Sperm DNA damage evaluation techniques

Journal of Andrology

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 207-209

  Dugum, Mohannad ^a   Sandlow, Jay I ^b   Brannigan, Robert E ^c  

^a JORDAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Jordan)

^b MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMET ASSAY; DNA DAMAGE; DNA FRAGMENTATION; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; NICK END LABELING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMEN ANALYSIS; GENETICS; HUMAN; MALE;

DNA;

COMET ASSAY; DNA; DNA DAMAGE; HUMANS; IN SITU NICK-END LABELING; MALE;

EID: 79960908875     PISSN: 01963635     EISSN: 19394640     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2164/jandrol.110.011775     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Bungum M, Humaidan P, Spano M, Jepson K, Bungum L, Giwecman A. The predictive value of sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) parameters for the outcome of intrauterine insemination, IVF and ICSI. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:1401-1408.
2. Collins JA, Barnhart KT, Schlegel PN. Do sperm DNA integrity tests predict pregnancy with no vitro fertilization? Fertil Steril. 2008;89(4):823-831.
3. Duran EH, Morshedi M, Taylor S, Oehninger S. Sperm DNA quality predicts intrauterine insemination outcome: a prospective cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:3122-3128.
4. Evenson DP, Baer RK, Jost LK. Long-term effects of triethylenemelamine exposure on mouse testis cells and sperm chromatin structure assayed by flow of cytometry. Environ Mol Mutagen. 1989;14:79-89.
5. Evenson DP, Jost LK, Marshall D, Zimaman MJ, Clegg E, Purvis K, de Angelis P, Claussen OP. Utility of sperm chromatin structure assay as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in the human fertility clinic. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:1039-1049.
6. Fernandez JL, Muriel L, Rivero MT, Goyanes V, Vazquez R, Alvarez JG. The sperm chromatin dispersion test: a simple method for the determination of sperm DNA fragmentation. J Androl. 2003; 24:59-66.
7. Gorczyca W, Traganos F, Jesionowska H, Darzynkiewicz Z. Presence of DNA strand breaks and increased sensitivity of DNA in situ to denaturation in abnormal human sperm cells: analogy to apoptosis of somatic cells. Exp Cell Res. 1993;207:202-205.
8. Henkel R, Kierspel E, Hajimohammad M, Stalf T, Hoogendijk C, Mehnert C, Menkveld R, Schill WB, Kruger TF. DNA fragmentation of spermatozoa and assisted reproduction technology. Reprod BioMed Online. 2003;7:477-484.
9. Makhlouf AA, Niederberger C. DNA integrity tests in clinical practice: it is not a simple matter of black and white (or red and green). J Androl. 2006;27:316-323.
10. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM). The clinical utility of sperm DNA integrity testing. Fertil Steril. 2006;86(5 suppl 1):S35-S37.
11. Sailer BL, Jost LK, Evenson DP. Mammalian sperm DNA susceptibility to in situ denaturation associated with the presence of DNA strand breaks as measured by the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase assay. J Androl. 1995;16:80-87.
12. Spano M, Bonde J, Hjollund HI, Kolstantd HA, Cordelli E, Leter G. Sperm chromatin damage impairs human fertility. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:43-50.