Enterprising or altruistic selves? Making up research subjects in genetics research

Sociology of Health and Illness

Volumn 33, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 1081-1095

  Tutton, Richard ^a   Prainsack, Barbara ^b  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Biobanking; Internet; Personal genomics; Research participation; Subjectivity

Indexed keywords

ALTRUISM; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DECISION MAKING; ETHICS; GENETIC MARKER; GENETICS; HUMAN; INTERNET; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METAGENOMICS; MOTIVATION; PATIENT SELECTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; RESEARCH ETHICS; UNITED KINGDOM;

ALTRUISM; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; DECISION MAKING; ETHICS, RESEARCH; GENETIC MARKERS; GENETIC RESEARCH; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTERNET; METAGENOMICS; MOTIVATION; PATIENT SELECTION; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 79960846188     PISSN: 01419889     EISSN: 14679566     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01348.x     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. 23andMe (2010) '23andMe and a New Paradigm for Research', blog entry, 22 June 2010, available at:
2. 23andMe. (2009) The 23andMe Research Revolution. Available at: (accessed 1 December 2009).
3. Advocat, J. and Lindsay, J. (2010) Internet-based trials and the creation of health consumers. Social Science and Medicine, 70, 485-92.
4. Allison, M. (2009) Can web 2.0 reboot clinical trials? National Biotech, 27, 895-902.
5. Anon. (2007) UK Biobank: Report and Financial Statements for the Year ended 30 September 2007, Manchester.
6. Anon. (2009a) 23andMe completes $27.8 funding. Silicon Valley/San Jose Business Journal (25 December). Available at (accessed 15 March 2010).
7. Anon. (2009b) UK Biobank: Information Leaflet. Manchester: UK Biobank Ltd.
8. Anon. (2009c) Anne Wojcicki. Available at (accessed 22 March 2010).
9. Anon. (2009d) UK Biobank: Protocol for a large-scale prospective epidemiological resource. Manchester: UK Biobank.
10. Arvidsson, A. (2008) The ethical economy of customer coproduction, Journal of Macromarketing, 28, 4, 326-38.
11. Avey, L. (2009) Introducing a do-it-yourself revolution in disease research. Spittoon (7 July). Available at: (accessed 1 December 2009).
12. Barata, P.C., Gucciardi, E., Ahmad, F. and Stewart, D.E. (2006) Cross-cultural perspectives on research participation and informed consent, Social Science and Medicine, 62, 479-90.
13. Basch, E. (2010) The missing voice of patients in drug-safety reporting, New England Journal of Medicine, 362, 10, 865-9.
14. Bovenberg, J., Meulenkamp, T., Smets, E. and Gevers, S. (2009) Always expect the unexpected: legal and social aspects of reporting biobank research results to individual research participants. Centre for Society and Genomics, Nijmegen, NL (November). Available at: (accessed 15 May 2010).
15. Busby, H. (2006) Biobanks, bioethics and concepts of donated blood, Sociology of Health and Illness, 28, 850-65.
16. Callon, M. and Rabeharisoa, V. (2008) The growing engagement of emergent concerned groups in political and economic life: lessons from the French Association of Neuromuscular Disease Patients, Science Technology Human Values, 33, 230-61.
17. Cameron, L.D., Reeve, J., Readings, A. and Winship, I. (2002) Attitudes about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: a survey of general practitioners, medical students, and women in the northern region of New Zealand, New Zealand Family Physician, 29, 234-39.
18. Corrigan, O. (2003) Empty ethics: the problem with informed consent, Sociology of Health and Illness, 25, 768-92.
19. Corrigan, O. (2004) Informed consent: the contradictory ethical safeguards in pharmacogenetics. In Tutton, R. and Corrigan, O. (eds) Genetic Databases: Socio-ethical Issues in the Collection and Use of DNA. London: Routledge.
20. Corrigan, O. and Tutton, R. (2006) What's in a name? Subjects, volunteers, participants and activists in clinical research, Clinical Ethics, 1, 101-04.
21. Cox, S.M. and McKellin, W. (1999) 'There's this thing in our family': predictive testing and the construction of risk for Huntington Disease, Sociology of Health and Illness, 21, 622-46.
22. Cragg Ross Dawson (2000) Public Perceptions of the Collection of Human Biological Samples. London: Wellcome Trust and Medical Research Council.
23. Davison, C., Macintyre, S. and Smith, G.D. (1994) The potential social impact of predictive genetic testing for susceptibility to common chronic diseases: a review and proposed research agenda, Sociology of Health and Illness, 16, 340-71.
