50.
3. Pedersen M.U. Professional expertise versus market mechanisms: the treatment guarantee, freedom of choice, privatization and evidence based practice. NAD-Publikation 2007;50:315-38.
4. National Board of Health [Sundhedsstyrelsen]. Stofmisbrugere i behandling 1996-2002 [Drug misusers in treatment 1996-2002] 2003;7(9). http://www.sst.dk/publ/tidsskrifter/nyetal/pdf/2003/09_03.pdf (accessed 10 April 2011).
5. National Board of Health [Sundhedsstyrelsen]. Stofmisbrugere i behandling 2005 [Drug Misusers in Treatment 2005] 2006;13. http://www.sst.dk/publ/tidsskrifter/nyetal/pdf/2006/13_06.pdf (accessed 10 April 2011).
6. Pedersen M.U. Stoffri døgnbehandling 1997 til 2007. [Drug-free residential treatment 1997 to 2007]. Aarhus University, Århus: Centre for Alcohol and Drug Research; 2009.
7. Danish Rehabilitation and Information System/DANRIS; 2009. HYPERLINK http://www.danris.dk/default_en.asp www.danris.dk/default_en.asp [English version] (accessed 10 April 2011).
8. National Board of Health [Sundhedsstyrelsen]. Focal Point: Narkotikasituationen i Danmark [Focal point: The drug situation in Denmark]. EMCDDA; 2010. http://www.sst.dk/publ/Publ2010/CFF/Narkotika/NarkotikasituationenDK2010.pdf (accessed 10 April 2011).
9. Retskemisk afdeling. [Department of Forensic Medicine] Drugs on street level 2009. Report to the National Board of Health. Aarhus: Aarhus University; 2010.
10. Hunt W.A., Barnett L.W., Branch L.G. Relapse rates in addiction programs. J Clin Psychol 1971;27(4):455-6.
11. Simpson D.W. National treatment system evaluation based on the drug abuse reporting program (DARP). Follow-up research. NIDA Research Monograph Series. Drug Abuse, Treatment Evaluation, Strategies, Progress and Prospects 1984 ;51:29-41.
12. Simpson D.W., Savage J.L., Lloyd M.R. Follow-up evaluation of treatment of drug abuse during 1969-1972. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1979;36:772-80.
13. Downey L., Rosengren D.B., Jackson T.R., Donovan D.M. Primary heroin users + drug-free treatment: an equation for success ? Addict Behav 2003;28(2):339-46.
14. Hubbard R.L., Rachal R., Craddock S.G., Cavanaugh E.R. Treatment Outcome Perspective Study (TOPS). NIDA Research Monograph Series. Drug Abuse, Treatment Evaluation, Strategies, Progress and Prospects 1984;51:42-68.
15. Hubbard R.L. Drug abuse treatment - a national study of effectiveness. London: The University of North Carolina Press; 1991.
16. Gossop M., Stewart D., Browne N., Marsden J. Factors associated with abstinence, lapse or relapse to heroin use after residential treatment: protective effect of coping responses. Addiction 2002;97(10):1259-67.
17. Darke S., Ross J., Mills K.L., Williamson A.H., Teesson M. Patterns of sustained abstinence among long-term dependent heroin users: 36 month findings from the Australian Treatment Outcome Study (ATOS). Addict Behav 2007;32:1897-906.
18. McLellan A.T., McKay J.R., Forman R., Cacciola J., Kemp J. Reconsidering the evaluation of addiction treatment: from retrospective follow-up to concurrent recovery monitoring. Addiction 2005;100(4):447-58.
19. Project Match Research Group. Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: Project MATCH posttreatment drinking outcomes. J Studies Alcohol 1997;58(1):7-29.
20. Tomlinson K.L., Brown S.A., Abrantes A. Psychiatric comorbidity and substance abuse treatment outcomes of adolescents. Psychol Addict Behav 2004;18(2):160-9.
21. Brown S.A., Ramo D.E. Clinical course of youth following treatment for alcohol and drug problems. In: Liddle H.A., Rowe C.L., editors. Adolescent substance abuse. Research and clinical advances. London: Cambridge University Press; 2006. pp. 79-103.
22. National Board of Health. National Register of Drug Users Admitted to Treatment (NRDAT). Copenhagen: National Board of Health; 2009.
23. Carey K.B., Carey M.P., Maisto S.A., Henson J.M. Temporal stability of the timeline followback interview for alcohol and drug use with psychiatric outpatients. J Studies Alcohol 2004;65(6):774-81.
24. DeMarce J.M., Burden J.L., Lash S.J., Stephens R.S., Grambow S.C. Convergent validity of the Timeline Followback for persons with comorbid psychiatric disorders engaged in residential substance use treatment. Addict Behav 2007;32(8):1582-92. Epub 2007 Jan 24.