Disentangling The Thick Concept Argument

SATS

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 63-78

  Blomberg, Olle ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

disentangling; John McDowell; moral concepts; non cognitivism; Simon Blackburn; thick concepts

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960829416     PISSN: 16001974     EISSN: 18697577     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/SATS.2007.63     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Altham, J. E. J. (1986) ‘The Legacy of Emotivism’. In: G. McDonald & C. Wright (eds.): Fact, Science and Morality. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 275-88.
2. Anderson, Elizabeth (1993) Value in Ethics and in Economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3. Ayer, Alfred Jules (2001) [1936] Language, Truth and Logic. London: Penguin Books. Barker, Stephen (2000) ‘Is Value Content a Component of Conversational Implica-ture?’. Analysis 60, pp. 268-279.
4. Blackburn, Simon (1981) ‘Reply: Rule-Following and Moral Realism’. In: S. Holtzman & C. Leich (eds.): Wittgenstein: To Follow a Rule. London: Routledge, pp. 163-87.
5. (1986) ‘Making Ends Meet’. Philosophical Books 27(4), pp. 193-203.
6. (1992) ‘Through Thick and Thin’. The Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 66, pp. 285-299.
7. (1998) Ruling Passions: A Theory of Practical Reasoning. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
8. Burton, Stephen L. (1992) ‘Thick Concepts Revised’. Analysis 57, pp. 28-32. Rpt. in: A. Fisher & S. Kirchin (eds.): Arguing About Metaethics. Routledge, 2006.
9. Crary, Alice (2002) ‘Why Can't Moral Thought Be Everything It Seems?’. Philosophical Forum 33(4), pp. 373-91.
10. Dancy, Jonathan (1998) ‘Can A Particularist Learn The Difference Between Right and Wrong’. In: K. Brinkmann (ed.): Proceedings of the 20th World Congress of Philosophy, Volume 1: Ethics, pp. 59-72.
11. (1996) ‘In Defence of Thick Concepts’. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 20, pp. 263-279.
12. Dennett, Daniel C. (1995) ‘Intuition Pumps’, in: John Brockman (ed.), The Third Culture: Beyond The Scientific Revolution, Simon & Schuster, New York, pp. 181-197.
13. Gibbard, Allan (1990) Wise Choices, Apt Feelings: A Theory of Normative Judgment. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
14. Gibbard, Allan (1992) ‘Thick Concepts and Warrant for Feelings’. The Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 66, pp. 267-283.
15. Guarini, Marcello (2005) ‘Particularism and Generalism: How AI can Help us to Better Understand Moral Cognition’. In: G. M. Anderson, S. L. Anderson & C. Arme (eds.): Machine Ethics: Papers from the 2005 Fall Symposium. Technical Report FS-05-06, American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park, California, pp. 52-61.
16. Guarini, Marcello (2006) ‘Particularism and the Classification and Reclassification of Moral Cases’. IEEE Intelligent Systems 21(4) (July/August), pp. 22-28.
17. Hare, R. M. (1963) Freedom and Reason. London: Oxford University Press.
18. (1970) [1952] The Language of Morals. London: Oxford University Press.
19. (1997) Sorting Out Ethics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
20. Hurley, Susan (1983) ‘Objectivity and Disagreement’. In: T. Honderich (ed.): Morality and Objectivity: Essays in Honour of John Mackie. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 54-97.
21. Jackson, Frank (1999) ‘Non-Cognitivism, Validity and Conditionals’. In: D. Jamieson (ed.): Singer and His Critics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 18-37.
22. Koons, Jeremy R. (2001) ‘Emotions and Incommensurable Moral Concepts’. Philosophy 76(4), pp. 585-604.
23. Lang, Gerald (2001) ‘The Rule-Following Considerations and Metaethics: Some False Moves’. European Journal of Philosophy 9(2), pp. 190-209.
24. Lovibond, Sabina (1983) Realism and Imagination in Ethics. Oxford Basil Blackwell.
25. Mackie, John (1977) Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. Penguin Books.
26. McDowell, John (1978) ‘Are Moral Requirements Hypothetical Imperatives?’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, suppl. vol. 52, pp. 13-29.
27. (1979) ‘Virtue and Reason’. Monist62, pp. 331-50.
28. (1981) Non-Cognitivism and Rule-Following. In: S. Holtzman & C. Leich (eds.): Wittgenstein: To Follow a Rule. London: Routledge, pp. 141-162.
29. (1998) Mind, Value, and Reality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30. Miller, Alexander (2003) An Introduction to Contemporary Metaethics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
31. Millgram, Elijah (1995) ‘Inhaltsreiche ethische Begriffe und die Unterscheidung zwischen Tatsachen und Werten’. In: C. Fehige & G. Meggle (eds.): Zum mor-alischen Denken. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp. An English draft, ‘Thick Ethical Concepts and the Fact-Value Distinction’ is available at http://content.lib.utah. edu/u?/ir-main, 845 (accessed July 3, 2007).
32. Putnam, Hilary (2002) The Collapse of The Fact/Value Dichotomy and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
33. Smith, Michael (1994) The Moral Problem. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
34. Stevenson, Charles L. (1938) ‘Persuasive Definitions’. Mind 47, 187, pp. 331-50.
35. (1948): Ethics and Language. New Haven: Yale University Press.
36. Taylor, Charles (2003) ‘Ethics and Ontology’. The Journal of Philosophy 100(6), pp. 305-20.
37. Van Roojen, Mark (2005) ‘Expressivism, Supervenience and Logic’. Ratio (new series) 18, pp. 190-205.
38. Williams, Bernard (1985) Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39. (1986) ‘Reply to Simon Blackburn’. Philosophical Books 27(4), pp. 203-8.