A stable and accurate projection method on a locally refined staggered mesh

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids

Volumn 67, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 74-92

  Liu, Qianlong ^a  

^a Johns Hopkins University   (United States)

Author keywords

Coupling of two meshes; Linear interpolation; Locally refined mesh; Overlapping zone; Pressure Poisson equation; Projection method; Stable and accurate

Indexed keywords

LINEAR INTERPOLATION; LOCALLY REFINED MESH; OVERLAPPING ZONES; PRESSURE POISSON EQUATION; PROJECTION METHOD; STABLE AND ACCURATE;

ALGORITHMS; INCOMPRESSIBLE FLOW; INTERPOLATION; NUMERICAL CONTROL SYSTEMS; POISSON EQUATION; REFINING; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

NUMERICAL METHODS;

EID: 79961043907     PISSN: 02712091     EISSN: 10970363     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/fld.2338     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Berger MJ, Colella P. Local adaptive mesh refinement for shock hydrodynamics. Journal of Computational Physics 1989; 82:64-84.
2. Minion ML. A projection method for locally refined mesh. Journal of Computational Physics 1996; 127:158-177.
3. Roma AM, Peskin CS, Berger MJ. An adaptive version of the immersed boundary method. Journal of Computational Physics 1999; 153:509-534.
4. Griffith BE, Hornung RD, McQueen DM, Peskin CS. An adaptive, formally second order accurate version of the immersed boundary method. Journal of Computational Physics 2007; 223:10-49.
5. Martin DF, Colella P, Graves D. A cell-centered adaptive projection method for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations in three dimensions. Journal of Computational Physics 2008; 227:1863-1886.
6. Khokhlov AM. Fully threaded tree algorithms for adaptive refinement fluid dynamics simulations. Journal of Computational Physics 1998; 143:519-543.
7. Popinet S. Gerris: a tree-based adaptive solver for the incompressible Euler equations in complex geometries. Journal of Computational Physics 2003; 190:572-600.
8. Losasso F, Gibou F, Fedkiw R. Simulating water and smoke with an octree data structure. ACM Transactions on Graphics (SIGGRAPH Proceedings), Los Angeles, CA, 2004; 457-462.
9. Min C, Gibou F. A second order accurate projection method for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations on non-graded adaptive grids. Journal of Computational Physics 2006; 219:912-929.
10. Harlow F, Welch E. Numerical calculation of time-dependent viscous incompressible flow of fluid with free surface. Physics of Fluids 1965; 8:2182-2189.
11. Thompson MC, Ferziger JH. An adaptive multigrid technique for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Journal of Computational Physics 1989; 82:94-121.
12. Fletcher CAJ. Computational Techniques for Fluid Dynamics (2nd edn), vol. II. Springer: Berlin, 1991.
13. Morinishi Y, Lund TS, Vasilyev OV, Moin P. Fully conservative higher order finite difference schemes for incompressible flow. Journal of Computational Physics 1998; 143:90-124.
14. Vasilyev OV. High order finite difference schemes on non-uniform meshes with good conservation properties. Journal of Computational Physics 2000; 157:746-761.
15. Verstappen RWCP, Veldman AEP. Symmetry-preserving discretization of turbulent flow. Journal of Computational Physics 2003; 187:343-368.
16. Ferziger JH, Peric M. Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics (3rd edn). Springer: Berlin, 2002.
17. Zhang Z, Prosperetti A. A second-order method for three-dimensional particle flow simulations. Journal of Computational Physics 2005; 210:292-324.
18. Liu Q, Prosperetti A. Wall effects on a rotating sphere. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 2010; accepted. DOI: 10.1017/S002211201000128X.
19. Mikulencak DR, Morris JF. Stationary shear flow around fixed and free bodies at finite Reynolds number. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 2004; 520:215-242.
20. Burton TM, Eaton JK. Fully resolved simulations of particle-turbulence interaction. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 2005; 545:67-111.