Cancer as a problem to be solved: Internet use and provider communication by men with cancer

CIN - Computers Informatics Nursing

Volumn 29, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 388-395

  Dickerson, Suzanne S ^a   Reinhart, Amber ^b   Boemhke, Marcia ^a   Akhu Zaheya, Laila ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI ST LOUIS   (United States)

^c JORDAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Jordan)

Author keywords

Cancer; Communication; Consumer; Health information; Internet

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION SEEKING; INTERNET; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTATE TUMOR; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COMMUNICATION; HUMANS; INFORMATION SEEKING BEHAVIOR; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;

EID: 79960842700     PISSN: 15382931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/NCN.0b013e3181f9ddb1     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Institute of Medicine. Cancer Care for the Whole Patient: Meeting the Psychosocial Health Needs. Alder NE, Page AEK, eds. Washington DC: National Academies Press; 2008.
2. Dickerson SS, Boehmke M, Ogle C, Brown JK. Seeking and managing hope: oncology patients' experiences using the Internet for cancer care. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2006;33(1):E1-E10.
3. Jones S, Fox S. Generations Online in 2009. Pew Internet & American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org. Accessed February 17, 2009.
4. Fox S. The Engaged e-Patient Population, People Turn to the Internet for Health Information When the Stakes Are High and the Connection Fast. Pew Internet & American Live Project. http://www.pewinternet.org. Accessed February 17, 2009.
5. American Cancer Society. Cancer statistics 2008. http://www.cancer.org/ docroot/PRO/content/PRO-1-1-Cancer-Statistics-2008-Presentation.asp. Accessed February 17, 2009.
6. Eysenbach G. The impact of Internet on cancer outcomes. Cancer J Clin. 2003;53:356-371.
7. Im EO, CheeW. The use of Internet cancer support groups by ethnic minorities. J Transcult Nurs. 2008;19:74-82.
8. Oriet P, Cudney S, Weiner C. Rural women find support online. Nurse Pract. 2007;32:37-40.
9. Seale C, Ziebland S, Charteris-Black J. Gender, cancer experience and Internet use. A comparative keyword analysis of interviews and online cancer support groups. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62:2577-2590.
10. Klemm P, Bunnell D, Cullen M, Soneji R, Gibbons P, Holecek A. Online cancer support groups: a review of the research literature. Comput Inform Nurs. 2003;21:136-142.
11. Galdas PM, Cheater F, Marshall P. Men and health help-seeking behaviour: literature review. J Adv Nurs. 2005;49:616-623. (Pubitemid 40417364)
12. Möller-Leimkühler A. Barriers to help-seeking by men: a review of sociocultural and clinical literature with particular reference to depression. J Affect Disord. 2002;71:1-9.
13. Klemm P, Hurst M, Dearholt S, Trone S. Cyber Solace: gender differences on Internet cancer support groups. Comput Inform Nurs. 1999;17:65-72.
14. Dickerson SS. Gender differences in stories of Internet use. Health Care Women Int. 2003;25:434-451. (Pubitemid 37412203)
15. Heidegger M. Being and Time. Macquarrie J, Robinson E, trans. New York: Harper & Row. 1962. Original work published in 1927.
16. DiekelmannN, Allen D, Tanner C. The NLN Criteria for Appraisal of Baccalaureate Programs: A Critical Hermeneutic Analysis. New York: National League for Nursing; 1989.
17. Diekelmann N, Ironside P. Hermeneutics. In: Fitzpatrick J, ed. Encyclopedia of Nursing Research. New York: Springer Publications; 1998:243-245.