Correlating locations in ipsilateral breast tomosynthesis views using an analytical hemispherical compression model

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 56, Issue 15, 2011, Pages 4715-4730

  Van Schie, Guido ^a   Tanner, Christine ^b   Snoeren, Peter ^a   Samulski, Maurice ^a   Leifland, Karin ^c   Wallis, Matthew G ^d   Karssemeijer, Nico ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c ST GÖRAN S HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^d ADDENBROOKE S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL SOLUTIONS; AUTOMATIC METHOD; AUTOMATIC SEGMENTATIONS; BREAST TISSUES; BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS; CAD SYSTEM; CANCER DETECTION; CENTRAL AXIS; CENTRE OF GRAVITY; COMPRESSION MODEL; COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION; DEFORMABLE SPHERES; DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS; FEATURE-BASED; LOCAL SEARCH METHOD; MAMMOGRAPHIC; MULTI-VIEWS; PECTORAL MUSCLES; POINT OF INTEREST; REGISTRATION METHODS; SPATIAL TRANSFORMATION; TIME-CONSUMING TASKS; TOMOSYNTHESIS;

SPHERES; THREE DIMENSIONAL; TISSUE;

MAMMOGRAPHY;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BREAST; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; MAMMOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; TIME;

BREAST; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAMMOGRAPHY; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 79961051706     PISSN: 00319155     EISSN: 13616560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/15/006     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Altrichter M, Ludnyi Z and Horvth G 2005 Joint analysis of multiple mammographic views in CAD systems for breast cancer detection Image Analysis (Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol 3540) pp 760-9 (Pubitemid 41422718)
2. Chung J, Rajagopal V, Nielsen P and Nash M P 2008 Modelling mammographic compression of the breast Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol 5242) (Berlin: Springer) pp 758-65
3. Karssemeijer N 1998 Automated classification of parenchymal patterns in mammograms Phys. Med. Biol. 43 365-78 (Pubitemid 28100138)
4. Kita Y, Highnam R and Brady M 2001 Correspondence between different view breast x-rays using curved epipolar lines Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 83 38-56 (Pubitemid 32863879)
5. Paquerault S, Petrick N, Chan H-P, Sahiner B and Helvie M A 2002 Improvement of computerized mass detection on mammograms: fusion of two-view information Med. Phys. 29 238-47 (Pubitemid 34157996)
6. Pathmanathan P, Gavaghan D, Whiteley J, Brady M, Nash M, Nielsen P and Rajagopal V 2004 Predicting tumour location by simulating large deformations of the breast using a 3D finite element model and nonlinear elasticity Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol 3217) (Berlin: Springer) pp 217-24 (Pubitemid 40787229)
7. Rafferty E A, Niklason L T and Jameson-Meehan L A 2006 Breast tomosynthesis: one view or two? Annu. Meeting Radiological Society of North America p 335
8. Rijken H 2002 Positioning in mammography The Practice of Mammography: Pathology-Technique-Interpretation-Adjunct Modalities ed D J Dronkers, J H C L Hendriks, R Holland and G Rosenbusch (Stuttgart: Georg Thieme Verlag) chapter 6 pp 98-123
9. Rodriguez F, Patel S K and Cohen C 1990 Measuring the modulus of a sphere by squeezing between parallel plates J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 40 285-95 (Pubitemid 20685677)
10. Ruiter N V 2003 Registration of X-ray mammograms and MR-volumes of the female breast based on simulated mammographic deformation PhD Dissertation Universität Mannheim
11. Samani A, Bishop J, Yaffe M J and Plewes D B 2001 Biomechanical 3D finite element modeling of the human breast using MRI data IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 20 271-9 (Pubitemid 32536136)
12. Samulski M and Karssemeijer N 2008 Matching mammographic regions in mediolateral oblique and cranio caudal views: a probabilistic approach Proc. SPIE 6915 69151M
13. van Schie G, Tanner C and Karssemeijer N 2011 Estimating corresponding locations in ipsilateral breast tomosynthesis views Proc. SPIE 7963 796306
14. Tanner C, Hipwell J H and Hawkes D J 2008 Statistical deformation models of breast compressions from biomechanical simulations IWDM '08: Proc. 9th Int. Workshop on Digital Mammography vol 5116 (Berlin: Springer) pp 426-32
15. Tanner C, White M, Guarino S, Hall-Craggs M A, Douek M and Hawkes D J 2009 Anisotropic behaviour of breast tissue for large compressions IEEE Int. Symp. on Biomedical Imaging pp 1223-6
16. Tanner C, White M, Guarino S, Hall-Craggs M A, Douek M and Hawkes D J 2011 Large breast compressions: observations and evaluation of simulations Med. Phys. 38 682-90
17. Timp S, Karssemeijer N and Hendriks J 2002 Analysis of changes in masses using contrast and size measures IWDM '02: Proc. 6th Int. Workshop on Digital Mammography (Berlin: Springer) pp 240-2
18. Veldkamp W J, Karssemeijer N, Otten J D and Hendriks J H 2000 Automated classification of clustered microcalcifications into malignant and benign types Med. Phys. 27 2600-8
19. Yam M, Brady M, Highnam R, Behrenbruch C, English R and Kita Y 2001 Three-dimensional reconstruction of microcalcification clusters from two mammographic views IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 20 479-89 (Pubitemid 32657852)
20. Yin H M, Sun L Z, Wang G, Yamada T, Wang J and Vannier M W 2004 ImageParser: a tool for finite element generation from three-dimensional medical images Biomed. Eng. Online 3 31
21. Zheng B, Leader J K, Abrams G S, Amy H L, Wallace L P, Maitz G S and Gur D 2006 Multiview-based computer-aided detection scheme for breast masses Med. Phys. 33 3135-43 (Pubitemid 44327413)
22. Zheng B, Tan J, Ganott M A, Chough D M and Gur D 2009 Matching breast masses depicted on different views: a comparison of three methods Acad. Radiol. 16 1338-47