Spin squeezing with coherent light via entanglement swapping

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 83, Issue 5, 2011, Pages

  TasgIn M E ^a   Meystre, P ^a  

^a University of Arizona   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATOM-ATOM ENTANGLEMENT; ATOM-PHOTON ENTANGLEMENT; ENTANGLEMENT SWAPPING; EXPERIMENTAL SYSTEM; SPIN SQUEEZING;

ATOMS;

EID: 79961074725     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: 10941622     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.83.053848     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. L. Mandel and E. Wolf, Optical Coherence and Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995).
2. M. Kitagawa and M. Ueda, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.47.5138 47, 5138 (1993).
3. A. Sørensen, L.-M. Duan, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/35051038 409, 63 (2001). (Pubitemid 32098622)
4. A. Micheli, D. Jaksch, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.013607 67, 013607 (2003).
5. J. Estéve, C. Gross, A. Weller, S. Giovanazzi, and M. K. Oberthaler, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/nature07332 455, 1216 (2008).
6. L.-M. Duan, A. Sørensen, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3991 85, 3991 (2000). (Pubitemid 32020550)
7. A. Kuzmich, Klaus Mølmer, and E. S. Polzik, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.4782 79, 4782 (1997).
8. D. J. Wineland, J. J. Bollinger, W. M. Itano, F. L. Moore, and D. J. Heinzen, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.46.R6797 46, R6797 (1992).
9. G. F. Grom and A. M. Kuz'mich, JETP Lett. 61, 900 (1995).
10. J. Hald, J. L. Sørensen, C. Schori, and E. S. Polzik, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.1319 83, 1319 (1999).
11. Y. Takahashi, K. Honda, N. Tanaka, K. Toyoda, K. Ishikawa, and T. Yabuzaki, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.60.4974 60, 4974 (1999).
12. A. Kuzmich, N. P. Bigelow, and L. Mandel, Europhys. Lett. EULEEJ 0295-5075 10.1209/epl/i1998-00277-9 42, 481 (1998).
13. A. Kuzmich, L. Mandel, and N. P. Bigelow, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.1594 85, 1594 (2000).
14. M. H. Schleier-Smith, I. D. Leroux, and V. Vuletić, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.073604 104, 073604 (2010).
15. Measurement-induced spin squeezing is a powerful tool for initial state preparation, but it does not provide continuous squeezing as the measurement normally collapses the system to a squeezed state that is not centered about the current value of the mean spin vector.
16. M. Takeuchi, S. Ichihara, T. Takano, M. Kumakura, T. Yabuzaki, and Y. Takahashi, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.023003 94, 023003 (2005). (Pubitemid 40629800)
17. M. Zukowski, A. Zeilinger, M. A. Horne, and A. K. Ekert, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.4287 71, 4287 (1993).
18. C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, C. Cr Aepeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres, and W. K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.1895 70, 1895 (1993).
19. S. Bose, V. Vedral, and P. L. Knight, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.57.822 57, 822 (1998).
20. J.-W. Pan, D. Bouwmeester, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.3891 80, 3891 (1998).
21. M. E. Taşgin, M. A. Oktel, L. You, and A. E. Müstecaploglu, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.79.053603 79, 053603 (2009).
22. I. D. Leroux, M. H. Schleier-Smith, and V. Vuletić, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.073602 104, 073602 (2010).
23. B. Yurke, S. L. McCall, and J. R. Klauder, Phys. Rev. A PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.33.4033 33, 4033 (1986).
24. L.-M. Duan, J. I. Cirac, P. Zoller, and E. S. Polzik, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.5643 85, 5643 (2000). (Pubitemid 32090285)
25. Daniel A. Steck, Rubidium 87 D Line Data, available online at http://steck.us/alkalidata (revision 2.1.4, 23 December 2010).
26. ′ = 3 manifolds with a strong blue-detuned rf field.
27. An anisotropic shift of the excited manifold levels can also be used to eliminate unwanted diagonal couplings.
28. B. W. Shore, P. Meystre, and S. Stenholm, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B JOBPDE 0740-3224 10.1364/JOSAB.8.000903 8, 903 (1991).
29. N. Bigelow, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/35051193 409, 27 (2001). (Pubitemid 32098608)
30. H.-J. Miesner, D. M. Stamper-Kurn, J. Stenger, S. Inouye, A. P. Chikkatur, and W. Ketterle, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.2228 82, 2228 (1999).
31. S. Steinke, S. Singh, M. E. Taşgin, P. Meystre, K. Schwab, and M. Vengallatore, e-print arXiv: 1105.1856.