Maintaining source privacy under eavesdropping and node compromise attacks

Proceedings - IEEE INFOCOM

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 1656-1664

  Pongaliur, Kanthakumar ^a   Xiao, Li ^a  

^a Michigan State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVERSARY MODELS; CRYPTOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUES; DETECTING SENSORS; DIFFERENT ATTACKS; EN-ROUTE; EVENT LOCATION; ITS EFFICIENCIES; MALICIOUS ENTITY; NODE COMPROMISE; RANDOM WALK; SOURCE NODES; TRACEBACK; TRAFFIC ANALYSIS;

CRYPTOGRAPHY; SENSOR NETWORKS; SENSORS; TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT;

SENSOR NODES;

EID: 79960880538     PISSN: 0743166X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/INFCOM.2011.5934959     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Y.-C. Hu, M. Jakobsson, and A. Perrig. Efficient constructions for oneway hash chains. In Applied Cryptography and Network Security, pages 423-441, 2005.
2. P. Kamat, Y. Zhang, W. Trappe, and C. Ozturk. Enhancing sourcelocation privacy in sensor network routing. In Proceedings of the 25th IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, Washington DC, 2005.
3. C. Karlof, N. Sastry, and D. Wagner. Tinysec: a link layer security architecture for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, pages 162-175, New York, USA, 2004. ACM.
4. K. Mehta, D. Liu, and M. Wright. Location privacy in sensor networks against a global eavesdropper. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP 2007), Oct. 2007.
5. A. A. Nezhad, A. Miri, and D. Makrakis. Location privacy and anonymity preserving routing for wireless sensor networks. Computer Networks, 52(18):3433-3452, 2008.
6. Y. Ouyang, Z. Le, D. Liu, J. Ford, and F. Makedon. Source location privacy against laptop-class attacks in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Security and privacy in communication netowrks, pages 1-10, New York, USA, 2008. ACM.
7. A.-S. K. Pathan and C. S. Hong. Serp: secure energy-efficient routing protocol for densely deployed wireless sensor networks. Annales des Téĺecommunications, 63(9-10):529-541, 2008.
8. J. peter Kaps and B. Sunar. Energy comparison of aes and sha-1 for ubiquitous computing. In IFIP International Conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing (EUC 2006), LNCS. Springer, 2006.
9. G. J. Pottie and W. J. Kaiser. Wireless integrated network sensors. Communications of ACM, 43(5):51-58, 2000.
10. T. Roosta, S. Shieh, and S. Sastry. Taxonomy of security attacks in sensor networks and countermeasures. In The First IEEE International Conference on System Integration and Reliability Improvements, Hanoi, Vietnam, December 2006.
11. M. Shao, Y. Yang, S. Zhu, and G. Cao. Towards statistically strong source anonymity for sensor networks. In INFOCOM 2008, The 27th Conference on Computer Communications, pages 51-55, April 2008.
12. H. Wang, B. Sheng, and Q. Li. Privacy-aware routing in sensor networks. Computer Networks, 53(9):1512-1529, 2009.
13. R. Watro, D. Kong, S.-f. Cuti, C. Gardiner, C. Lynn, and P. Kruus. Tinypk: securing sensor networks with public key technology. In SASN '04: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM workshop on Security of ad hoc and sensor networks, pages 59-64, New York, USA, 2004. ACM.
14. B. Xiao, B. Yu, and C. Gao. Chemas: Identify suspect nodes in selective forwarding attacks. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 67(11):1218-1230, 2007.
15. Y. Yang, M. Shao, S. Zhu, B. Urgaonkar, and G. Cao. Towards event source unobservability with minimum network traffic in sensor networks. In WiSec '08: Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Wireless network security, pages 77-88, New York, NY, USA, 2008.