Disagreements about taste

Philosophical Studies

Volumn 155, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 267-288

  Sundell, Timothy ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Aesthetics; Contextualism; Disagreement; Philosophy of language; Relativism; Taste

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960983777     PISSN: 00318116     EISSN: 15730883     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11098-010-9572-6     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Anand, P., & Nevins, A. (2004). Shifty operators in changing contexts. In R. Young (Ed.), Proceedings of semantics and linguistic theory 14 (pp. 26-37). Itaca: CLC Publications.
2. Barker, C. (2002). The dynamics of vagueness. Linguistics and Philosophy, 25, 1-36.
3. Cappelen, H., & Hawthorne, J. (2009). Relativism and Monadic Truth. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. DeRose, K. (1991). Epistemic possibilities. Philosophical Review, 100, 581-605.
5. DeRose, K. (2004). Single scoreboard semantics. Philosophical Studies, 119, 1-21.
6. Egan, A. (2007). Epistemic modals, relativism, and assertion. Philosophical Studies, 133, 1-22.
7. Egan, A. (2010). De Gustibus Non Disputandum Est (At Least, Not Always). In R. Feldman & T. Warfield (Eds.), Disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Egan, A., Hawthorne, J., & Weatherson, B. (2005). Epistemic modals in context. In G. Preyer & G. Peter (Eds.), Contextualism in philosophy: Knowledge, meaning, and truth (pp. 131-170). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Gibbard, A. (2008). Thinking how to live. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
10. Glanzberg, M. (2007). Context, content, and relativism. Philosophical Studies, 136, 1-29.
11. Horn, L. (1989). A natural history of negation. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
12. Kaplan, D. (1989). Demonstratives. In J. Almog, et al. (Eds.), Themes from Kaplan. New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Kennedy, C. (1999). Projecting the adjective: The syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison. New York: Garland (1997 UCSC Ph. D thesis).
14. Lasersohn, P. (2005). Context dependence, disagreement, and predicates of personal taste. Linguistics and Philosophy, 28, 643-686.
15. Ludlow, P. (2008). Cheap contextualism. Philosophical Issues, 18, 104-129.
16. MacFarlane, J. (2007). Relativism and disagreement. Philosophical Studies, 132, 17-31.
17. Schlenker, P. (2003). A plea for monsters. Linguistics & Philosophy, 26(1), 29-120.
18. Schroeder, M. (2010). Being for: Evaluating the semantic program of expressivism. New York: Oxford University Press.
19. Stalnaker, R. (1978). Assertion. Syntax and Semantics, 9, 315-332. Also in Stalnaker 1999, ch. 4.
20. Stephenson, T. (2007). Judge dependence, epistemic modals, and predicates of personal taste. Linguistics and Philosophy, 30, 487-525.
21. van der Sandt, R., & Meier, E. (2003). Denials in discourse. Michigan linguistics and philosophy workshop (ms., University of Nijmegen).
22. von Fintel, K., & Gillies, A. (2008). CIA leaks. Philosophical Review, 117, 77-98.