Sex-dependent selection differentially shapes genetic variation on and off the guppy Y chromosome

Evolution

Volumn 65, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 2145-2156

  Postma, Erik ^a,b   Spyrou, Nicolle ^a   Rollins, Lee Ann ^a   Brooks, Robert C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Animal model; Fitness surface; G matrix; Intra locus sexual conflict; Poecilia reticulata; Sex chromosome

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; ANTAGONISM; BODY SIZE; CHROMOSOME; CORRELATION; CYPRINID; EVOLUTIONARY THEORY; FITNESS; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; ORNAMENTATION; SEXUAL CONFLICT;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BREEDING; CYPRINODONTIFORMES; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOME; MALE; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; Y CHROMOSOME;

ANIMALS; BREEDING; FEMALE; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME; MALE; MODELS, ANIMAL; POECILIA; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; Y CHROMOSOME;

ANIMALIA; CYPRINODONTIFORMES; POECILIA RETICULATA;

EID: 79960839125     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01314.x     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Agrawal, A. F., and J. R. Stinchcombe. 2009. How much do genetic covariances alter the rate of adaptation? Proc. R. Soc. Biol. Lond. B 276:1183-1191.
2. Angus, R. A. 1989. A genetic overview of Poeciliid fishes. Pp. 51-68 in, G. K. Meffe and F. F. J. Snelson, eds. Ecology and evolution of livebearing fishes (Poeciliidae). Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
3. Armstrong, S. J., and D. A. Filatov. 2008. A cytogenetic view of sex chromosome evolution in plants. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 120:241-246.
4. Bischoff, R. J., J. L. Gould, and D. I. Rubenstein. 1985. Tail size and female choice in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 17:253-255.
5. Blows, M. W. 2007. A tale of two matrices: multivariate approaches in evolutionary biology. J. Evol. Biol. 20:1-8.
6. Blows, M. W., and R. Brooks. 2003. Measuring nonlinear selection. Am. Nat. 162:815-820.
7. Blows, M. W., R. Brooks, and P. G. Kraft. 2003. Exploring complex fitness surfaces: multiple ornamentation and polymorphism in male guppies. Evolution 57:1622-1630.
8. Blows, M. W., S. F. Chenoweth, and E. Hine. 2004. Orientation of the genetic variance-covariance matrix and the fitness surface for multiple male sexually selected traits. Am. Nat. 163:329-340.
9. Bonduriansky, R., and S. F. Chenoweth. 2009. Intralocus sexual conflict. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24:280-288.
10. Breden, F., M. B. Ptacek, M. Rashed, D. Taphorn, and C. A. Figueiredo. 1999. Molecular phylogeny of the live-bearing fish genus Poecilia (Cyprinodontiformes: Poeciliidae). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 12:95-104.
11. Brooks, R. 2000. Negative genetic correlation between male sexual attractiveness and survival. Nature 406:67-70.
12. Brooks, R., and J. A. Endler. 2001. Direct and indirect sexual selection and quantitative genetics of male traits in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Evolution 55:1002-1015.
13. Chenoweth, S. F., and M. W. Blows. 2005. Contrasting mutual sexual selection on homologous signal traits in Drosophila serrata. Am. Nat. 165:281-289.
14. Chenoweth, S. F., and M. W. Blows. 2006. Dissecting the complex genetic basis of mate choice. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7:681-692.
15. Chippindale, A. K., and W. R. Rice. 2001. Y chromosome polymorphism is a strong determinant of male fitness in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:5677-5682.
16. Connallon, T., and E. Jakubowski. 2009. Association between sex ratio distortion and sexually antagonistic fitness consequences of female choice. Evolution 63:2179-2183.
17. Day, T., and R. Bonduriansky. 2004. Intralocus sexual conflict can drive the evolution of genomic imprinting. Genetics 167:1537-1546.
18. Delph, L. F., A. M. Arntz, C. Scotti-Saintagne, and I. Scotti. 2010. The genomic architecture of sexual dimorphism in the dioecious plant silene latifolia. Evolution 64:2873-2886.
19. Ellegren, H., and J. Parsch. 2007. The evolution of sex-biased genes and sex-biased gene expression. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8:689-698.
20. Endler, J. A. 1980. Natural selection on color patterns in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 34:76-91.
