End-to-end versus end-to-side esophagogastrostomy after esophageal cancer resection: A prospective randomized study

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 254, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 226-233

  Nederlof, Nina ^a   Tilanus, Hugo W ^a   Tran, T C Khe ^a   Hop, Wim C J ^a   Wijnhoven, Bas P L ^a   De Jonge, Jeroen ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADULT RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTICLE; CANCER STAGING; CHYLOTHORAX; COMORBIDITY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELIRIUM; DYSPHAGIA; END TO END ANASTOMOSIS; END TO SIDE ANASTOMOSIS; ESOPHAGOGASTROSTOMY; ESOPHAGUS CANCER; ESOPHAGUS DILATATION; ESOPHAGUS RECONSTRUCTION; ESOPHAGUS STRICTURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HEART INFARCTION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDIASTINITIS; PATIENT MONITORING; PLEURA EMPYEMA; PNEUMONIA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REOPERATION; SEPSIS; SURGICAL INFECTION; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL RATE; TRANSABDOMINAL ESOPHAGECTOMY; TRANSHIATAL RESECTION; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; VOCAL CORD PARALYSIS;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; ANASTOMOTIC LEAK; BARRETT ESOPHAGUS; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; ENDPOINT DETERMINATION; ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS; ESOPHAGEAL STENOSIS; ESOPHAGECTOMY; ESOPHAGOGASTRIC JUNCTION; ESOPHAGUS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PNEUMONIA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PRECANCEROUS CONDITIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STOMACH; SURGICAL STAPLING; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 79961046317     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: 15281140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31822676a9     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Muller JM, Erasmi H, Stelzner M, et al. Surgical therapy of oesophageal carcinoma. Br J Surg. 1990;77(8):845-857. (Pubitemid 20249685)
2. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57(1):43-66. (Pubitemid 46148091)
3. Scott Swanson M. Surgical management of localized esophageal cancer. Up-ToDate Online, 2008.
4. Richard E, Sampliner M. Epidemiology, pathobiology and clinical manifestations of esophageal cancer. UpToDate Online, 2008.
5. Omloo JM, Lagarde SM, Hulscher JB, et al. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the mid/distal esophagus: five-year survival of a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2007;246(6):992-1000; discussion 1000-1001. (Pubitemid 350179188)
6. Tabira Y, Sakaguchi T, Kuhara H, et al. The width of a gastric tube has no impact on outcome after esophagectomy. Am J Surg. 2004;187(3):417-421. (Pubitemid 38299512)
7. Fok M, Wong J. Cancer of the oesophagus and gastric cardia. Standard oesophagectomy and anastomotic technique. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1995;84(2):179-183.
8. Deng B, Wang RW, Jiang YG, et al. Functional and menometric study of sideto-side stapled anastomosis and traditional hand-sewn anastomosis in cervical esophagogastrostomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;35(1):8-12.
9. Atkins BZ, Shah AS, Hutcheson KA, et al. Reducing hospital morbidity and mortality following esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78(4):1170-6; discussion 1170-1176. (Pubitemid 39303829)
10. Lerut T, Coosemans W, Decker G, et al. Anastomotic complications after esophagectomy. Dig Surg. 2002;19(2):92-98. (Pubitemid 34458051)
11. Parekh K, Iannettoni MD. Complications of esophageal resection and reconstruction. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;19(1):79-88. (Pubitemid 46488831)
12. Page RD, Shackcloth MJ, Russell GN, Pennefather SH. Surgical treatment of anastomotic leaks after oesophagectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005;27(2):337-343. (Pubitemid 40193148)
13. Peeters KC, Tollenaar RA, Marijnen CA, et al. Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2005;92(2):211-216. (Pubitemid 40269337)
14. Brisinda G, Vanella S, Cadeddu F, et al. End-to-end versus end-to-side stapled anastomoses after anterior resection for rectal cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2009;99(1):75-79.
15. Simillis C, Purkayastha S, Yamamoto T, et al. A meta-analysis comparing conventional end-to-end anastomosis vs. other anastomotic configurations after resection in Crohn's disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50(10):1674-1687. (Pubitemid 47583357)
16. Resegotti A, Astegiano M, Farina EC, et al. Side-to-side stapled anastomosis strongly reduces anastomotic leak rates in Crohn's disease surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48(3):464-468. (Pubitemid 40767866)
17. Munoz-Juarez M, Yamamoto T, Wolff BG, Keighley MR. Wide-lumen stapled anastomosis vs. conventional end-to-end anastomosis in the treatment of Crohn's disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44(1):20-25; discussion 25-26.
18. Mellow MH, Pinkas H. Endoscopic laser therapy for malignancies affecting the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. Analysis of technical and functional efficacy. Arch Intern Med. 1985;145(8):1443-1446. (Pubitemid 15049800)
19. Briel JW, Tamhankar AP, Hagen JA, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for ischemia, leak, and stricture of esophageal anastomosis: gastric pull-up versus colon interposition. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;198(4):536-541; discussion 541-542. (Pubitemid 38446525)
20. Honkoop P, Siersema PD, Tilanus HW, et al. Benign anastomotic strictures after transhiatal esophagectomy and cervical esophagogastrostomy: risk factors and management. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;111(6):1141-1146; discussion 1147-1148.
