Using Priority Inheritance techniques to override the size limit of CAN messages

IFAC Proceedings Volumes (IFAC-PapersOnline)

Volumn 7, Issue PART 1, 2007, Pages 127-134

  Bartolini, Cesare ^a   Lipari, Giuseppe ^a   Almeida, Luís ^b  

^a SCUOLA SUPERIORE SANT ANNA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AVEIRO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

CAN bus; Embedded system; Fixed priority; Resource management

Indexed keywords

EFFICIENCY; NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; RESPONSE TIME (COMPUTER SYSTEMS);

CAN BUS; CURRENT ANALYSIS; FIXED PRIORITIES; ITS EFFICIENCIES; REAL-TIME PROPERTIES; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT POLICY; TIMING CONSTRAINTS;

EMBEDDED SYSTEMS;

EID: 79960994671     PISSN: 14746670     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3182/20071107-3-fr-3907.00018     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Audsley, A.N., A. Burns, M. Richardson and K. Tindell (1993). Applying new scheduling theory to static priority pre-emptive scheduling. Software Engineering Journal 8, 284-292.
2. Bosch GmbH, R. (1991). CAN specification 2.0.
3. Broster, I. (2003). Flexibility in Dependable Communication. PhD thesis. University of York.
4. Davis, R.I., A. Burns, R.J. Bril and J.J. Lukkien (2007). Controller area network (CAN) schedulability analysis: Refuted, revisited and revised. Real-time Systems 35(3), 239-272. (Pubitemid 46223453)
5. Davis, R.I., N. Merriam and N. Tracey (2000). How embedded applications using an RTOS can stay within on-chip memory limits. In: Proceedings of the Work in Progress and Industrial Experience Session, Euromicro Conference on Real-Time Systems. Euromicro.
6. Di Natale, M. (2000). Scheduling the CAN bus with earliest deadline techniques. In: Proceedings of the 21st IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium. IEEE. pp. 259-268. (Pubitemid 32191685)
7. Ferreira, J., A. Oliveira, P. Fonseca and J. Fonseca (2004). An experiment to assess bit error rate in CAN. In: Proc. of RTN 2004 - the 3rd Int. Workshop on Real-Time Networks.
8. Ferreira, J., L. Almeida and J. Fonseca (2005). Bus guardians for CAN: a taxonomy and a comparative study. In: Proc. of WDAS 2005 - Int. Workshop on Dependable Automation Systems.
9. Johansson, K.H., M. Törngren and L. Nielsen (2005). Vehicle applications of controller area network. In: Handbook of Networked and Embedded Control Systems. pp. 741-766.Birkhauser.
10. Joseph, M. and P. Pandya (1985). Finding response times in a real-time system. The Computer Journal (British Computer Society) 29(5), 390-395.
11. Lehoczky, J.P. (1990). Fixed priority scheduling of periodic task sets with arbitrary deadlines. In: Proceedings of the 11th IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium. pp. 201-209.
12. Lima, G. and A. Burns (2003). A consensus protocol for CAN-based systems. In: Proc. of RTSS 2003 - IEEE Symp. on Real-Time Systems.
13. Pedreiras, P. and L. Almeida (2002). EDF message scheduling on controller area network. Computing & Control Engineering Journal pp. 163-170. (Pubitemid 34979968)
14. Richardson, P., L. Sieh and P. Haniak (2001). A real-time control network protocol for embedded systems using controller area network(CAN). In: Proceedings of the IEEE Electronics and Information Technology Conference. IEEE.
15. Rufino, J., P. Verissimo, G. Arroz, C. Almeida and L. Rodigues (1998). Fault-tolerant broadcast in CAN. In: Proc. of FTCS 1998 - IEEE Symp. on Fault-Tolerant Systems.
16. Sha, L., R. Rajkumar and J.P. Lehoczky (1990). Priority inheritance protocols: an approach to real-time synchronization. IEEE Transactions on Computers 39(9), 1175-1185.
17. Tindell, K., A. Burns and A. Wellings (1995). Calculating controller area network (CAN) message response times.
18. Tindell, K. and H. Hansson (1995). Babbling idiots, the dual-priority protocol, and smart can controllers. In: Proc. of 2nd Int. CAN Conference.