Haptic-based virtual environment design and modeling of motor skill assessment for Brain Injury PatientsRehabilitation

Computer-Aided Design and Applications

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 149-162

  Li, Yingjie ^a   Kaber, David B ^a   Tupler, Larry ^b   Lee, Yuan Shin ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Haptic interface; Rey osterrieth complex figure (ROCF); Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

BRAIN INJURY; CLINICAL PRACTICES; GENERAL APPROACH; HAPTIC FORCE; INTELLIGENT TOOLS; LABOR INTENSIVE; LATEST TECHNOLOGY; MOTOR SKILLS; NUMERICAL MODELS; PROTOTYPE SYSTEM; REHABILITATION PROCEDURES; REHABILITATION TRAINING; REY-OSTERRIETH COMPLEX FIGURE (ROCF); TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURIES; VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS; VR SYSTEMS; VR TECHNOLOGY;

BRAIN; HEALTH CARE; PATIENT REHABILITATION; RATING; VIRTUAL REALITY;

HAPTIC INTERFACES;

EID: 79960994674     PISSN: 16864360     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3722/cadaps.2011.149-162     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Aukstakalnis, S.; Blatner, D.: Silicon Mirage; The Art and Science of Virtual Reality: Peachpit Press Berkeley, CA, USA, 1992.
2. Chinnock, C.: Virtual reality in surgery and medicine, Hospital technology series, 13, 1994, 1.
3. Hamby, S. L.; Wilkins, J. W.; Barry, N. S.: Organizational quality on the Rey-Osterrieth and Taylor complex figure tests: a new scoring system, Psychological assessment, 5, 1993, 27-33.
4. Holden, M.; Todorov, E.; Callahan, J.; Bizzi, E.: Virtual environment training improves motor performance in two patients with stroke: case report, Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy, 23, 1999, 57.
5. Holden, M.; Todorov, E.: Use of virtual environments in motor learning and rehabilitation, Handbook of virtual environment technology. London: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2002, 999-1026.
6. Jacko, J.; Sears, A.: The human-computer interaction handbook: fundamentals, evolving technologies, and emerging applications: CRC Press, 2003, 628-629.
7. Knight, J. A.; Kaplan, E.: The handbook of Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Usage: clinical and research applications: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc., Lutz, FL, 2003.
8. Lezak, M. D.: Neuropsychological assessment: Oxford University Press New York, 1995.
9. Lezak, M. D.: Neuropsychological assessment: Oxford University Press, USA, 2004.
10. [Li, Y.; Kaber, D.; Lee, Y.-S.: Investigating surgical simulator fidelity and the effects of system lag on human performance, in Proceedings of IEA2009 17th World Congress on Ergonomics, Beijing, China, 2009, paper (CD) number: 2HS010.
11. [Li, Y.; Mosaly, P.; Kaber, D.: A Comparison of Haptic Devices for Computer-based Assessment of Motor-Control Disabilities, in Proceedings of IEA2009 17th World Congress on Ergonomics, Beijing, China, 2009, paper (CD) number: 2HS002.
12. Lin, S.; Narayan, R.; Lee, Y.-S.: Hybrid Client-Server Architecture and Control Techniques for Collaborative Product Development Using Haptic Interfaces, Computers in Industry, 61, 2009, 83-96.doi:10.1016/j.compind.2009.07.004
13. Lin, S.; Narayan, R; Lee, Y.-S.: Heterogeneous material modelling and virtual prototyping with 5- DOF haptic force feedback for product development, International Journal of Mechatronics and Manufacturing Systems, 1, 2008, 43-67. doi:10.1504/IJMMS.2008.018274
14. McCloy, R.; Stone, R.: Virtual reality in surgery, 323, 2001, 912-915.
15. Moline, J.: Virtual reality for healthcare: a survey, Studies in health technology and informatics, 1997, 3-34.
16. Mullins, J.; Mawson, C.; Nahavandi, S.: Haptic handwriting aid for training and rehabilitation, 2005, 2690-2694.
17. Norcross, J.; Hedges, M.; Prochaska, J.: The face of 2010: A Delphi poll on the future of psychotherapy, PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 33, 2002, 316-322.
18. Nudo, R.; Milliken, G.; Jenkins, W.; Merzenich, M.: Use-dependent alterations of movement representations in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys, Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 1996, 785.
19. Osterrieth, P. A.: Filetest de copied'une figure complexe, Archives de Psychologie, 30, 1944, 206-356.
20. Riva, G.; Wiederhold, B. K.; Molinari, E.: Virtual environments in clinical psychology and neuroscience: Methods and techniques in advanced patient-therapist interaction: Ios Pr Inc, 1998.
21. Riva, G.; Davide, F.: Communications through virtual technologies: identity, Community and technology in the communication age: Ios Pr Inc, 2001.
22. Rizzo, A.; Buckwalter, J.; van der Zaag, C.; Neumann, U.; Thiebaux, M.; Chua, C.; Van Rooyen, A.; Humphrey, L.; Larson, P.: Virtual environment applications in clinical neuropsychology, The Handbook of Virtual Environments, 2002, 1027-1064.
23. Rose, F.; Brooks, B.; Rizzo, A.: Virtual reality in brain damage rehabilitation: review, Cyberpsychology& behavior, 8, 2005, 241-262. doi:10.1089/cpb.2005.8.241
24. Sano, M.; Kishibe, H.: Parameter identification of a fuzzy model on the handwritingprocess of an arabic letter, Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2001. Proceedings. 10th IEEE International Workshop on, 574-579, 2001.
25. Sheik-Nainar, M.; Kaber, D.: The utility of a virtual reality locomotion interface for studying gait behavior, Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 49, 2007, 696.doi:10.1518/001872007X215773
26. Stanney, K.: Handbook of virtual environments: Design, implementation, and applications: CRC, 2002.
27. Sveistrup, H.: Motor rehabilitation using virtual reality, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 1, 2004, 10. doi:10.1186/1743-0003-1-10
28. Wignall, G.; Denstedt, J.; Preminger, G.; Cadeddu, J.; Pearle, M.; Sweet, R. McDougall, E.: Surgical simulation: a urological perspective, The Journal of Urology, 179, 2008, 1690-1699. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2008.01.014