21. Williams VA, Watson TJ, Zhovtis S, et al. Endoscopic and symptomatic assessment of anastomotic strictures following esophagectomy and cervical esophagogastrostomy. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(6):1470-1476.
22. Heitmiller RF, Fischer A, Liddicoat JR. Cervical esophagogastric anastomosis: results following esophagectomy for carcinoma. Dis Esophagus. 1999;12(4):264-269. (Pubitemid 30195424)
23. Walther B, Johansson J, Johnsson F, et al. Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophageal resection and gastric tube reconstruction: a prospective randomized trial comparing sutured neck anastomosis with stapled intrathoracic anastomosis. Ann Surg. 2003;238(6):803-812; discussion 812-814.
24. Zieren HU, Muller JM, Pichlmaier H. Prospective randomized study of one-or two-layer anastomosis following oesophageal resection and cervical oesophagogastrostomy. Br J Surg. 1993;80(5):608-611. (Pubitemid 23167242)
25. Okuyama M, Motoyama S, Suzuki H, et al. Hand-sewn cervical anastomosis versus stapled intrathoracic anastomosis after esophagectomy for middle or lower thoracic esophageal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled study. Surg Today. 2007;37(11):947-952. (Pubitemid 47622212)
26. Blackmon SH, Correa AM, Wynn B, et al. Propensity-matched analysis of three techniques for intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83(5):1805-1813; discussion 1813. (Pubitemid 46616807)
27. Urschel JD, Blewett CJ, Bennett WF, et al. Handsewn or stapled esophagogastric anastomoses after esophagectomy for cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Dis Esophagus. 2001;14(3-4):212-217. (Pubitemid 34172991)
28. Craig SR, Walker WS, Cameron EW, Wightman AJ. A prospective randomized study comparing stapled with handsewn oesophagogastric anastomoses. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1996;41(1):17-19. (Pubitemid 26061578)
29. Valverde A, Hay JM, Fingerhut A, Elhadad A. Manual versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis after resection for carcinoma: a controlled trial. French Associations for Surgical Research. Surgery. 1996;120(3):476-483. (Pubitemid 26337122)
30. Law S, Fok M, Chu KM, Wong J. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 1997;226(2):169-173. (Pubitemid 28047539)
31. Laterza E, de' Manzoni G, Veraldi GF, et al. Manual compared with mechanical cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis: a randomised trial. Eur J Surg. 1999;165(11):1051-1054. (Pubitemid 29529383)
32. Suturing or stapling in gastrointestinal surgery: a prospective randomized study. West of Scotland and Highland Anastomosis Study Group. Br J Surg. 1991;78(3):337-341.
33. Santos RS, Raftopoulos Y, Singh D, et al. Utility of total mechanical stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a comparison to conventional anastomotic techniques. Surgery. 2004;136(4):917-925. (Pubitemid 39311320)
34. Urschel JD. Esophagogastrostomy anastomotic leaks complicating esophagectomy: a review. Am J Surg. 1995;169(6):634-640.
35. Dewar L, Gelfand G, Finley RJ, et al. Factors affecting cervical anastomotic leak and stricture formation following esophagogastrectomy and gastric tube interposition. Am J Surg. 1992;163(5):484-489.
36. Anikin VA, McManus KG, Graham AN, McGuigan JA. Total thoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;185(6):525-529. (Pubitemid 127469819)
37. Orringer MB, Marshall B, Iannettoni MD. Transhiatal esophagectomy: clinical experience and refinements. Ann Surg. 1999;230(3):392-400; discussion 400-403.
38. McLarty AJ, Deschamps C, Trastek VF, et al. Esophageal resection for cancer of the esophagus: long-term function and quality of life. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;63(6):1568-1572. (Pubitemid 27321515)
39. Collard JM, Romagnoli R, Goncette L, et al. Terminalized semimechanical side-to-side suture technique for cervical esophagogastrostomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;65(3):814-817. (Pubitemid 28162486)
40. Bruce J, Krukowski ZH, Al-Khairy G, et al. Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg. 2001;88(9):1157-1168. (Pubitemid 34015597)
41. Katariya K, Harvey JC, Pina E, Beattie EJ. Complications of transhiatal esophagectomy. J Surg Oncol. 1994;57(3):157-163. (Pubitemid 24350879)
42. Gandhi SK, Naunheim KS. Complications of transhiatal esophagectomy. Chest Surg Clin N Am. 1997;7(3):601-10; discussion 611-612.
43. Marmuse JP. [A technic of transhiatal esophagectomy]. J Chir (Paris). 1988;125(10):585-592.
44. Koskas F, Gayet B. Anatomical study of retrosternal gastric esophagoplasties. Anat Clin. 1985;7(4):237-256. (Pubitemid 16110958)
45. Ndoye JM, Dia A, Ndiaye A, et al. Arteriography of three models of gastric oesophagoplasty: the whole stomach, a wide gastric tube and a narrow gastric tube. Surg Radiol Anat. 2006;28(5):429-437.
46. Buunen M, Rooijens PP, Smaal HJ, et al. Vascular anatomy of the stomach related to gastric tube construction. Dis Esophagus. 2008;21(3):272-274. (Pubitemid 351593933)
47. Klijn E, Niehof S, de Jonge J, et al. The effect of perfusion pressure on gastric tissue blood flow in an experimental gastric tube model. Anesth Analg. 110(2):541-546.