Utilization of minimally invasive breast biopsy for the evaluation of suspicious breast lesions

American Journal of Surgery

Volumn 202, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 127-132

  Gutwein, Luke G ^a   Ang, Darwin N ^a   Liu, Huazhi ^a   Marshall, Julia K ^a   Hochwald, Steven N ^a   Copeland, Edward M ^a   Grobmyer, Stephen R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Agency for Health Care Administration; Biopsy; Breast cancer; Diagnosis; Florida; Image detected; Image guided biopsy; Mammogram; Open surgical biopsy; Stereotactic; Surgery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST LESION; DATA BASE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PATIENT CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADENOMA; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; BREAST NEOPLASMS, MALE; CRYOSURGERY; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; FELLOWSHIPS AND SCHOLARSHIPS; FEMALE; FIBROADENOMA; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; PAPILLOMA, INTRADUCTAL; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY; VACUUM;

EID: 79960981118     PISSN: 00029610     EISSN: 18791883     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Silverstein MJ, Recht A, Lagios MD, et al. Special report: consensus conference III. Image-detected breast cancer: state-of-the-art diagnosis and treatment. J Am Coll Surg 2009;209:504-20.
2. Silverstein MJ, Lagios MD, Recht A, et al. Image-detected breast cancer: state of the art diagnosis and treatment. J Am Coll Surg 2005;201:586-97. (Pubitemid 41393082)
3. American Society of Breast Surgeons. Official consensus statement of percutaneous needle biopsy for image detected breast abnormalities. Available at: http://www.breastsurgeons.org. Accessed December 5, 2006.
4. Lind DS, Minter R, Steinbach B, et al. Stereotactic core biopsy reduces the reexcision rate and the cost of mammographically detected cancer. J Surg Res 1998;78:23-6. (Pubitemid 28419188)
5. Clarke-Pearson EM, Jacobson AF, Boolbol SK, et al. Quality assurance initiative at one institution for minimally invasive breast biopsy as the initial diagnostic technique. J Am Coll Surg 2009;208:75-8.
6. Silverstein M. Where's the outrage? J Am Coll Surg 2009;208:78-9.
7. Edge SB, Ottesen RA, Lepisto EM, et al. Surgical biopsy to diagnose breast cancer adversely affects outcomes of breast cancer care: finding from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Presented at: San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; San Antonio, TX; 2005.
8. Florida Agency for Health Care Administration. Home page. Available at: http://ahca.myflorida.com/#. Accessed February 23, 2010.
9. Florida Agency for Health Care Administration. Available at: http://www.floridahealthfinder.gov/researchers/researchers.aspx. Accessed February 23, 2010.
10. Witmer MT, Margo CE. Analysis of ophthalmology workforce and delivery of emergency department eye care in Florida. Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:1522-7.
11. Armitage P. Tests for linear trends in proportions and frequencies. Biometrics 1955;11:375-86.
12. Bruening W, Schoelles K, Treadwell J, et al. Comparative effectiveness of core-needle biopsies and open surgical biopsy for the diagnosis of breast lesions. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2009.
13. Friese CR, Neville BA, Edge SB, et al. Breast biopsy patterns and outcomes in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data. Cancer 2009;115:716-24.
14. Silverstein M, Levine GM. Reply to: "Minimally invasive breast biopsy." J Am Coll Surg 2009;209:289.
15. Paajanen H, Hermunen H. Does preoperative core needle biopsy increase surgical site infections in breast cancer surgery? Randomized study of antibiotic prophylaxis. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2009;10:317-21.