Decisions to update comparative drug effectiveness reviews vary based on type of new evidence

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 64, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 977-984

  Peterson, Kim ^a   McDonagh, Marian S ^a   Fu, Rongwei ^a,b  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Comparative effectiveness; Drugs; Methods; Need; Systematic review; Updating

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT; CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKING AGENT; CARDIOVASCULAR AGENT; HORMONES AND AGENTS ACTING ON THE ENDOCRINE SYSTEM; HYDROXYMETHYLGLUTARYL COENZYME A REDUCTASE INHIBITOR; PSYCHOTROPIC AGENT; RESPIRATORY TRACT AGENT;

COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG IDENTIFICATION; DRUG RESEARCH; DRUG SAFETY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HORMONAL THERAPY; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TIME;

EID: 79960838961     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: 18785921     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.11.019     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. C. Garritty, A. Tsertsvadze, A.C. Tricco, M. Sampson, and D. Moher Updating systematic reviews: an international survey PLoS One 5 2010 e9914 10.1371/journal.pone.0009914
2. M. Clarke, P. Tharyan, and S. Green Response from the Cochrane collaboration Lancet 371 2008 384 385 (Pubitemid 351173315)
3. S.D. French, S. McDonald, J.E. McKenzie, and S.E. Green Investing in updating: how do conclusions change when Cochrane systematic reviews are updated? BMC Med Res Methodol 5 2005 33
4. J.P.T. Higgins, and S. Green Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.2 [updated September 2009]. The Cochrane Collaboration 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Hoboken, NJ Available at www.cochrane- handbook.org
5. D. Moher, A. Tsertsvadze, A.C. Tricco, M. Eccles, J. Grimshaw, and M. Sampson A systematic review identified few methods and strategies describing when and how to update systematic reviews J Clin Epidemiol 60 2007 1095 1104
6. D. Moher, A. Tsertsvadze, A.C. Tricco, M. Eccles, J. Grimshaw, and M. Sampson When and how to update systematic reviews Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1 2008 MR000023
7. M. Sampson, K.G. Shojania, J. McGowan, R. Daniel, T. Rader, and A.E. Iansavichene Surveillance search techniques identified the need to update systematic reviews J Clin Epidemiol 61 2008 755 762
8. K. Shojania, M. Sampson, M. Ansari, J. Ji, C. Garritty, and J. Doucette Updating systematic reviews. Technical Review No. 16 Prepared by the University of Ottawa Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-02-0017 2007 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Rockville, MD
9. K.G. Shojania, M. Sampson, M.T. Ansari, J. Ji, S. Doucette, and D. Moher How quickly do systematic reviews go out of date? A survival analysis [see comment] Ann Intern Med 147 2007 224 233 (Pubitemid 351664578)
10. D. Weller Managing and Updating the Evidence. Evidence-based health advice workshop 1998 Abstract
11. Lutje V, MacLehose H, Garner P. [P156] Editorial strategy for revising Cochrane reviews: does it help? 13th Cochrane Colloquium; 2005; Melbourne, Australia.
12. S. Wieland, and K. Dickersin Selective exposure reporting and Medline indexing limited the search sensitivity for observational studies of the adverse effects of oral contraceptives J Clin Epidemiol 58 2005 560 567 (Pubitemid 40692721)