Three-dimensional reconstruction using an adaptive simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique in electron tomography

Journal of Structural Biology

Volumn 175, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 277-287

  Wan, Xiaohua ^a,c   Zhang, Fa ^a   Chu, Qi ^a,c   Zhang, Kai ^b,c   Sun, Fei ^b   Yuan, Bo ^d   Liu, Zhiyong ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF COMPUTING TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b INSTITUTE OF BIOPHYSICS   (China)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^d SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

ASART (adaptive simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique); Electron tomography; Iterative methods; Three dimensional reconstruction

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE SIMULTANEOUS ALGEBRAIC RECONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUE; ARTICLE; ELECTRON TOMOGRAPHY; GEOMETRY; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NOISE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TILTING;

ALGORITHMS; ELECTRON MICROSCOPE TOMOGRAPHY; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 79960902127     PISSN: 10478477     EISSN: 10958657     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2011.06.002     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Andersen A.H., Kak A.C. Simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique (SART): a superior implementation of the ART algorithm. Ultrasonic Imag. 1984, 6:81-94.
2. Bilbao-Castro J.R., Carazo J.M., Fernandez J.J. Parallelization of reconstruction algorithms in three-dimensional electron microscopy. Appl. Math. Mod. 2006, 30:688-701.
3. Bilbao-Castro J.R., Marabini R., Sorzano C.O.S., Garcia I., Carazo J., Fernandez J.J. Exploiting desktop supercomputing for three-dimensional electron microscopy reconstructions using ART with blobs. J. Struct. Biol. 2009, 165:19-26.
4. Censor Y. Finite series-expansion reconstruction methods. Proc. IEEE 1983, 71(3):409-419.
5. Castano-Diez D., Mueller H., Frangakis A.S. Implementation and performance evaluation of reconstruction algorithms on graphics processors. J. Struct. Biol. 2007, 157:288-295.
6. Fernández J.J., Lawrence A.F., Roca J., García I., Ellisman M.H., Carazo J.M. High performance electron tomography of complex biological specimens. J. Struct. Biol. 2002, 138:6-20.
7. Electron tomography: Methods for Three-Dimensional Visualization of Structures in the Cell, second ed 2006, Springer, New York. J. Frank (Ed.).
8. Guan H., Gordon R. A projection access order for speedy convergence of ART (algebraic reconstruction technique): a multilevel scheme for computed tomography. Phys. Med. Biol. 1994, 39:2005-2022.
9. Guan H., Gordon R. Computed tomography using algebraic reconstruction techniques (ARTs) with different projection access schemes: a comparison study under practical situations. Phys. Med. Biol. 1996, 41:1727-1743.
10. Guan H., Gordon R., Zhu Y. Combining various projection access schemes with the algebraic reconstruction technique for low-contrast detection in computed tomography. Phys. Med. Biol. 1998, 43:2413-2421.
11. Guan H., Yin F., Zhu Y., Kim J.J. Adaptive portal CT reconstruction: a simulation study. Med. Phys. 2000, 27:2209-2214.
12. Herman G. Image Reconstruction from Projections: The Fundamentals of Computerized Tomography 1980, Academic Press, New York.
13. Herman G., Meyer L. Algebraic reconstruction can be made computationally efficient. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 1993, 12(3):600-609.
14. Huang X., Song X., Zhu P. Cryo electron tomography and its application to biological research. Acta Biophys. Sin. 2010, 26(7):570-578.
15. Jiang M., Wang G. Convergence studies on iterative algorithms for image reconstruction. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 2003, 22:569-575.
16. Kazantsev I., Matej S., Lewitt R.M. Optimal ordering of projections using permutation matrices and angles between projection subspaces. Electronic Notes Discrete Math. 2005, 20:205-216.
17. Lewitt R.M. Alternative to voxels for image representation in iterative reconstruction algorithms. Phys. Med. Biol. 1992, 37:705-716.
18. Marabini R., Rietzel E., Schroeder E., Herman G., Carazo J. Three-dimensional reconstruction from reduced sets of very noisy images acquired following a single-axis tilt schema: application of a new three-dimensional reconstruction algorithm and objective comparison with weighted back-projection. J. Struct. Biol. 1997, 120:363-371.
19. Marabini R., Herman G.T., Carazo J.M. 3D reconstruction in electron microscopy using ART with smooth spherically symmetric volume elements (blobs). Ultramicroscopy 1998, 72:53-65.
20. Matej S., Lewitt R.M. Efficient 3D grids for image-reconstruction using spherically-symmetrical volume elements. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 1995, 42:1361-1370.
21. Matej S., Lewitt R.M. Practical considerations for 3D image reconstruction using spherically symmetric volume elements. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 1996, 15:68-78.
22. Mueller K., Yagel R., Cornhill J.F. The weighted-distance scheme: a globally optimizing projection ordering method for ART. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 2002, 16(2):223-230.
23. Radermacher M. Weighted back-projection methods. Electron Tomogr. 2006, 245:273.
24. Shufeng S., Kai Z., Wei X., Gang W., Jianjun C., Fei S. 3D structural investigation of caveolae from porcine aorta endothelial cell by electron tomography. Prog. Biochem. Biophys. 2009, 36(6):729-735.
25. Sorzano C., Marabini R., Boisset N., Rietzel E., Schroder R., Herman G., Carazo J. The effect of overabundant projection directions on 3D reconstruction algorithms. J. Struct. Biol. 2001, 133(2-3):108-118.
26. Wenkai L. Adaptive algebraic reconstruction technique. Med. Phys. 2004, 31:3222-3230.
27. Xiaohua, W., Fa, Z., Zhiyong, L., 2009. Modified Simultaneous Algebraic Reconstruction Technique and its Parallelization in Cryo-electron Tomography. ICPADS', 2009.
28. Zhang K., Zhang Y., Hu Z., Gang J., Sun F. Development and Frontier of electron microscopy 3D reconstruction. Acta Biophys. Sin. 2010, 26(7):533-559.