Validation of the brazilian version of the generic six-dimensional short form quality of life questionnaire (SF-6D Brazil);Validação da versão brasileira do questionário genérico de qualidade de vida short-form 6 dimensions (SF-6D Brasil)

Ciencia e Saude Coletiva

Volumn 16, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 3103-3110

  Campolina, Alessandro Gonçalves ^a   Bortoluzzo, Adriana Bruscato ^b   Ferraz, Marcos Bosi ^a   Ciconelli, Rozana Mesquita ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b INSPER INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION AND RESEARCH   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Health economics; Quality of life; Rheumatoid arthritis

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960991646     PISSN: 14138123     EISSN: 16784561     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s1413-81232011000800010     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30(6):473-483.
2. Garrat AM, Schmidt L, Mackintosh A, Fitzpatrick R. Quality of life measurement: bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures. BMJ 2002; 324(7351):1417-1421.
3. Torrance G W, Feeny D H. Utilities and Quality-Adjusted Life Years. Intl J of Technology Assessment in Health Care 1989; 5(4):559-575.
4. Prieto L, Sacristán JA. Problems and solutions in calculating quality-adjusted life years (QALY's). Health Qual of Life Outcomes 2003; 1:80.
5. Nichol MB, Sengupta N, Globe DR. Evaluating quality-adjusted life years: estimation of the health utility index (HUI2) from the SF-36. Med Decis Making 2001; 21(2):105-112.
6. Torrance GW. Social preferences for health states: An empirical evaluation of three measurement techniques. Socioecon Plan Sci 1976; 10(3):128-136.
7. Kaplan R M, Bush J W, Berry C. Health status: Types of validity and the index of well-being. Health Serv Res 1976; 11(4):478-507.
8. Torrance GW. Designing and Conducting Cost-Utility Analyses. In: Spilker B, organizador. Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. Philadelphia(USA): Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1996. p. 1105-1111.
9. Brazier J, Usherwood T, Harper R, Thomas K. Deriving a preference-based single index from the UK SF-36 Health Survey. J Clin Epidemiol 1998; 51(11): 1115-28.
10. Lee TA, Hollingworth W, Sullivan SD. Comparison of directly elicited preference to preferences derived from the SF-36 in adults with asthma. Med Decis Making 2003; 23(4):323-334.
11. Kaplan RM, Groessl EJ, Sengupta N, Sieber WJ, Ganiats TG. Comparison of Measure Utility Scores and Imputed Scores From the SF-36 in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis. Med Care 2005; 43(1): 79-87.
12. Brazier JB, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. J Health Econ 2002; 21(2):271-292.
13. Gonçalves Campolina A, Bruscato Bortoluzzo A, Bosi Ferraz M, Mesquita Ciconelli R. Validity of the SF-6D index in Brazilian patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2009; 27(2):237-245.
14. Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA, McShane DJ, Fries JF, Cooper NS. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1988; 31(3):315-324.
15. Ciconelli RM, Ferraz MB, Santos W, Meinão I, Quaresma MR. Tradução para a língua portuguesa e validação do questionário genérico de avaliação de qualidade de vida SF-36 (Brasil SF-36). Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia 1999; 39(3):143-150.
16. Wolfe F, Kleinheksel SM, Cathey MA, Hawley DJ, Spitz PW, Fries JF. The clinical value of the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire functional disability index in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1988; 15(10):1480-1488.
17. Kind P. The performance characteristics of EQ-5D, a measure of health related quality of life for use in technology assessment [abstract]. Annual Meeting of International Society of Technology Assessment in Health Care 1997; 13(5):81.
18. Dolan P. Modeling Valuations for Euroqol Health States. Med Care 1997; 35(11):1095-1108.
19. Bennett KJ, Torrance GW. Measuring Health State Preferences and Utilities: Rating Scale, Time Trade-Off, and Standard Gamble Techniques. In: Spilker B, editor. Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials. Philadelphia(USA): Lippincott-Raven Publishers; 1996. p. 253-265.
20. Lenert L, Kaplan RM. Validity and Interpretation of preference-based measures of health-related quality of life. Med Care 2000; 28(Suppl. 2):138-150.
21. Torrance GW, Furlong W, Feeny D. Health utility estimation. Expert Rev Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res. 2002; 2(2):99-108.
22. Revicki D, Kaplan R. Relationship between psychometric and utility-based approaches to the measurement of health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res 1993; 2(6):477-487.
23. Ferraz MB, Oliveira LM, Atra E, Bennett K. Performance of the McMaster Rheumatoid Arthritis Measurement Questionaire in Brazilian Patients. J Rheumatol 1992; 19(12):1994-1995.
24. Longworth L, Bryan S. An empirical comparison of EQ-5D and SF-6D in liver transplant patients. Health Econ 2003; 12(2):1061-1067.
25. Hollingworth W, Deyo RA, Sullivan SD, Emerson SS, Gray DT, Jarvik JG. The practicality and validity of directly elicited and SF-36 derived health state preferences in patients with low back pain. Health Econ 2002; 11(1):71-85.
26. Bosch JL, Hunink MG. The relationship between descriptive and valuational quality of life measures in patients with intermittent claudication. Med Decis Making 1996; 16(6):217-25.
27. O' Brien BJ, Spath M, Blackhouse G, Severens JL, Dorian P, Brazier J. A view from the bridge: agreement between the SF-6D utility algorithm and the Health Utilities Index. Health Econ 2003; 12(11): 975-981.
28. Kopec JA, Willison KD. A comparative review of four preference-weighted measures of health-related quality of life. J Clin Epidemiol 2003; 56(4):317-325.
29. Conner-Spady B, Suarez-Almazor ME. Variation in the estimation of quality-adjusted life-years by different preference-based instruments. Med Care 2003; 41(7):791-801.
30. Fitzpatrick R, Fletcher A, Gore S, Jones D, Spiegelhalter D, Cox D. Quality of life measures in health care. I: Applications and issues in assessment BMJ 1992; 305(6861):1074-1077.