Supercritical carbon dioxide processed resorbable polymer nanocomposite bone graft substitutes

Acta Biomaterialia

Volumn 7, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 3382-3389

  Baker, Kevin C ^a,b   Manitiu, Mihai ^b   Bellair, Robert ^b   Gratopp, Carly A ^a   Herkowitz, Harry N ^a   Kannan, Rangaramanujam M ^b  

^a WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b Wayne State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone graft; Bone tissue engineering; Nanocomposite; Polylactic acid; Scaffold

Indexed keywords

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIOMECHANICS; BONE; CALCIUM PHOSPHATE; CARBON DIOXIDE; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; POLYESTERS; SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY); SUPERCRITICAL FLUID EXTRACTION;

AUTOGENOUS BONE; BONE GRAFT; BONE GRAFT SUBSTITUTES; BONE TISSUE ENGINEERING; HARD TISSUES; POLYMER NANOCOMPOSITE; POLYMER-NANOCOMPOSITE; RESORBABLE; SUPERCRITICAL CARBONDIOXIDES; SYNTHETIC BONE GRAFTS;

NANOCOMPOSITES;

CALCIUM PHOSPHATE; CARBON DIOXIDE; NANOCOMPOSITE; NANOMATERIAL; POLYLACTIC ACID; POLYSTYRENE; SUPERCRITICAL CARBON DIOXIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANGIOGENESIS; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BONE GRAFT; BONE PROSTHESIS; CANCELLOUS BONE; CELL INFILTRATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISPERSION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IN VIVO STUDY; NUTRIENT UPTAKE; OSTEOBLAST; POROSITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

