Identifying the ethics of emerging information and communication technologies: An essay on issues, concepts and method

International Journal of Technoethics

Volumn 1, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 20-38

  Stahl, Bernd Carsten ^a   Heersmink, Richard ^b   Goujon, Philippe ^c   Flick, Catherine ^c   Van Den Hoven, Jeroen ^b   Wakunuma, Kutoma J ^a   Ikonen, Veikko ^d   Rader, Michael ^e  

^a DE MONTFORT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NAMUR   (Belgium)

^d VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND   (Finland)

^e KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Concepts; Emerging ICT; Ethical ANALYSIS; Ethics; Methodology

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960983482     PISSN: 19473451     EISSN: 1947346X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jte.2010100102     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2008). Principles of Biomedical Ethics (6th ed.). New York: OUP.
2. Bijker, W. E. (1997). Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Brey, P., & Soraker, J. H. (2009). Philosophy of Computing and Information Technology. In Gabbay, D. M., Meijers, A. W., Woods, J., & Thagard, P. (Eds.), Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences (Vol. 9, pp. 1341-1408). New York: North Holland. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-51667-1.50051-3
4. Bynum, T. (2008). Computer and Information Ethics. Retrieved December 4, 2008, from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-computer/
5. Cadili, S., & Whitley, E. A. (2005). On the interpretative flexibility of hosted ERP systems. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 14(2), 167-195. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2005.04.006 (Pubitemid 41068396)
6. Callon, M., Lascoumes, P., & Barthe, Y. (2009). Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Charmaz, A. B. A. K. (2007). The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Ltd.
8. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Cuhls, K. (2003). From forecasting to foresight processes - new participative foresight activities in Germany. Journal of Forecasting, 22(2-3), 93-111. doi:10.1002/for.848
10. Dusek, V. (2006). Philosophy of Technology: an Introduction. New York: Wiley Blackwell.
11. Floridi, L. (Ed.). (2010). The Cambridge Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12. Genus, A., & Coles, A. (2005). On Constructive Technology Assessment and Limitations on Public Participation in Technology Assessment. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 17(4), 433-443. doi:10.1080/09537320500357251 (Pubitemid 43135426)
13. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1999). Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Piscataway, NJ: AldineTransaction.
14. Grint, K., & Woolgar, S. (1997). The Machine at Work: Technology, Work and Organization. New York: Polity Press.
15. Heersmink, R., van den Hoven, J., van Eck, N. J., & van den Berg, J. (2011). A Bibliometrical Study of Computer and Information Ethics. Ethics and Information Technology.
16. Himma, K. E., & Tavani, H. T. (Eds.). (2008). The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics. New York: Wiley. doi:10.1002/9780470281819
17. Howcroft, D., Mitev, N., & Wilson, M. (2004). What We May Learn from the Social Shaping of Technology Approach. In Mingers, J., & Willcocks, L. P. (Eds.), Social Theory and Philosophy for Information Systems (pp. 329-371). New York: Wiley.
18. Johnson, D. G. (1985). Computer Ethics (1st ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
19. Joss, S. (2002). Toward the Public Sphere-Reflections on the Development of Participatory Technology Assessment. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 22(3), 220-231 .doi:10.1177/02767602022003006 (Pubitemid 34690570)
20. Joss, S., & Belucci, S. (Eds.). (2002). Participatory Technology Assessment: European Perspectives. London: University of Westminster, Centre for the Study of Democracy.
21. Latour, B. (2007). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford, UK: OUP.
22. Law, J., & Hassard, J. (1999). Actor Network Theory and After. New York: Wiley Blackwell
23. Moor, J. H. (1985). What is computer ethics. Metaphilosophy, 16(4), 266-275. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9973.1985.tb00173.x
24. Moor, J. H. (2008). Why we need better ethics for emerging technologies. In Hoven, J. V. D., & Weckert, J. (Eds.), Information Technology and Moral Philosophy (pp. 26-39). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511498725.003
25. Olsen, J. B., Pedersen, S. A., & Hendricks, V. F. (2009). A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology. New York: Wiley Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781444310795
26. Ricoeur, P. (1990). Soi-même comme un autre. Paris: Seuil.
27. Sollie, P. (2007). Ethics, technology development and uncertainty: an outline for any future ethics of technology. Journal of Information. Communication & Ethics in Society, 5(4), 293-306. doi:10.1108/ 14779960710846155
28. Sollie, P., & Düwell, M. (Eds.). (2009). Evaluating New Technologies: Methodological Problems for the Ethical Assessment of Technology Developments. New York: Springer.
29. Stephan, S., Wütscher, F., Decker, M., & Ladikas, M. (2004). Bridges Between Science, Society and Policy: Technology Assessment - Methods and Impacts. New York: Springer.
30. Strauss, A. C., & Corbin, J. (1997). Grounded Theory in Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
31. Swierstra, T., & Rip, A. (2007). Nano-ethics as NESTethics: Patterns of Moral Argumentation About New and Emerging Science and Technology. NanoEthics, 1(1), 3-20. .doi:10.1007/s11569-007-0005-8
32. van den Hoven, J. (2010). The use of normative theories in computer ethics. In Floridi, E. B. L. (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33. van den Hoven, J., & Weckert, J. (2008). Information Technology and Moral Philosophy (1st ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511498725
34. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2006). VOS: a new method for visualizing similarities between objects. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the German Classification Society, Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization (pp. 299-306).
35. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2009). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 1-16.
36. Van Eck, N. J., Waltman, L., & van den Berg, J. (2005). A novel algorithm for visualizing concept associations. In Proceedings of the Database and Expert Systems Applications, Advances in Data Analysis, Sixteenth International Workshop (pp. 405-409).
37. Velasquez, M. G. (2001). Business Ethics: Concepts and Cases (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.