Exacerbated attention orienting to auditory stimulation in migraine patients

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 122, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1755-1763

  Demarquay, Geneviève ^a   Caclin, Anne ^b,c   Brudon, Frédérique ^d,e   Fischer, Catherine ^b,c,d   Morlet, Dominique ^b,c  

^a CROIX ROUSSE HOSPITAL   (France)

^b LYON NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH CENTER   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^d HÔPITAL NEUROLOGIQUE   (France)

^e Tonkin Clinic   (France)

Author keywords

Attention orienting; Event Related Potentials; Habituation; Migraine; N1; P3a

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DISEASE EXACERBATION; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HABITUATION; HUMAN; MENSTRUAL CYCLE; MENSTRUATION; MIGRAINE; NEUROLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ATTENTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HABITUATION, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGIC; HUMANS; MENSTRUATION DISTURBANCES; MIGRAINE DISORDERS;

EID: 79960890394     PISSN: 13882457     EISSN: 18728952     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.02.013     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. The International Classification of Headache Disorders: 2nd edition. Cephalalgia 2004; 24 Suppl 1: 9-160.
2. Aguera PE, Jerbi K, Caclin A, Bertrand O. ELAN: A software package for analysis and visualization of MEG, EEG, and LFP signals. Comput Intell Neurosci 2011;in press.
3. Afra J., Cecchini A.P., De Pasqua V., Albert A., Schoenen J. Visual evoked potentials during long periods of pattern-reversal stimulation in migraine 1998, 121(Pt 2):233-241.
4. Alcaini M., Giard M.H., Thevenet M., Pernier J. Two separate frontal components in the N1 wave of the human auditory cortex. Psychophysiology 1994, 31:611-615.
5. Ambrosini A., De Pasqua V., Afra J., Sandor P.S., Schoenen J. Reduced gating of middle-latency auditory evoked potentials (P50) in migraine patients: another indication of abnormal sensory processing?. Neurosci Lett 2001, 306(1-2):132-134. Jun 22.
6. Ambrosini A., Rossi P., De Pasqua V., Pierelli F., Schoenen J. Lack of habituation causes high intensity dependence of auditory evoked cortical potentials in migraine. Brain 2003, 126(Pt 9):2009-2015.
7. Ambrosini A., Schoenen J. Electrophysiological response patterns of primary sensory cortices in migraine. J Headache Pain 2006, 7(6):377-388.
8. Birbaumer N., Elbert T., Canavan A.G., Rockstroh B. Slow potentials of the cerebral cortex and behavior. Physiol Rev 1990, 70(1):1-41.
9. Böcker K.B., Timsit-Berthier M., Schoenen J., Brunia C.H. Contingent Negative Variation in migraine. Headache 1990, 30(9):604-609.
10. Bourbon W.T., Will K.W., Gary H.E., Papanicolaou A.C. Habituation of auditory event-related potentials: a comparison of self - initiated and automated stimulus trains. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1987, 66(2):160-166.
11. Budd T.W., Barry R.J., Gordon E., Rennie C., Michie P.T. Decrement of the N1 auditory event-related potential with stimulus repetition: habituation vs. refractoriness. Int J Psychophysiol 1998, 31(1):51-68.
12. Clemens B., Bank J., Piros P., Bessenyei M., Veto S., Toth M., Kondakor I. Three-dimensional localization of abnormal EEG activity in migraine. A low resolution electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) study of migraine patients in the Pain-free Interval. Brain Topogr 2008, 21(1):36-42.
13. Coppola G., Pierelli F., Schoenen J. Habituation and migraine. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2009, 92(2):249-259.
