Enhanced methane production from ultrasound pre-treated and hygienized dairy cattle slurry

Waste Management

Volumn 31, Issue 9-10, 2011, Pages 2174-2179

  Luste, Sami ^a   Luostarinen, Sari ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

^b FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Anaerobic digestion; Cattle slurry; Hygienization; Methane; Pre treatment; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

CATTLE SLURRY; DAIRY CATTLES; HYGIENIZATION; METHANE PRODUCTION; PRE-TREATMENT; PRE-TREATMENTS; SPECIFIC METHANOGENIC ACTIVITY; TOTAL SOLIDS; VOLATILE SOLID;

BIODEGRADATION; HYDROLYSIS; METHANE; SLURRY PIPELINES; ULTRASONICS;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION;

METHANE; NITROGEN;

ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BIODEGRADATION; CATTLE; ENERGY BALANCE; HYDROLYSIS; METHANE; METHANOGENESIS; NITROGEN; SLURRY;

AGRICULTURAL SLURRY; ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ARTICLE; BATCH PROCESS; BIODEGRADABILITY; BIOMASS PRODUCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAIRY CATTLE; ENERGY BALANCE; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; ENERGY YIELD; HEAT TREATMENT; HYDROLYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; SCREENING TEST; SOLUBILIZATION; ULTRASOUND;

ANIMALS; BIOFUELS; CATTLE; MANURE; METHANE; ULTRASONICS;

BOS;

