The benefits of discussing adjuvant therapies one at a time instead of all at once

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Volumn 129, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 79-87

  Zikmund Fisher, Brian J ^a,b   Angott, Andrea M ^c   Ubel, Peter A ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b Center for Behavioral and Decision Sciences in Medicine   (United States)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adjuvant therapies; Patient education as topic; Patient provider communication; Risk

Indexed keywords

ESTROGEN RECEPTOR;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER ADJUVANT THERAPY; CANCER HORMONE THERAPY; CANCER PATIENT; COMPREHENSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERNET; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PATIENT EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK REDUCTION;

ADULT; AGED; ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENTS, HORMONAL; ANTINEOPLASTIC COMBINED CHEMOTHERAPY PROTOCOLS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CHEMOTHERAPY, ADJUVANT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; RISK FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79960844419     PISSN: 01676806     EISSN: 15737217     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-010-1193-4     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. AM O'Connor D Stacey SD Entwistle H Llewellyn-Thomas D Rovner M Holmes-Rovner V Tait J Tetroe V Fiset M Barry J Jones 2003 Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2 CD001431 12804407
2. PB Peele LA Siminoff Y Xu PM Ravdin 2005 Decreased use of adjuvant breast cancer therapy in a randomized controlled trial of a decision aid with individualized risk information Med Decis Making 25 301 307 15951457 10.1177/0272989X05276851 (Pubitemid 40696279)
3. LA Siminoff NH Gordon P Silverman T Budd PM Ravdin 2006 A decision aid to assist in adjuvant therapy choices for breast cancer Psychooncology 15 1001 1003 16511899 10.1002/pon.1040 (Pubitemid 44762705)
4. J Belkora HS Rugo DH Moore D Hutton L Esserman 2008 Risk communication with patients with breast cancer: cautionary notes about printing adjuvant! estimates Lancet Oncol 9 602 603 18598923 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70158-X (Pubitemid 351878045)
5. BJ Zikmund-Fisher A Fagerlin PA Ubel 2008 Improving understanding of adjuvant therapy options by using simpler risk graphics Cancer 113 12 3382 3390 19012353 10.1002/cncr.23959
6. Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Fagerlin A, Ubel PA (2010) A demonstration of "less can be more" in risk graphics. Med Decis Making. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10364244
7. DW Hutton JK Belkora RD Shachter DH Moore 2009 Are patients getting the "gist" in risk communication? Patient understanding of prognosis in breast cancer treatment J Cancer Educ 24 194 199 19526406 10.1080/ 08858190902876452
8. JK Belkora HS Rugo DH Moore DW Hutton DF Chen LJ Esserman 2009 Oncologist use of the adjuvant! model for risk communication: a pilot study examining patient knowledge of 10-year prognosis BMC Cancer 9 127 19400938 10.1186/1471-2407-9-127
9. IM Lipkus E Peters G Kimmick V Liotcheva P Marcom 2010 Breast cancer patients' treatment expectations after exposure to the decision aid program adjuvant online: the influence of numeracy Med Decis Making 30 464 473 20160070 10.1177/0272989X09360371
10. CH Braddock 3rd KA Edwards NM Hasenberg TL Laidley W Levinson 1999 Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics JAMA 282 24 2313 2320 10612318 10.1001/jama.282.24.2313 (Pubitemid 30013062)
11. E Peters N Dieckmann A Dixon JH Hibbard CK Mertz 2007 Less is more in presenting quality information to consumers Med Care Res Rev 64 2 169 190 17406019 10.1177/10775587070640020301 (Pubitemid 46570715)
12. SS Iyengar MR Lepper 2000 When choice is demotivating: can one desire too much of a good thing? J Pers Soc Psychol 79 6 995 1006 11138768 10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.995 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7ksFSktw%3D%3D
13. Schwartz B (2004) The paradox of choice: why more is less, 1st edn. Harper Collins, New York
14. A Fagerlin C Wang PA Ubel 2005 Reducing the influence of anecdotal reasoning on people's health care decisions: is a picture worth a thousand statistics? Med Decis Making 25 4 398 405 16061891 10.1177/0272989X05278931 (Pubitemid 41023166)
15. BJ Zikmund-Fisher A Fagerlin TR Roberts HA Derry PA Ubel 2008 Alternate methods of framing information about medication side effects: incremental risk versus total risk occurence J Health Commun 13 2 107 124 18300064 10.1080/10810730701854011 (Pubitemid 351304461)
16. D Feldman-Stewart MD Brundage V Zotov 2007 Further insight into the perception of quantitative information: judgments of gist in treatment decisions Med Decis Making 27 34 43 17237451 10.1177/0272989X06297101 (Pubitemid 46068150)
17. EA Waters ND Weinstein GA Colditz KM Emmons 2007 Reducing aversion to side effects in preventive medical treatment decisions J Exp Psychol Appl 13 1 11 21 17385998 10.1037/1076-898X.13.1.11
18. M Price R Cameron P Butow 2007 Communicating risk information: the influence of graphical display format on quantitative information perception-accuracy, comprehension and preferences Patient Educ Couns 69 121 128 17905553 10.1016/j.pec.2007.08.006 (Pubitemid 350051682)
19. A Fagerlin BJ Zikmund-Fisher PA Ubel A Jankovic H Derry DM Smith 2007 Measuring numeracy without a math test: development of the subjective numeracy scale (SNS) Med Decis Making 27 5 672 680 17641137 10.1177/0272989X07304449 (Pubitemid 47547594)
20. BJ Zikmund-Fisher DM Smith PA Ubel A Fagerlin 2007 Validation of the subjective numeracy scale (SNS): effects of low numeracy on comprehension of risk communications and utility elicitations Med Decis Making 27 5 663 671 17652180 10.1177/0272989X07303824 (Pubitemid 47547593)
21. Stata statistical software (2009) 11 edn. Stata Corporation, College Station, TX
22. J Hinson T Jameson P Whitney 2003 Impulsive decision making and working memory J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 29 298 306 12696817 10.1037/0278-7393.29.2. 298 (Pubitemid 38413924)
23. Yates JF, Veinott ES, Patalano AL (2003) Hard decisions, bad decisions: on decision quality and decision aiding. In: Schneider SL, Shanteau JC (eds) Emerging perspectives on judgment and decision research. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 13-63
24. J Huber JW Payne C Puto 1982 Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis J Consumer Res 9 80 98 10.1086/208899
25. CK Hsee S Blount GF Lowenstein MH Bazerman 1999 Preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of options: a review and theoretical analysis Psychol Bull 125 5 576 590 10.1037/0033-2909.125.5.576
26. BJ Zikmund-Fisher A Fagerlin PA Ubel 2004 "Is 28% good or bad?" Evaluability and preference reversals in health care decisions Med Decis Making 24 2 142 148 15090100 10.1177/0272989X04263154 (Pubitemid 38391934)
27. A Tversky 1969 Intransitivity of preferences Psychol Rev 76 1 31 48 10.1037/h0026750