14. Demarquay G., Royet J.P., Giraud P., Chazot G., Valade D., Ryvlin P. Rating of olfactory judgements in migraine patients. Cephalalgia 2006, 26(9):1123-1130.
15. Di Clemente L., Coppola G., Magis D., Fumal A., De Pasqua V., Schoenen J. Nociceptive Blink Reflex and Visual Evoked Potential Habituations Are Correlated in Migraine. Headache: J. Head Face Pain 2005, 45(10):1388-1393.
16. Drake M.E., Pakalnis A., Padamadan H. Long-latency auditory event related potentials in migraine. Headache 1989, 29:239-241.
17. Evers S., Quibeldey F., Grotemeyer K.H., Suhr B., Husstedt I.W. Dynamic changes of cognitive habituation and serotonin metabolism during the migraine interval. Cephalalgia 1999, 19(5):485-491.
18. Friedman D., Cycowicz Y.M., Gaeta H. The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2001, 25(4):355-373.
19. Gantenbein A.R., Sandor P.S. Physiological parameters as biomarkers of migraine. Headache 2006, 46(7):1069-1074.
20. Giffin N.J., Kaube H. The electrophysiology of migraine. Curr Opin Neurol 2002, 15(3):303-309.
21. Groves P.M., Thompson R.F. Habituation: a dual-process theory. Psychol Rev 1970, 77(5):419-450.
22. Judit A., Sandor P.S., Schoenen J. Habituation of visual and intensity dependence of auditory evoked cortical potentials tends to normalize just before and during the migraine attack. Cephalalgia 2000, 20(8):714-719.
23. Kropp P., Gerber W.D. Is increased amplitude of contingent negative variation in migraine due to cortical hyperactivity or to reduced habituation?. Cephalalgia 1993, 13(1):37-41.
24. Kropp P., Gerber W.D. Contingent negative variation during migraine attack and interval: evidence for normalization of slow cortical potentials during the attack. Cephalalgia 1995, 15(2):123-128. discussion 178-129.
25. Kropp P., Gerber W.D. Prediction of migraine attacks using a slow cortical potential, the contingent negative variation. Neurosci Lett 1998, 257(2):73-76.
26. Maertens de Noordhout A., Timsit-Berthier M., Timsit M., Schoenen J. Contingent negative variation in headache. Ann Neurol 1986, 19(1):78-80.
27. Main A., Dowson A., Gross M. Photophobia and phonophobia in migraineurs between attacks. Headache 1997, 37(8):492-495.
28. Mazzotta G., Alberti A., Santucci A., Gallai V. The event-related potential P300 during headache-free period and spontaneous attack in adult headache sufferers. Headache 1995, 35:210-215.
29. Mulder E.J., Linssen W.H., de Geus E.I. Reduced sensory anticipation in migraine. Psychophysiology 2002, 39(2):166-174.
30. Mulder E.J., Linssen W.H., Passchier J., Orlebeke J.F., de Geus E.J. Interictal and postictal cognitive changes in migraine. Cephalalgia 1999, 19(6):557-565. discussion 541.
31. Mulleners W.M., Aurora S.K., Chronicle E.P., Stewart R., Gopal S., Koehler P.J. Self-reported photophobic symptoms in migraineurs and controls are reliable and predict diagnostic category accurately. Headache 2001, 41(1):31-39.
32. Näätänen R., Picton T. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 1987, 24(4):375-425.
33. Oelkers R., Grosser K., Lang E., Geisslinger G., Kobal G., Brune K., Lotsch J. Visual evoked potentials in migraine patients: alterations depend on pattern spatial frequency. Brain 1999, 122(Pt 6):1147-1155.
34. Polich J. An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin Neurophysiol 2007, 118(10):2128-2148.
35. Ritter W., Vaughan H.G., Costa L.D. Orienting and habituation to auditory stimuli: a study of short term changes in average evoked responses. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1968, 25:550-556.
