When species matches are unavailable are DNA barcodes correctly assigned to higher taxa? An assessment using sphingid moths

BMC Ecology

Volumn 11, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Wilson, John J ^a   Rougerie, Rodolphe ^a,e   Schonfeld, Justin ^a   Janzen, Daniel H ^b   Hallwachs, Winnie ^b   Hajibabaei, Mehrdad ^a   Kitching, Ian J ^c   Haxaire, Jean ^d   Hebert, Paul D N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

^d MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

^e UNIVERSITÉ DE ROUEN   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; ASSESSMENT METHOD; DNA; MOTH; SPECIES INVENTORY; SPECIES OCCURRENCE; TAXONOMY;

LEPIDOPTERA; SPHINGIDAE;

DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; DNA BARCODING; EVALUATION; GENE LIBRARY; GENETICS; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR GENETICS; MOTH; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY;

ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; DNA; DNA BARCODING, TAXONOMIC; GENE LIBRARY; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MOTHS; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 79960862758     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726785     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6785-11-18     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Waugh J. DNA barcoding in animal species: progress, potential and pitfalls. BioEssays 2007, 29:188-197.
2. Floyd R, Wilson JJ, Hebert PDN. DNA barcodes and insect biodiversity. Insect Biodiversity: Science and Society 2009, 417-431. Oxford, Blackwell Publishing, Foottit RG, Adler PH.
3. Ratnasingham S, Hebert PDN. BOLD: The Barcode of Life Data System http://www.dnabarcoding.org. Mol Ecol Notes 2007, 7:355-364.
4. Ball SL, Armstrong KF. DNA barcodes for insect pest identification: a test case with tussock moths (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Can J For Res 2006, 36:337-350.
5. Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 2003, 270:313-321.
6. Kerr KCR, Lijtmaer DA, Barreira AS, Hebert PDN, Tubaro PL. Probing evolutionary patterns in Neotropical birds through DNA barcodes. PLoS ONE 2009, 4(2):e4379.
7. Handfield D, Handfield L. A new species of Plusia (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) from North America. Canadian Entomologist 2006, 138:853-859.
8. Armstrong KF, Ball SL. DNA barcodes for biosecurity: Invasive species identification. Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond B 2005, 360:1813-1823.
9. Ekrem T, Willassen E, Stur E. A comprehensive DNA sequence library is essential for identification with DNA barcodes. Mol Phyl Evol 2007, 43:530-542.
10. Rach J, DeSalle R, Sarkar IN, Schierwater B, Hadrys H. Character-based DNA barcoding allows discrimination of genera, species and populations in Odonata. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 2008, 275:237-247.
11. Whitworth TL, Dawson RD, Magalon H, Baudry E. DNA barcoding cannot reliably identify species of the blowfly genus Protocalliphora (Diptera: Calliphoridae). Proc Roy Soc Lond B 2007, 274:1731-1739.
12. Hebert PDN, Ratnasingham S, deWaard JR. Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 2003, 270:S96-S99.
13. Harris P. Food-plant groups of Semanophorinae (Lepidoptera-Sphingidae): A possible taxonomic tool. Canadian Entomologist 1972, 104:71-80.
14. Wilson JJ. Assessing the value of DNA barcodes and other priority gene regions for molecular phylogenetics of Lepidoptera. PLoS ONE 2010, 5(5):e10525.
15. Lepidoptera barcode of Life: Sphingidae. , http://www.lepbarcoding.org/sphingidae/index.php
16. Kitching IJ, Cadiou J-M. Hawkmoths of the world: annotated and illustrated revisionary checklist 2000, Ithaca, Cornell University Press.
17. Kawahara AY, Mignault AA, Regier JC, Kitching IJ, Mitter C. Phylogeny and biogeography of hawkmoths (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae): evidence from five nuclear genes. PLoS ONE 2009, 4(5):e5719.
18. Clare EL, Fraser EE, Braid HE, Fenton MB, Hebert PDN. Species on the menu of a generalist predator, the eastern red bat (Lasiurus borealis): using a molecular approach to detect arthropod prey. Mol Ecol 2009, 18:2532-2542.
19. Cohen NJ, Deeds JR, Wong ES, Hanner RH, Yancy HF, et al. Public health response to puffer fish (tetrodotoxin) poisoning from mislabeled product. J Food Protection 2009, 72:810-817.
20. Jurado-Rivera JA, Vogler AP, Reid CAM, Petitpierre E, Gomez-Zurita J. DNA barcoding insect-host plant associations. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 2009, 276:639-648.
21. Levkanicova Z, Bocak L. Identification of net-winged beetle larvae (Coleoptera: Lycidae) using three mtDNA fragments: a comparison of their utility. Syst Entomol 2009, 34:210-221.
22. Pons J. DNA-based identification of preys from non-destructive, total DNA extractions of predators using arthropod universal primers. Mol Ecol Notes 6:623-626.
