Content validity in the development and adaptation processes of measurement instruments;Validade de conteúdo nos processos de construção e adaptação de instrumentos de medidas

Ciencia e Saude Coletiva

Volumn 16, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 3061-3068

  Alexandre, Neusa Maria Costa ^a   Coluci, Marina Zambon Orpinelli ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Methods; Questionnaires; Reproducibility of results; Validation studies; Validity of tests

Indexed keywords

PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW;

PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 79960985372     PISSN: 14138123     EISSN: 16784561     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1413-81232011000800006     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. Marx RG, Bombardier C, Hogg-Johnson S, Wright JG. Clinimetric and psychometric strategies for development of a health measurement scale. J Clin Epidemiol 1999; 52(2):105-111.
2. Selby-Harrington ML, Mehta SM, Jutsum V, Riportella-Muller R, Quade D. Reporting of instrument validity and reliability in selected clinical nursing journals. J Prof Nurs 1994; 10(1):47-56.
3. Salmond SS. Evaluating the reliability and validity of measurement instruments. Orthop Nurs 2008; 27(1):28-30.
4. Dempsey PA, Dempsey AD. Using nursing research. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1996.
5. De Vet HCW, Terwee CB, Bouter LM. Current challenges in clinimetrics. J Clin Epidemiol 2003; 56:1137-1141.
6. Fayers PM, Machin D. Quality of life. Assessment, analysis and interpretation. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons; 2000.
7. Fitzner K. Reliability and validity. Diabetes Educ 2007; 33(5):775-780.
8. Frost MH, Reeve BB, Liepa AM, Stauffer JW, Hays RD. What is sufficient for reliability and validity of patient-reported outcome measures? Value Health 2007; 10(Supl. 2):S94-S105.
9. Esperidião M, Trad, LAB. Avaliação de satisfação de usuários. Cien Saude Colet 2005; 10(Supl.):303-312.
10. Sireci SG. The construct of content validity. Soc Indic Res 1998; 45:83-117.
11. Roberts P, Priest H, Traynor M. Reliability and validity in research. Nurs Stand 2006; 20(44):41-45.
12. a ed. São Paulo: Hucitec, Abrasco; 1999.
13. LoBiondo-Wood G, Harber J. Nursing Research: methods, critical appraisal, e and utilization. 4th ed. St Louis: Mosby-Year Book; 1998.
14. Burns N, Grove SK. The practice of nursing research: conduct, critique & utilization. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders Company; 1997.
15. Mendonça KMPP, Guerra RO. Desenvolvimento e validação de um instrumento de medida da satisfação do paciente com a fisioterapia. Rev Bras Fisioter 2007; 11(5):369-376.
16. Habib ES, Magalhães LC. Criação de questionário para detecção de comportamentos atípicos em bebês. Rev Bras Fisioter 2007; 11(3):177-183.
17. Beyea S, Nicoll LH. Writing an integrative review. AORN J 1998; 67(4):877-880.
18. Wynd CA, Schmidt B, Schaefer MA. Two quantitative approaches for estimating content validity. West J Nurs Res 2003; 25(5):508-518.
19. Haynes SN, Richard DCS, Kubany ES. Content validity in psychological assessment: a functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychol Assess 1995; 7(3):238-247.
20. Rubio DM, Berg-Weger M, Tebb SS, Lee S, Rauch S. Objectifying content validity: conducting a content validity study in social work research. Soc Work Res 2003; 27(2):94-105.
21. a ed. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas; 1995.
22. Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recomendationas. Res Nurs Health 2006; 29:489-497.
23. Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res 1986; 35(6):382-385.
24. a ed. Petrópolis (RJ): Editora Vozes; 2004.
25. DeVon HA, Block ME, Moyle-Wright P, Ernst DM, Hayden SJ, Lazzara DJ, Savoy SM, Kostas-Polston E. A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. J Nurs Scholarsh 2007; 39(2):155-64.
26. Carmines EG, Zeller RA. Reliability and validity assessment. 11th ed. Beverly Hills (CA): Sage; 1988.
27. Grant JS, Davis LL. Selection and use of content experts for instrument development. Res Nurs Health 1997; 20(3):269-274.
28. Berk RA. Importance of expert judgment in content-related validity evidence. West J Nurs Res 1990; 12(5):659-671.
29. Kirshner B, Guyatt G. A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J Chron Dis 1985; 38(1): 27-36.
30. Pasquali L. Princípios de elaboração de escalas psicológicas. Rev Psiquiatr Clin 1998; 25(5): 206-13.
31. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002.
32. Hunt SM, Bucquet D, Niero M, Wiklund I, McKenna S. Cross-cultural adaptation of health measures. Health Policy 1991; 19(44):33-44.
33. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton, D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46(12):1417-1432.
34. Guillemin F. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of health status measures. Scand J Rheumatol 1995; 24(2):61-63.
35. Hutchinson A, Bentzen N, Konig-Zanhn C. Cross cultural health outcome assessment: a user's guide. The Netherlands: ERGHO; 1996.
36. Alexandre NMC, Guirardello EB. Adaptación cultural de instrumentos utilizados em salud ocupacional. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2002; 11(2):109-111.
37. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 2000; 25(24): 3186-3191.
38. Davis LL. Instrument review: getting the most from a panel of experts. Appl Nurs Res 1992; 5(4):194-197.
39. Tilden VP, Nelson CA, May BA. Use of qualitative methods to enhance content validity. Nurs Res 1990; 39(3):172-175.
40. Hyrkäs K, Appelqvist-Schmidlechner K, Oksa L. Validating an instrument for clinical supervision using an expert panel. Int J Nurs Stud 2003; 40(6):619-625.
41. McGilton K. Development and psychometric evaluation of supportive leadership scales. Can J Nurs Res 2003; 35(4):72-86.
42. Morse JM. Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nurs Res 1991; 40(1): 120-123.
43. a ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2003.
44. Topf M. Three estimates of interrater reliability for nominal data. Nurs Res 1986; 35(4):253-245.
45. Wynd CA, Schaefer MA. The Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Tool: establishing content validity through a panel of experts. Appl Nurs Res 2002; 16(2):184-188.
46. a ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2006.