24. Dixon-Woods, M., Ashcroft, R.E., Jackson, C.J., Tobin, M.D., Kivits, J., Burton, P.R., et al. (2007) Beyond 'misunderstanding': written information and decisions about taking part in a genetic epidemiology study, Social Science and Medicine, 65, 2212-22.
25. Dolan, B. (2009) TEDMED: 23andMe has 30, 000 'active' genomes, launching 'Relative Finder' soon. (28 October). Available at (accessed 3 December 2009).
26. Epstein, S. (2007) Inclusion: the Politics of Difference in Medical Research. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
27. Eriksson, N., Macpherson, J., Tung, T., Hon, L., Naughton, B., Saxonov, S., et al. (2009) Web-based, participant-driven studies yield novel genetic associations for common traits, Annual Meeting of the American Society of Human Genetics, Hawaii.
28. Gibbon, S. (2007) Breast Cancer Genes and the Gendering of Knowledge: Science and Citizenship in the Cultural Context of the 'new' Genetics. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
29. Gibson, G. and Copenhaver, G.P. (2010) Consent and Internet-Enabled Human Genomics, PLoS Genet, 6, e1000965.
30. Giddens, A. (1992) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. London: Polity Press.
31. Giovanni, M.S., Fickie, M.R., Lehmann, L.S., Green, R.C., Meckley, L.M., Veenstra, D. and Murray, M.F. (2010) Health-care Referrals from Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing. Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers [e-publication ahead of print, 28 October].
32. Hacking, I (1999) Making up people. In Biagioli, M (ed.) The Science Studies Reader. London: Routledge.
33. Haddow, G., Laurie, G., Cunningham-Burley, S. and Hunter, K.G. (2007) Tackling community concerns about commercialisation and genetic research: a modest interdisciplinary proposal, Social Science and Medicine, 64, 272-82.
34. Haimes, E. and Whong-Barr, M. (2004) Levels and styles of participation in genetic databases: a case study of the North Cumbria Community Genetics Project. In Tutton, R. and Corrigan, O. (eds) Genetic Databases: Socio-ethical Issues in the Collection and Use of DNA. London: Routledge.
35. Hardey, M. (1999) Doctor in the house: the Internet as a source of lay health knowledge and the challenge to expertise, Sociology of Health and Illness, 21, 820-35.
36. Hoeyer, K. (2002) Conflicting notions of personhood in genetic research, Anthropology Today, 18, 9-13.
37. Hoeyer, K. (2004) Ambiguous gifts: public anxiety, informed consent and biobanks. In Tutton, R. and Corrigan, O. (eds) Genetic Databases: Socio-ethical Issues in the Collection and Use of DNA. London: Routledge.
38. Howards, H. and Borry, P. (2009) Personal genome testing: do you know what you are buying? American Journal of Bioethics, 9, 11-13.
39. Hyysalo, S. (2006) Representations of use and practice-bound imaginaries in automating the safety of the elderly, Social Studies of Science, 36, 599-626.
40. Kaufman, D., Murphy Bollinger, J., Devaney, S., Scott, J. Direct from consumers (2010) A survey of 1, 048 customers of three direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing companies about motivations, attitudes, and responses to testing. Presented at the American Society of Human Genetics conference in Washington, DC (5 November). Available at (accessed 7 November 2010).
41. Kincaid, J. (2009) 23AndMe Completes $27.8 Million Series B Round. TechCrunch (23 December). Available at: (accessed 15 March 2010).
42. Kivits, J. (2009) Everyday health and the internet: a mediated health perspective on health information seeking, Sociology of Health and Illness, 31, 673-87.
43. Klein, J. (2010) 23andMe lands $22M to expand personal genetics research. (10 November). Available (accessed 17 November 2010).
44. MacArthur, D. 2008. Cheap personal genomics: the death-knell for the industry? (10 September). Available at: (accessed 1 December 2009).
45. McCarty, C.A. 2009: To share or not to share: that is the question, Genomics Law Report. Available at (accessed 15 November 2009).
46. McGowan, M., Fishman, J.R. and Lambrix, M.A. (2010) Personal genomics and individual identities: motivations and moral imperatives of early adopters, New Genetics and Society, 29 3, 261-90.
47. Mitchell, R. and Waldby, C. (2010) National Biobanks: clinical labor, risk production, and the creation of biovalue, Science Technology Human Values, 35, 330-55.
48. Morris, N. and Bàlmer, B. (2006) Volunteer human subjects' understandings of their participation in a biomedical research experiment, Social Science and Medicine, 62, 998-1008.