EID: 79961007509     PISSN: 17427061     EISSN: 18787568     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.05.014     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Malloy KM, Hilibrand AS. Autograft versus allograft in degenerative cervical disease. Clin Orthop Rel Res 2002;394:27-38. (Pubitemid 34062706)
2. Samartzis D, Shen FH, Matthews DK, Yoon St, Goldberg EF, An HS. Comparison of allograft to autograft in multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with rigid plate fixation. Spine J 2003;3(6):451-9.
3. Wigfield CC, Nelson RJ. Nonautologous interbody fusion materials in cervical spine surgery: how strong is the evidence to justify their use? Spine 2001;26(6):687-94.
4. Arribas-Garcia I, Alcala-Galiano A, Garcia AF, Moreno JJ. Fracture of the anterior iliac crest following monocortical bone graft harvest in bisphosphonaterelated mandibular pathological fracture: a case report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;107(6):e12-4.
5. Hu RW, Bohlman HH. Fracture at the iliac bone graft harvest site after fusion of the spine. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1994;309:208-13.
6. Chau AM, Mobbs RJ. Bone graft substitutes in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Eur Spine J 2009;18(4):449-64.
7. Moroni A, Larsson S, Hoang Kim A, Gelsomini L, Giannoudis PV. Can we improve fixation and outcomes? Use of bone substitutes. J Orthop Trauma 2009;23(6):422-5.
8. Baker KC, Bellair RJ, Manitiu M, Herkowitz HN, Kannan RM. Structure and mechanical properties of supercritical carbon dioxide-processed porous resorbable polymer constructs. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2009;2(6):620-6.
9. Georgiou G, Mathieu L, Pioletti DP, Bourban P-E, Manson J-AE, Knowles JC, et al. Polylactic acid - phosphate glass composite foams as scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 2007;80:322-31.
10. Hu Y, Grainger DW, Winn SR, Hollinger JO. Fabrication of poly(alpha-hydroxy acid) foam scaffolds using multiple solvent systems. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;59(3):563-72. (Pubitemid 34037501)
11. Mathieu LM, Montjovent M-O, Bourban P-E, Pioletti DP, Manson J-AE. Bioresorbable composites prepared by supercritical fluid foaming. J. Biomed Mater Res A 2005;75:89-97. (Pubitemid 41298190)
12. Nam YS, Park TG. Porous biodegradable polymeric scaffolds prepared by thermally induced phase separation. J Biomed Mat Res 1999;47:8-17. (Pubitemid 29344964)
13. Gualandi C, White LJ, Chen L, Gross RA, Shakesheff KM, Howdle SM, et al. Scaffold for tissue engineering fabricated by non-isothermal supercritical carbon dioxide foaming of a highly crystalline polyester. Acta Biomater 2010;6(1):130-6.
14. Teng X, Ren J, Gu S. Preparation and characterization of porous PDLLA/HA composite foams by supercritical carbon dioxide technology. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2007;81:185-93. (Pubitemid 46493629)
15. Kanczler JM, Ginty PJ, White L, Clarke NM, Howdle SM, Shakesheff KM, et al. The effect of the delivery of vascular endothelial growth factor and bone morphogenic protein-2 to osteoprogenitor cell populations on bone formation. Biomaterials 2010;31(6):1242-50.
16. Kim SS, Ahn KM, Park MS, Lee JH, Choi CY, Kim BS. A poly(lactide - coglycolide)/hydroxyapatite composite scaffold with enhanced osteoconductivity. J Biomed Mater Res A 2007;80(1):206-15. (Pubitemid 44913348)
17. Khan Y, Yaszemski MJ, Mikos AG, Laurencin CT. Tissue engineering of bone: material and matrix considerations. J Bone Joint Surg 2008;9:36-42. (Pubitemid 351329119)
18. Rezwan K, Chen QZ, Blaker JJ, Boccacini AR. Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2006;27(18):3413-31.
19. Wang Y, Zhang L, Hu M, Liu H, Wen W, Xiao H, et al. Synthesis and characterization of collagen - chitosan - hydroxyapatite artificial bone matrix. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008;86(1):244-52. (Pubitemid 351799505)
20. 2 dispersion of nanoclays and polymer clay nanocomposites. Polymer 2006;47:7485-96.
21. Manitiu M, Bellair RJ, Horsch S, Gulari E, Kannan RM. Supercritical carbon dioxide-processed dispersed polystyrene - clay nanocomposites. Macromolecules 2008;41(21):8038-46.
22. Pavlidou S, Papspyrides CD. A review on polymer-layered silicate nanocomposites. Prog Poly Sci 2008;33:1119-98.
23. Ray SS, Okamoto M. Polymer/layered silicate nanocomposites: a review from preparation to processing. Prog Poly Sci 2003;23:1524-43.
24. Zeng C, Han X, Lee LJ, Koelling KW, Tomasko DL. Polymer-clay nanocomposite foams prepared using carbon dioxide. Adv Mater 2003;15(20):1743-7.
25. Giesen EBW, Ding M, Dalstra M, van Eijden TMGJ. Mechanical properties of cancellous bone in the human mandibular condyle are anisotropic. J Biomech 2001;34:799-803. (Pubitemid 32674358)
26. Jensen KS, Mosekilde L, Mosekilde L. A model of vertebral trabecular bone architectures and its mechanical properties. Bone 1990;11(6):417-23.
27. Mosekilde L, Mosekilde L. Normal vertebral body size and compressive strength: relations to age and to vertebral and iliac trabecular bone compressive strength. Bone 1986;7(3):207-12. (Pubitemid 17171902)
28. Yeni YN, Fyhrie DP. Finite element calculated uniaxial apparent stiffness is a consistent predictor of uniaxial apparent strength in human vertebral cancellous bone tested with different boundary conditions. J Biomech 2001;34:1649-54. (Pubitemid 33041381)
29. Ebbesen EN, Thomsen JS, Beck-Nielsen H, Nepper-Rasmussen HJ, Mosekilde L. Lumbar vertebral body compressive strength evaluated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, quantitative computed tomography and ashing. Bone 1999;25(6):713-24. (Pubitemid 29525438)
30. Haroun AA, Gamal-Eldeen A, Harding DR. Preparation, characterization and in vitro biological study of biomimetic three-dimensional gelatin - montmorillonite/cellulose scaffold for tissue engineering. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2009;20(12):2527-40.
31. Katti KS, Katti DR, Dash R. Synthesis and characterization of a novel chitosan/montmorillonite/hydroxyapatite nanocomposite for bone tissue engineering. Biomed Mater 2008;3(3):034122.