21. Endler, J. A., and A. E. Houde. 1995. Geographic variation in female preferences for male traits in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 49:456-468.
22. Fairbairn, D. J., and D. A. Roff. 2006. The quantitative genetics of sexual dimorphism: assessing the importance of sex-linkage. Heredity 97:319-328.
23. Farr, J. A. 1977. Male rarity or novelty, female choice behavior, and sexual selection in guppy, Poecilia reticulata Peters (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Evolution 31:162-168.
24. Fisher, R. A. 1931. The evolution of dominance. Biol. Rev. 6:345-368.
25. Fitzpatrick, M. J. 2004. Pleiotropy and the genomic location of sexually selected genes. Am. Nat. 163:800-808.
26. Foley, B., S. F. Chenoweth, S. V. Nuzhdin, and M. W. Blows. 2007. Natural genetic variation in cuticular hydrocarbon expression in male and female Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 175:1465-1477.
27. Fry, J. D. 2004. Estimation of genetic variances and covariances by restricted maximum likelihood using PROC MIXED. Pp. 11-34 in S. A. M., ed. Genetic analysis of complex traits using SAS. SAS Institute Inc., NC.
28. Fry, J. D. 2010. The genomic location of sexually antagonistic variation: some cautionary comments. Evolution 64:1510-1516.
29. Gibson, J. R., A. K. Chippindale, and W. R. Rice. 2002. The X chromosome is a hot spot for sexually antagonistic fitness variation. Proc. R. Soc. Biol. Lond. B 269:499-505.
30. Graves, J. A. M. 1995. The origin and function of the mammalian Y chromosome and the Y-borne genes- an evolving understanding. Bioessays 17:311-321.
31. Hadfield, J. D. 2010. MCMC methods for multi-response generalised linear mixed models: the MCMCglmm R package. J. Stat. Softw. 33:1-22.
32. Harano, T., K. Okada, S. Nakayama, T. Miyatake, and D. J. Hosken. 2010. Intralocus sexual conflict unresolved by sex-limited trait expression. Curr. Biol. 20:2036-2039.
33. Hill, W. G., and R. Thompson. 1978. Probabilities of non-positive definite between-group or genetic covariance matrices. Biometrics 34:429-439.
34. Hine, E., and M. W. Blows. 2006. Determining the effective dimensionality of the genetic variance-covariance matrix. Genetics 173:1135-1144.
35. Houde, A. E. 1987. Mate choice based upon naturally occurring color pattern variation in a guppy population. Evolution 41:1-10.
36. Houde, A. E. 1992. Sex-linked heritability of a sexually selected character in a natural population of Poecilia reticulata (Pisces: Poeciliidae) (guppies). Heredity 69:229-235.
37. Houde, A. E. 1997. Sex, color and mate choice in Guppies. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
38. Hrbek, T., J. Seckinger, and A. Meyer. 2007. A phylogenetic and biogeographic perspective on the evolution of Poeciliid fishes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 43:986-998.
39. Hughes, K. A., L. Du, F. H. Rodd, and D. N. Reznick. 1999. Familiarity leads to female mate preference for novel males in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Anim. Behav. 58:907-916.
40. Hughes, K. A., F. H. Rodd, and D. N. Reznick. 2005. Genetic and environmental effects on secondary sex traits in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). J. Evol. Biol. 18:35-45.
41. Hunt, J., M. W. Blows, F. Zajitschek, M. D. Jennions, and R. Brooks. 2007. Reconciling strong stabilizing selection with the maintenance of genetic variation in a natural population of black field crickets (Teleogryllus commodus). Genetics 177:875-880.
42. Johnson, T., and N. Barton. 2005. Theoretical models of selection and mutation on quantitative traits. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 360:1411-1425.
43. Kitano, J., J. A. Ross, S. Mori, M. Kume, F. C. Jones, Y. F. Chan, D. M. Absher, J. Grimwood, J. Schmutz, R. M. Myers, et al. 2009. A role for a neo-sex chromosome in stickleback speciation. Nature 461:1079-1083.
44. Kokko, H., R. Brooks, J. M. McNamara, and A. I. Houston. 2002. The sexual selection continuum. Proc. R. Soc. Biol. Lond. B 269:1331-1340.
45. Kokko, H., M. D. Jennions, and R. Brooks. 2006. Unifying and testing models of sexual selection. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37:43-66.
46. Kruuk, L. E. B. 2004. Estimating genetic parameters in natural populations using the 'animal model'. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 359:873-890.
47. Krzanowski, W. J. 1979. Between-groups comparison of principal components. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 74:703-707.
48. Lande, R., and S. J. Arnold. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:1210-1226.