49. Morris, N., Hebden, J.C., Bland, T. and Balmer, B. (2003) Role of patient feedback in the design and implementation of clinical trials of optical tomography of the breast. In Boas, D.A. (ed.) Photon Migration and Diffuse-Light Imaging: Proceedings of SPIE Volume 5138, Oct 2003.
50. Nettleton, S., Burrows, R. and O'Malley, L. (2005) The mundane realities of the everyday lay use of the internet for health, and their consequences for media convergence, Sociology of Health and Illness, 27, 972-92.
51. Ng, P.C., Murray S.S., Levy S. and Venter J.C. (2009). An agenda for personalised medicine. Nature 461: 724-26.
52. Novas, C. (2006) The political economy of hope: patients' organizations, science and biovalue, BioSocieties, 1, 289-305.
53. People Science and Policy (2002) BioBank UK: a Question of Trust: a Consultation Exploring and Addressing Questions of Public Trust London: Medical Research Council and Wellcome Trust.
54. Petersen, A. (1996) Risk and the regulated self: the discourse of health promotion as politics of uncertainty, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 31, 1, 44-57.
55. Petersen, A. (2006) Securing our genetic health: engendering trust in UK Biobank, Sociology of Health and Illness, 27, 271-92.
56. Petersen, A. and Bunton, R. (2002) The New Genetics and the Public's Health. London: Routledge.
57. Petersen, A. and Lupton, D. (1996) The New Public Health: Health and Self in the Age of Risk. London: Sage.
58. Prainsack, B. (2011) Labouring towards self-fulfilment: personal genomics and the 'participatory turn' Critical Public Health (in press).
59. Prainsack, B., Reardon, J., Hindmarsh, R., Gottweis, H., Naue, U. and Lunshof, J.E. (2008) Personal genomes: misdirected precaution, Nature, 456, 34-5.
60. Prainsack, B. and Wolinsky, H. (2010) Direct-to-consumer genome testing: opportunities for pharmacogenomics research? Pharmacogenomics 11, 5, 651-5.
61. Rose, N. and Novas, C. (2005) Biological Citizenship. In Ong, A. and Collier, S. (eds) Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems. Oxford: Blackwell.
62. Shaw, C., Abrams, K. and Marteau, T.M. (1999) Psychological impact of predicting individuals' risks of illness: a systematic review, Social Science and Medicine, 49, 1571-98.
63. Sillence, E., Briggs, P., Harris, P.R. and Fishwick, L. (2007) How do patients evaluate and make use of online health information? Social Science and Medicine, 64, 1853-62.
64. Sloane, Julie (2007) Top 10 startups worth watching in 2008. Wired (24 December). Available at: (accessed 15 March 2010).
65. Sprosen, T. (n.d.) 'UK Biobank: improving the health of future generations'. Presentation hosted at: (accessed 3 June 2010)
66. Stockdale, A. and Terry, S.F. (2002) Advocacy groups and the new genetics. In Alpher, J.S., Ard, C., Asch, A., Beckwith, J., Conrad, P. and Geller, L.N. (eds) The Double-Edged Helix: Social Implications of Genetics in a Diverse Society. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
67. Tutton, R. (2002) Gift relationships in genetic research, Science as Culture, 11, 523-42.
68. Tutton, R. (2004) Persons, property and gift: exploring languages of tissue donation to biomedical research. In Tutton, R. and Corrigan, O. (eds) Genetic Databases: Socio-ethical Issues in the Collection and Use of DNA. London: Routledge.
69. Tutton, R. and Corrigan, O. (2004) Genetic Databases: Socio-Ethical Issues in the Collection and Use of DNA. London: Routledge.
70. Vorhaus, D. (2009) Is there an obligation to return genetic data to research participants? Kaiser responds to 23andMe's TEDMED Criticism. (3 November). Genomics Law Report. Available at: (accessed 3 June 2010).
71. Vorhaus, D. (2010) A thanksgiving tradition: 23andMe repackages product, raises prices. (23 November). Genomics Law Report. Available at: (accessed 28 November 2010).
72. Waldby, C. and Mitchell, R. (2006) Tissue Economies: Blood, Organs, and Cell Lines in Late Capitalism. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
73. Wallace, H. (2005) The development of UK Biobank: excluding scientific controversy from ethical debate, Critical Public Health, 15, 323-33.
74. Watts, G. (2007) UK Biobank gets 10% response rate as it starts recruiting volunteers in Manchester, British Medical Journal, 334, 659.
75. Weiner, K. (2009) Lay involvement and legitimacy, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 38, 254-73.
76. Wilson, S. (2004) Population biobanks and social justice: commercial or communitarian models? Trames, 8, 80-9.
77. Winickoff, D.E. (2007) Partnership in U.K. biobank: a third way for genomic property, Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 35, 440-5.
78. Wojcicki, Anne (2009) Research participants have a right to their own genetic data. Spittoon (4 November). Available at (accessed 6 April 2010).