Environmental and socio-economic assessment of co-combustion of coal, biomass and non-hazardous wastes in a Power Plant

Resources, Conservation and Recycling

Volumn 55, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 1109-1118

  Morais, J ^a   Barbosa, R ^a   Lapa, N ^a   Mendes, B ^a   Gulyurtlu, I ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDADE NOVA DE LISBOA   (Portugal)

^b LABORATÓRIO NACIONAL DE ENERGIA E GEOLOGIA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Biomass; Co combustion; Environmental and socio economic assessment; Non hazardous wastes

Indexed keywords

AVOIDED EMISSIONS; CHEMICAL SPECIES; COCOMBUSTION; COMBUSTION OF COAL; COMBUSTION TEST; COST OF ELECTRICITY; EUROPEAN PROJECT; GERMANY; GHG EMISSION; MEAT AND BONE MEAL; NON HAZARDOUS WASTES; OZONE DEPLETION; SOCIO-ECONOMICS; WOOD PELLET;

BIOMASS; COAL; ENERGY CONVERSION; EUTROPHICATION; FOSSIL FUEL POWER PLANTS; GLOBAL WARMING; GREENHOUSE GASES; HAZARDOUS MATERIALS; OZONE; OZONE LAYER; RATING; SEWAGE SLUDGE; STEAM POWER PLANTS; WASTE INCINERATION;

COAL COMBUSTION;

COAL;

BIOMASS; COAL; COMBUSTION; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; POWER PLANT; SEWAGE; SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS; WASTE DISPOSAL;

ARTICLE; BIOENERGY; BIOMASS ENERGY; BIOMASS PRODUCTION; COMBUSTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST CONTROL; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; ELECTRIC POWER PLANT; ENERGY COST; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; EUTROPHICATION; GREENHOUSE GAS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; OZONE DEPLETION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SLUDGE; SOCIOECONOMICS; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

DUISBURG; GERMANY; NORTH RHINE-WESTPHALIA;

EID: 79960950059     PISSN: 09213449     EISSN: 18790658     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.06.011     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Bauer C. Life cycle assessment of fossil and biomass power generation chains. Paul Scherrer Institute, Laboratory for Energy Systems Analysis (LEA), Technology Assessment Group, PSI Bericht Nr. 08-05; 2008. ISSN: 1019-0643.
2. Biewinga EE, van der Bijl G. Sustainability of energy crops in Europe - a methodology developed and applied. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Centre for Agriculture and Environment (CLM); 1996.
3. Environmental European Agency. Application of the emissions trading directive by EU member states - reporting year 2008. EEA Technical Report No. 13/2008; 2008. ISSN: 1725-2237.
4. Korre A, Nie Z, Duruncan S. Life cycle modeling of fossil fuel power generation with post-combustion CO2 capture. Int J Greenh Gas Control 2010;4:289-90.
5. Odeh NA, Cockerill TT. Life cycle analysis of UK coal fired power plants. Energy Convers Manage 2008;49:212-20. (Pubitemid 350137556)
6. Patyk A, Reinhardt GA. Bioenergy for Europe: which ones fit best? A comparative analysis for the community. Contract CT 98 3832, Final Report; 2000.
7. Prochnow A, Heiermann M, Plöchl M, Amon T, Hobbs PJ. Bioenergy from permanent grassland - a review: 2. Combustion Bioresour Technol 2009;21:4945-54.
8. Richers U, Scheurer W, Seifert H, Hein KRG. Present status and perspectives of cocombustion in German power plants. Forschungszentrum Karlsruhem, Institute for Technical Chemistry; 2002. ISSN: 0947-8620.
9. Rourke FO, Boyle F, Reynolds A. Renewable energy resources and technologies applicable to Ireland. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2009;13:1975-84.
10. Spath PL, Mann MK, Kerr DR. Life cycle assessment of coal-fired power production. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Report NREL/TP-570-25119; 1999.
11. UNESCO. Renewable sources of energy with special emphasis on biomass: progress and policies, E/C.13/1996/CRP.1, Report of the Secretary-General; 1996.
12. Viebahn P, Nitsch J, Fischedick M, Esken A, Schüwer D, Supersberger N, et al. Comparison of carbon capture and storage energy technologies regarding structural, and ecological aspects in Germany, Int. Int J Greenh Gas Control 2007;1: 121-3.