Views of disability in Portugal: 'Fado' or citizenship?

Disability and Society

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 567-581

  Loja, Ema ^a   Costa, Emília ^a   Menezes, Isabel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Barriers; Disability associations; Disabled community; Identity; Politicization; Sociopolitical model

Indexed keywords

EID: 79961076347     PISSN: 09687599     EISSN: 13600508     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09687599.2011.589191     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Abberley, P. 1987. The concept of oppression and the development of a social theory of disability. Disability, Handicap & Society 2, no. 1: 5-19.
2. ANDST, ISPA, and IEFP. 2006. A reintegração sócio-profissional da pessoa com deficiência adquirida por acidente de trabalho [Socio-professional reintegration of work-impaired people]. Porto: ANDST, ISPA, and IEFP.
3. Barnes, C. 1999. Disability studies: New or not so new directions? Disability & Society 14: 577-80.
4. Barnes, C., T. Mercer, and T. Shakespeare. 2005. Exploring disability: A sociological introduction. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.
5. Batavia, A. 2001. Oppression and disability: Are people with disabilities an oppressed minority? Special issue. Journal of Disability Policy Studies 12, no. 2: 66-7.
6. Britannica Online Encyclopedia. 2010. http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/200134/fado.
7. Calhoun, C. 1990. Social theory and the politics of identity. Cambridge: Blackwell.
8. Cameron, C. 2009. Tragic but brave or just crips with chips? Songs and their lyrics in the Disability Arts Movement in Britain. Popular Music 28, no. 3: 381-396.
9. Charlton, J. 1998. Nothing about us without us: Disability oppression and empowerment. Berkeley: University of California Press.
10. CRPG and IEFP. 2004. Contributos para um Modelo de Análise dos Impactos das Intervenções do FSE no Domínio das Pessoas com Deficiência em Portugal [Contributions for a model of analysis of the European Social Fund impact on the disability domain in Portugal]. Vila Nova de Gaia: CRPG.
11. CRPG and ISCTE. 2007. Mais qualidade de vida para as pessoas com deficiências e incapacidades - uma estratégia para Portugal [More quality of life for people with impairments and disabilities - a strategy for Portugal]. Vila Nova de Gaia: CRPG.
12. French, S., and J. Swain. 2004. Whose tragedy: Towards a personal non-tragedy view of disability. In Disabling barriers - Enabling environments, ed. J. Swain, S. French, C. Barnes, and C. Thomas, 34-40, London: Sage.
13. Hahn, H. 1985a. Introduction: Disability police and the problem of discrimination. American Behavioural Scientist 28: 293-318.
14. Hahn, H. 1985b. Towards a politics of disability: Definitions, disciplines, and policies. Social Science Journal 22: 88-96.
15. Linton, S. 1998. Claiming disability: Knowledge and identity. New York: New York University Press.
16. Malheiro, J. 1996. Associativismo Popular: Originalidade do Povo Português [Popular associativism: originality of Portuguese people]. Almada: Câmara Municipal de Almada.
17. Martins, A. n.d. O movimento associativo popular e a democracia [The popular associative movement and democracy]. http://www.25abril.org/a25abril/get_document.php?id=259.
18. McCarthy, H. 2003. The disability rights movement: experiences and perspectives of selected leaders in the disability community. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin 46: 209-23.
19. Oliver, M. 1990. The politics of disablement. Basingstoke: McMillan.
20. Oliver, M. 1993. Disability and dependency: A creation of industrial societies? In Disabling barriers - enabling environments, ed. J. Swain, V. Finkelstein, S. French, and M. Oliver, 49-60. London: Sage.
21. Oliver, M. 1996. Understanding disability: From theory to practice. London: Macmillan.
22. Oliver, M. 2006. Social policy and disability: Some theoretical issues. In Overcoming disabling barriers - 18 years of disability and society, ed. L. Barton, 7-20. Abingdon: Routledge.
23. Oliver, M., and J. Zarb. 1997. The politics of disability: A new approach. Vol. 2 of Disability studies: Past, Present and future, ed. L. Barton and M. Oliver, 195-216. Leeds: The Disability Press.
24. Pearson, V. 1989. Making a virtue of necessity: Hospital and community care for the mentally ill in China. International Social Work 32: 53-633.
25. Pearson, V. 1995. Mental health care in China: State policies professional services and family responsibilities. London: Gaskell Press.
26. Portney, L., and M. Watkins. 1993. Foundations of clinical research: Application to practice. Stamford, CT: Appleton & Lange.
27. Puttman, M. 2005. Conceptualizing disability: Developing a framework for political disability identity. Journal of Disability Policy Studies 16, no. 3: 188-1988.
28. Shakespeare, T. 1996. Disability, identity and difference. Vol. 6 of Exploring the Divide, ed. C. Barnes and G. Mercer, 94-113. Leeds: The Disability Press.
29. Shakespeare, T. 2006. Disabled people's self-organization: A new social movement? In Overcoming disabling barriers - 18 years of disability and society, ed. L. Barton, 53-59. Abingdon: Routledge.
30. Stoer, S.R., A.M. Magalhães, and D. Rodrigues. 2004. Os lugares de exclusão social: Um dispositivo de diferenciação pedagógica. [The places of social exclusion: a device for pedagogic differentiation]. São Paulo: Cortez Editora.
31. Sutherland, A. 1981. Disabled we stand. London: Souvenir Press.
32. Swain, J., and S. French. 2000. Towards an affirmative model of disability. Disability and Society 15, no. 4: 569-582.
33. Titchkosky, T. 2006. Disability, self and society. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
34. Trochim, W. 2002. Bill Trochim's center for social research methods: Knowledge base. http://www.causeweb.org/cwis/SPT-FullRecord.php?ResourceId=92.
35. Zimmerman, M., and S. Warschausky. 1998. Empowerment theory for rehabilitation research: Conceptual and methodological issues. Rehabilitation Psychology 43, no. 1: 3-16.