36. Sand T., Vingen J.V. Visual, long-latency auditory and brainstem auditory evoked potentials in migraine: relation to pattern size, stimulus intensity, sound and light discomfort thresholds and pre-attack state. Cephalalgia 2000, 20(9):804-820.
37. Sand T., Zhitniy N., White L.R., Stovner L.J. Visual evoked potential latency, amplitude and habituation in migraine. Clin Neurophysiol 2008, 119(5):1020-1027.
38. Schmitz N., Arkink E.B., Mulder M., Rubia K., Admiraal-Behloul F., Schoonmann G.G., Kruit M.C., Ferrari M.D., van Buchem M.A. Frontal lobe structure and executive function in migraine patients. Neurosci Lett 2008, 440(2):92-96.
39. Schoenen J., Ambrosini A., Sandor P.S., Maertens de Noordhout A. Evoked potentials and transcranial magnetic stimulation in migraine: published data and viewpoint on their pathophysiologic significance. Clin Neurophysiol 2003, 114(6):955-972.
40. Schoenen J., Wang W., Albert A., Delwaide P.J. Potentiation instead of habituation characterizes visual evoked potentials in migraine patients between attacks. Eur J Neurol 1995, 2:115-122.
41. Siniatchkin M., Gerber W.D., Kropp P., Voznesenskaya T., Vein A.M. Are the periodic changes of neurophysiological parameters during the pain-free interval in migraine related to abnormal orienting activity?. Cephalalgia 2000, 20(1):20-29.
42. Siniatchkin M., Kirsch E., Kropp P., Stephani U., Gerber W.D. Slow cortical potentials in migraine families. Cephalalgia 2000, 20(10):881-892.
43. Siniatchkin M., Kropp P., Gerber W.D. Contingent negative variation in subjects at risk for migraine without aura. Pain 2001, 94(2):159-167.
44. Siniatchkin M., Kropp P., Gerber W.D. What kind of habituation is impaired in migraine patients?. Cephalalgia 2003, 23(7):511-518.
45. Siniatchkin M., Kropp P., Neumann M., Gerber W., Stephani U. Intensity dependence of auditory evoked cortical potentials in migraine families. Pain 2000, 85(1-2):247-254.
46. Snyder E., Hillyard S.A. Long-latency evoked potentials to irrelevant, deviant stimuli. Behav Biol 1976, 16(3):319-331.
47. Sokolov E.N. Higher nervous functions; the orienting reflex. Annu Rev Physiol 1963, 25:545-580.
48. Vanagaite J., Pareja J.A., Storen O., White L.R., Sand T., Stovner L.J. Light-induced discomfort and pain in migraine. Cephalalgia 1997, 17(7):733-741.
49. Vingen J.V., Sand T., Stovner L.J. Sensitivity to various stimuli in primary headaches: a questionnaire study. Headache 1999, 39(8):552-558.
50. Walpurger V., Pietrowsky R., Kirschbaum C., Wolf O.T. Effects of the menstrual cycle on auditory event-related potentials. Horm Behav 2004, 46(5):600-606.
51. Walter W.G., Cooper R., Aldridge V.J., McCallum W.C., Winter A.L. Contingent Negative Variation: an Electric Sign of Sensorimotor Association and Expectancy in the Human Brain. Nature 1964, 203:0-384.
52. Wang W., Schoenen J. Interictal potentiation of passive "oddball" auditory event-related potentials in migraine. Cephalalgia 1998, 18(5):261-265.
53. Wang W., Schoenen J., Timsit-Berthier M. Cognitive functions in migraine without aura between attacks: a psychophysiological approach using the "oddball" paradigm. Neurophysiol Clin 1995, 25(1):3-11.
54. Wang W., Timsit-Berthier M., Schoenen J. Intensity dependence of auditory evoked potentials is pronounced in migraine: an indication of cortical potentiation and low serotonergic neurotransmission?. Neurology 1996, 46(5):1404-1409.
55. Wang W., Wang G.P., Ding X.L., Wang Y.H. Personality and response to repeated visual stimulation in migraine and tension-type headaches. Cephalalgia 1999, 19(8):718-724. discussion 697-718.
56. Woods D.L., Elmasian E. The habituation of event-related potentials to speech sounds and tones. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1986, 65:446-459.