Can a theory of voluntariness be a priori and value-free?

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 11, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 17-18

  Appelbaum, Paul S ^a  

^a NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960913903     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2011.583325     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Appelbaum, P. S., C.W. Lidz, and R. Klitzman. 2009. Voluntariness of consent to research: a conceptual model. Hastings Center Report 39(1): 30-39.
2. Berg, J. W., P. S. Appelbaum, C. W. Lidz, et al. 2001. Informed consent: Legal theory and clinical practice, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Dunn, L. B., M. A. Nowrangi, B. W. Palmer, et al. 2006. Assessing decisional capacity for clinical research or treatment: A review of instruments. American Journal of Psychiatry 163: 1323- 1334.
4. Fingarette, H. 1989. Heavy drinking:Themyth of alcoholism as a disease. Berkeley: University of California Press.
5. Kopelman, L. M. 1990. On the evaluative nature of competency and capacity judgments. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 13: 309-329.
6. Meisel, A., and L. H. Roth. 1981. What we do and do not know about informed consent. Journal of the American Medical Association 246:2473-2477.
7. Nelson, R. M., T. Beauchamp, V. A. Miller, W. Reynolds, R. F. Ittenbach, and M. F. Luce. 2011. The concept of voluntary consent. American Journal of Bioethics 11(8): 6-16.
8. Wertheimer, A. 1987. Coercion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.