EID: 79960953812     PISSN: 0956053X     EISSN: 18792456     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.04.012     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Ahring B., Ibrahim A., Mladenovska Z. Effect of temperature increase from 55 to 65°C on performance and microbial population dynamics of an anaerobic reactor treating cattle manure. Water Res. 2001, 35:2446-2452.
2. Alvarez R., Lidén G. Semi-continuous co-digestion of solid slaughterhouse waste, manure, and fruit and vegetable waste. Renew. Energy 2008, 33:726-734.
3. Amon B., Kryvoruchko V., Amon T., Zechmeister-Boltenstern S. Methane, nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions during storage and after application of dairy cattle slurry and influence of slurry treatment. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2006, 112:153-162.
4. Angelidaki I., Ahring B.K. Methods for increasing the biogas potential from the recalcitrant organic matter contained in manure. Water Sci. Technol. 2000, 41:189-194.
5. Bougrier C., Carrère H., Delgenès J. Solubilisation of waste-activated sludge by ultrasonic treatment. Chem. Eng. J. 2005, 106:163-169.
6. Bougrier C., Albasi C., Delgenès J., Carrère H. Effect of ultrasonic, thermal and ozone pre-treatments on waste activated sludge solubilisation and anaerobic biodegradability. Chem. Eng. Process 2006, 45:711-718.
7. Clemens J., Trimborn M., Weiland P., Amon B. Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions by anaerobic digestion of cattle slurry. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2006, 112:171-177.
8. Crestini C., Pro P., Neri V., Saladino R. Methyltrioxorhenium: a new catalyst for the activation of hydrogen peroxide to the oxidation of lignin and lignin model compounds. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2005, 13:2569-2578.
9. Chu C., Leea D., Changb B., Youb C., Tayc J. ''Weak'' ultrasonic pre-treatment on anaerobic digestion of flocculated activated biosolids. Water Res. 2002, 36:2681-2688.
10. Davidsson Å., la Cour Jansen J., Appelqvist B., Gruvberger C., Hallmer M. Anaerobic digestion potential of urban organic waste: a case study in Malmö. Waste Manage. Res. 2007, 25:162-169.
11. Dewil R., Baeyens J., Goutvrind R. The use of ultrasonics in the treatment of waste activated sludge. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2006, 14:105-113.
12. European Parliament and Council (EC), 2002. Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 October 2002 laying down health rules concerning animal by-products not intended for human consumption. OJEU. L273.
13. Ferrer I., Ponsá S., Vázquez F., Font X. Increasing biogas production by thermal (70°C) sludge pre-treatment prior to thermophilic anaerobic digestion. Biochem. Eng. J. 2008, 42:186-192.
14. Gavala H., Yenal U., Skiadas I., Westermann P., Ahring B. Mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of primary and secondary sludge, effect of pre-treatment at elevate temperature. Water Res. 2003, 37:4561-4572.
15. Government Council (DC) of Finland, 2000. Decree No. 931/2000 of the Council of State of 4 February 2000 on limiting the accession of nitrates from agriculture to waters. Statutes of Finland, 2000. Helsinki. (in Finnish).
16. Hartmann H., Angelidaki I., Ahring B.K. Increase of anaerobic degradation of particulate organic matter in full-scale biogas plants by mechanical maceration. Water Sci. Technol. 2000, 41:145-153.
17. Joki-Tokola, E., 1998. The effect of the slurry spreading season, applications and effect of the aeration on the quality and amount of the stored fodder. In: Mattila, P. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Scientific Publications from Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry A44, 2002. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Finland, pp. 20. (in Finnish).
18. Kaparaju, P., Rintala, J., in press. Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions by adopting anaerobic digestion technology on dairy, sow and pig farms in Finland. Renew. Energy.
19. Kapuinen, P., Perälä, P., Regina, K., 2008. Digestion effect on fertilizing quality of cattle slurry with grass. In: Hopponen, A. (Ed.), Proceedings of Finnish Club of Agricultural Science 23: 7. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Finland, pp. 7. (in Finnish).
20. Khanal S., Isik H., Sung S., van Leeuwen J. Ultrasound conditioning of waste activated sludge for enhanced aerobic digestion. In conference proceedings: sustainable sludge management: state of the art, challenges and perspectives 2006, IWA, Moscow, pp. 441-448.
21. Knudsen L., Birkmose T. Biogas - Agriculture and environment. Proceedings from conference of the Future of Biogas in Europe 1997, 39-49. Biopress, Denmark. J. Holm-Nielsen (Ed.).
22. Lahtinen M., Kruus K., Boer H., Kemell M., Andberg M., Viikari L., Sipilä J. The effect of lignin model compound structure on the rate of oxidation catalyzed by two different fungal laccases. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzyme 2009, 57:204-210.
23. Larrea L., Forster C., Melé D. Changes in lignin during diffused air activated sludge treatment of kraft effluents. Water Res. 1989, 23:1073-1080.
24. Laurent J., Casellas M., Pons M., Dagot C. Flocs surface functionality assessment of sonicated activated sludge in relation with physico-chemical properties. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2009, 16:488-494.
25. Lehne G., Muller A., Schwedes J. Mechanical disintegration of sewage sludge. Water Sci. Technol. 2001, 43:19-26.
26. Lehtomäki A., Huttunen S., Rintala J. Laboratory investigations on co-digestion of energy crops and crop residues with cow manure for methane production: effect of crop to manure ratio. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2007, 51:591-609.
27. Luostarinen S., Luste S., Sillanpää M. Increased biogas production at wastewater treatment plants through co-digestion of sewage sludge with grease trap sludge from a meat processing plant. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100:79-85.
28. Luste S., Luostarinen S. Anaerobic co-digestion of meat-processing by-products and sewage sludge - Effect of hygienization and organic loading rate. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:2657-2664.
29. Luste S., Luostarinen S., Sillanpää M. Effect of pre-treatments on hydrolysis and methane production potentials of by-products from meat-processing industry. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 164:247-255.
30. Luste, S., Heinonen-Tanski, H., Luostarinen, S., unpublished results. Co-digestion of dairy cattle slurry and animal by-products from meat-processing industry - Effect of ultrasound and hygienization pre-treatments. Submitted 10.08.2010.
31. Mata-Alvarez J. Biomethanization of the Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Wastes 2003, IWA, London.
32. Mata-Alvarez J., Mace S., Llabrés P. Anaerobic digestion of organic solid wastes, an overview of research achievements and perspectives. Bioresour. Technol. 2000, 74:3-16.
33. Miron Y., Zeeman G., van Lier J., Lettinga G. The role of sludge retention time in the hydrolysis and acidification of lipids, carbohydrates and proteins during digestion of primary sludge in CSTR systems. Water Res. 2000, 34:1705-1713.
34. Ministry of the Environment, 2003. Greenhouse gas emissions in Finland 1990-2001. National Inventory Report to the UNFCCC Secretariat. Ministry of the Environment, Helsinki. (in Finnish) 03.09.2010. http://www.smts.fi/MTP%20julkaisu%202004/esi04/ti71.pdf.
35. Mladenovska Z., Hartmann H., Kvist T., Sales-Cruz M., Gani R., Ahring B. Thermal pretreatment of the solid fraction of manure: impact on the biogas reactor performance and microbial community. Water Sci. Technol. 2006, 53:59-67.
36. Mendes A., Pereira E., de Castro H. Effect of the enzymatic hydrolysis pre-treatment of lipids-rich wastewater on the anaerobic biodigestion. Biochem. Eng. J. 2006, 32:185-190.
37. Myint M., Nirmalakhandan N., Speece R. Anaerobic fermentation of cattle manure: modeling of hydrolysis and acidogenesis. Water Res. 2007, 41:323-332.
38. Møller H., Sommer S., Ahring B. Methane productivity of manure, straw and solid fractions of manure. Biomass Bioenergy 2004, 26:485-495.
39. Nielsen H., Mladenovska Z., Westermann P., Ahring B. Comparison of two-stage thermophilic (68/55°C) anaerobic digestion with one-stage thermophilic (55°C) digestion of cattle manure. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2004, 86:291-300.
40. Paavola T., Syväsalo E., Rintala J. Co-digestion of manure and biowaste according to the EC Animal By-products Regulation and Finnish national regulations. Water Sci. Technol. 2006, 53:223-231.
41. Palenzuela-Rollon, A., Ph.D. thesis. Anaerobic digestion of fish wastewater with special emphasis on hydrolysis of suspended solids, Balkema Publishers, Wageningen.
42. Salsabil M., Prorot A., Casellas M., Dagot C. Pre-treatment of activated sludge: effect of sonication on aerobic and anaerobic digestibility. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 148:327-335.
43. Tiehm A., Nickel K., Neis U. The use of ultrasound to accelerate the anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. Water Sci. Technol. 1997, 36:121-128.
44. Wang S., Wu X., Wang Y., Li Q., Tao M. Removal of organic matter and ammonia nitrogen from landfill leachate by ultrasound. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2008, 15:933-937.
45. Xu W., Nikolov A., Wasan D. Shear-induced fat particle structure variation and the stability of food emulsions: II. Effects of surfactants, protein, and fat substitutes. J. Food Eng. 2005, 66:107-114.