23. DeSalle R, Egan MG, Siddall M. The unholy trinity: taxonomy, species delimitation and DNA barcoding. Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond B 2005, 36:1905-1916.
24. Elias M, Hill RI, Willmott KR, Dasmahapatra KK, Brower AVZ, et al. Limited performance of DNA barcoding in diverse community of tropical butterflies. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 2007, 274:2881-2889.
25. Meier R, Shiyany K, Vaidya G, Ng PKL. DNA barcoding and taxonomy in Diptera: a tale of high intraspecific variability and low identification success. Syst Biol 2006, 55:715-728.
26. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987, 4:406-25.
27. Sayers EW, Barrett T, Benson DA, Bolton E, Bryant SH, et al. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nuc Acids Res 2009, 38:D5-D16.
28. Sarkar IN, Planet PJ, DeSalle R. CAOS software for use in character-based DNA barcoding. Mol Ecol Res 2008, 8:1256-1259.
29. Little DP, Stevenson DW. A comparison of algorithms for the identification of specimens using DNA barcodes: examples from gymnosperms. Cladistics 2007, 23:1-27.
30. Wiens JJ, Servedio MR. Species delimitation in systematics: inferring diagnostic differences between species. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 2000, 267:631-636.
31. Wong E, Shivji MS, Hanner RH. Identifying sharks with DNA barcodes: assessing the utility of a nucleotide diagnostic approach. Mol Ecol Res 2009, 9(Suppl 1):243-256.
32. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980, 16:111-120.
33. Kelly RP, Sarkar IN, Eernisse DJ, Desalle R. DNA barcoding using chitons (genus Mopalia). Mol Ecol Notes 2007, 7:177-183.
34. Ball SL, Hebert PDN, Burian SK, Webb JM. Biological identifications of mayflies (Ephemeroptera) using DNA barcodes. J Nor Amer Benth Soc 2005, 24:508-524.
35. Regier JC, Cook CP, Mitter C, Hussey A. A phylogenetic study of the 'bombycoid complex' (Lepidoptera) using five protein-coding nuclear genes, with comments on the problem of macrolepidopteran phylogeny. Syst Entomol 2008, 33:175-189.
36. Ivanova NV, DeWaard JR, Hebert PDN. An inexpensive, automation-friendly protocol for recovering high-quality DNA. Mol Ecol Notes 2006, 6:998-1002.
37. Hajibabaei M, Janzen DH, Burns JM, Hallwachs W, Hebert PDN. DNA barcodes distinguish species of tropical Lepidoptera. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2006, 103:968-971.
38. Janzen DH, Hajibabaei M, Burns JM, Hallwachs W, Remigio E, Hebert PDN. Wedding biodiversity inventory of a large and complex Lepidoptera fauna with DNA barcoding. Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond B 2005, 360:1835-1845.
39. Janzen D, Hallwachs W, Blandin P, Burns JM, Cadiou J-M, et al. Integration of DNA barcoding into an ongoing inventory of complex tropical biodiversity. Mol Ecol Res 2009, 9:1-25.
40. Ross HA, Murugan S, Li WLS. Testing the reliability of genetic methods of species identification via simulation. Syst Biol 2008, 57:216-230.
41. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, et al. Clustal W and Clustal × version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:2947-2948.
42. Regier JC, Mitter C, Friedlander TP, Peigler RS. Phylogenetic relationships and evolution of hostplant use in Sphingidae (Lepidoptera): initial evidence from two nuclear genes. Mol Phyl Evol 2001, 20:311-316.
43. Rubinoff D, Cameron S, Will K. A genomic perspective on the shortcomings of mitochondrial DNA for "barcoding" identification. Journal of Heredity 2006, 97(6):581-594.
44. Meyer CP, Paulay G. DNA barcoding: error rates based on comprehensive sampling. PloS Biology 2005, 3:e422.
45. Vogler AP. Will DNA barcoding advance efforts to conserve biodiversity more efficiently than traditional taxonomic methods?. Front Ecol Environ 2006, 4:270-272.
46. Hennig W. Phylogenetic Systematics 1966, Urbana, University of Illinois Press.
47. Nazari V, Zakharov EV, Sperling FAH. Phylogeny, historical biogeography, and taxonomic ranking of Parnassiinae (Lepidoptera, Papilionidae) based on morphology and seven genes. Mol Phyl Evol 2007, 42:131-156.
48. Avise JC, Johns GC. Proposal for a standardized temporal scheme of biological classification for extant species. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 1999, 96:7358-7363.
49. Kitching IJ. The phylogenetic relationships of Morgan's Sphinx, Xanthopan morganii (Walker), the tribe Acherontiini, and allied long-tongued hawkmoths (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae, Sphinginae). Zoo J Lin Soc 2002, 135:471-527.
50. Rothschild LW, Jordan K. A revision of the lepidopterous family Sphingidae. Novitates Zoologicae 1903, 9(suppl):1-972.
51. Hundsdoerfer AK, Kitching IJ, Wink M. A molecular phylogeny of the hawkmoth genus Hyles (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae, Macroglossinae). Mol Phyl Evol 2005, 35:442-458.