49. Lemos, B., L. O. Araripe, and D. L. Hartl. 2008. Polymorphic Y chromosomes harbor cryptic variation with manifold functional consequences. Science 319:91-93.
50. Lindholm, A., and F. Breden. 2002. Sex chromosomes and sexual selection in Poeciliid fishes. Am. Nat. 160:s214-s224.
51. Lindholm, A. K., F. Breden, H. J. Alexander, W. K. Chan, S. G. Thakurta, and R. Brooks. 2005. Invasion success and genetic diversity of introduced populations of guppies Poecilia reticulata in Australia. Mol. Ecol. 14:3671-3682.
52. Lynch, M., and B. Walsh. 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
53. Meyer, K. 2006. WOMBAT - Digging deep for quantitative genetic analyses by restricted maximum likelihood. Proceedings of the 8th world congress on genetics applied to livestock production: Communication No Pp. 27-14.
54. Meyer, K., and M. Kirkpatrick. 2010. Better estimates of genetic covariance matrices by "bending" using penalized maximum likelihood. Genetics 185:1097-1110.
55. Miller, L. K., and R. Brooks. 2005. The effects of genotype, age, and social environment on male ornamentation, mating behavior, and attractiveness. Evolution 59:2414-2425.
56. Nanda, I., W. Feichtinger, M. Schmid, J. H. Schröder, H. Zischler, and, J. T. Epplen. 1990. Simple repetitive sequences are associated with differentiation of the sex chromosomes in the guppy fish. J. Mol. Evol. 30:456-462.
57. Olendorf, R., F. H. Rodd, D. Punzalan, A. E. Houde, C. Hurt, D. N. Reznick, and K. A. Hughes. 2006. Frequency-dependent survival in natural guppy populations. Nature 441:633-636.
58. Pischedda, A., and A. K. Chippindale. 2006. Intralocus sexual conflict diminishes the benefits of sexual selection. PLoS Biol. 4:2099-2103.
59. Postma, E., S. C. Griffith, and R. Brooks. 2006. Evolutionary genetics-evolution of mate choice in the wild. Nature 444:E16-E16.
60. Qvarnström, A., J. E. Brommer, and L. Gustafsson. 2006. Testing the geneticsunderlying the co-evolution of mate choice and ornament in the wild. Nature 441:84-86.
61. R Development Core Team. 2010. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
62. Reynolds, R. J., D. K. Childers, and N. M. Pajewski. 2010. The distribution and hypothesis testing of eigenvalues from the canonical analysis of the gamma matrix of quadratic and correlational selection gradients. Evolution 64:1076-1085.
63. Rice, W. R. 1984. Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38:735-742.
64. Rice, W. R. 1987. The accumulation of sexually antagonistic genes as a selective agent promoting the evolution of reduced recombination between primitive sex chromosomes. Evolution 41:911-914.
65. Rice, W. R. 1994. Degeneration of a nonrecombining chromosome. Science 263:230-232.
66. Rice, W. R. 1996. Evolution of the Y sex chromosome in animals. Bioscience 46:331-343.
67. Stinchcombe, J. R., A. F. Agrawal, P. A. Hohenlohe, S. J. Arnold, and, M. W. Blows. 2008. Estimating nonlinear selection gradients using quadratic regression coefficients: double or nothing? Evolution 62:2435-2440.
68. Traut, W., and H. Winking. 2001. Meiotic chromosomes and stages of sex chromosome evolution in fish: zebrafish, platyfish and guppy. Chromosome Res. 9:659-672.
69. Tripathi, N., M. Hoffmann, E.-M. Willing, C. Lanz, D. Weigel, and C. Dreyer. 2009. Genetic linkage map of the guppy, Poecilia reticulata, and quantitative trait loci analysis of male size and colour variation. Proc. R. Soc. Biol. Lond. B 276:2195-2208.
70. Wilson, A. J., D. Reale, M. N. Clements, M. M. Morrissey, E. Postma, C. A. Walling, L. E. B. Kruuk, and D. H. Nussey. 2010. An ecologist's guide to the animal model. J. Anim. Ecol. 79:13-26.
71. Winge, T. 1927. The location of eighteen genes in Lebistes reticulatus. J. Genet. 18:1-42.
72. Yamamoto, T. O. 1975. The medaka, Oryzias latipes, and the guppy, Lebistes reticularis. Pp. 133-149 in R. C. King, ed. Handbook of genetics. Plenum, New York.
73. Zajitschek, S. R. K., and R. C. Brooks. 2008. Distinguishing the effects of familiarity, relatedness, and color pattern rarity on attractiveness and measuring their effects on sexual selection in guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Am. Nat. 172:843-854.
74. Zajitschek, S. R. K., and R. C. Brooks. 2010. Inbreeding depression in male traits and preference for outbred males in Poecilia reticulata. Behav. Ecol. 21:884-891.
75. Zajitschek, S. R. K., A. K. Lindholm, J. P. Evans, and R. C. Brooks. 2009. Experimental evidence that high levels of inbreeding depress sperm competitiveness. J. Evol. Biol. 22:1338-1345.