Changes in auditory frequency guide visual-spatial attention

Cognition

Volumn 121, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 133-139

  Mossbridge, Julia A ^a   Grabowecky, Marcia ^a   Suzuki, Satoru ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory visual interactions; Cross modal perception; Implicit attentional processing; Multi modal cognition; Visual spatial attention

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY SYSTEM FUNCTION; COLOR VISION; FEMALE; FREQUENCY MODULATION; HEAD POSITION; HEARING; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; PITCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; SPATIAL FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION; WORKING MEMORY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79960911332     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: 18737838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.06.003     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ben-Artzi E., Marks L.E. Visual-auditory interaction in speeded classification: role of stimulus difference. Perception and Psychophysics 1995, 57(8):1151-1162.
2. Bernstein I.H., Edelstein B.A. Effects of some variations in auditory input upon visual choice reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1971, 87(2):241-247.
3. Bolognini N., Frassinetti F., Serino A., Ladavas E. " Acoustical vision" of below threshold stimuli: interaction among spatially converging audiovisual inputs. Experimental Brain Research 2005, 160(3):273-282.
4. Brainard D. The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision 1997, 10:433-446.
5. Deutsch D., Hamaoui K., Henthorn T. The glissando illusion and handedness. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45(13):2981-2988.
6. Driver J., Spence C. Attention and the crossmodal construction of space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1998, 2:254-262.
7. Eitan Z., Granot R.Y. HOW MUSIC MOVES: Musical parameters and listeners' images of motion. Music Perception 2006, 23(3):27p.
8. Evans K.K., Treisman A. Natural cross-modal mappings between visual and auditory features. Journal of Vision 2010, 10(1):1-12.
9. Frassinetti F., Bolognini N., Ladavas E. Enhancement of visual perception by crossmodal visuo-auditory interaction. Experimental Brain Research 2002, 147(3):332-343.
10. Iordanescu L., Grabowecky M., Franconeri S., Theeuwes J., Suzuki S. Characteristic sounds make you look at target objects more quickly. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics 2010, 72(7):1736-1741.
11. Iordanescu L., Guzman-Martinez E., Grabowecky M., Suzuki S. Characteristic sounds facilitate visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2008, 15(3):548-554.
12. Jain A., Sally S.L., Papathomas T.V. Audiovisual short-term influences and aftereffects in motion: examination across three sets of directional pairings. Journal of Vision 2008, 8(15):1-13. 7.
13. MacMillan N.A., Creelman C.D. Detection Theory: A User's Guide 2005, Laurence Erlbaum, New York.
14. Maeda F., Kanai R., Shimojo S. Changing pitch induced visual motion illusion. Current Biology 2004, 14(23):R990-R991.
15. Marks L.E. On cross-modal similarity: auditory-visual interactions in speeded discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1987, 13(3):384-394.
16. Melara R., O'Brien T. Interaction between synesthetically corresponding dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1987, 116:323-336.
17. Miller A., Wener H., Wapner S. Studies in physiognomic perception: V. Effect of ascending and descending gliding tones on autokinetic motion. Journal of Psychology 1958, 46:101-105.
18. Noble C., Mossbridge J., Iordanescu L., Sherman A., List A., Grabowecky M., et al. Motion induced pitch: A case of visual-auditory synesthesia. Journal of Vision 2010.
19. Patching G.R., Quinlan P.T. Garner and congruence effects in the speeded classification of bimodal signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2002, 28(4):755-775.
20. Pelli D. The videotoolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision 1997, 10:437-442.
21. Pratt C. The spatial character of high and low tones. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1930, 13:278-285.
22. Pratt J., Hommel B. Symbolic control of visual attention: The role of working memory and attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29:835-845.
23. Priebe N.J., Cassanello C.R., Lisberger S.G. The neural representation of speed in macaque area MT. Journal of Neuroscience 2003, 23(13):5650-5661.
24. Stein B., Meredith M., Huneycutt W., McDade L. Behavioral indices of multisensory integration: orientation to visual cues is affected by auditory stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 1989, 1(1):12-24.
25. Talsma D., Senkowski D., Soto-Faraco S., Woldorff M.G. The multifaceted interplay between attention and multisensory integration. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2010, 14:400-410.
26. Walker R. The effects of culture, environment, age, and musical training on choices of visual metaphors for sound. Perception and Psychophysics 1987, 42(5):491-502.
27. Widmann A., Gruber T., Kujala T., Tervaniemi M., Schroger E. Binding symbols and sounds: evidence from event-related oscillatory gamma-band activity. Cerebral Cortex 2007, 17(11):2696-2702.
28. Widmann A., Kujala T., Tervaniemi M., Kujala A., Schroger E. From symbols to sounds: visual symbolic information activates sound representations. Psychophysiology 2004, 41(5):709-715.