State policies and private higher education in the USA: Understanding the variation in comparative perspective

Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 425-442

  Zumeta, William ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960810508     PISSN: 13876988     EISSN: 15725448     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13876988.2011.583110     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Benedetti, B., 2007, Report on State Assistance Programs Benefiting Independent Colleges and Their Students, 2006 Session, (National Association of Independent College & University State Executives State-National Information Network).
2. Bernasconi, A., 2011, A Legal Perspective on "Privateness" and "Publicness" in Latin American Higher Education. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 13(4).
3. Birnbaum, R., 1983, Maintaining Diversity in Higher Education, (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass).
4. Bowen, W. and Breneman, D., 1993, Student aid: Price discount or educational investment? The Brookings Review, 11(1), pp. 28-31.
5. Breneman, D., 1981, Strategies for the 1980s, in: James R. Mingle and Associates (Ed.) Challenges of Retrenchment: Strategies for Consolidating Programs, Cutting Costs, and Reallocating Resources, (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass), pp. 16-31.
6. Burke, J. C., 2005, The many faces of accountability, in: Burke and Associates (Ed.) Achieving Accountability in Higher Education: Balancing Public, Academic, and Market Demands, (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass), pp. 1-24.
7. College Board, 2008a, Trends in College Pricing, (Washington, DC: Author).
8. College Board, 2008b, Trends in Student Aid, (Washington, DC: Author).
9. Cook, C. E., 1998, Lobbying for Higher Education: How Colleges and Universities Influence Federal Policy, (Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press).
10. Dahl, R. A. and Lindblom, C. E., 1953, Politics, Economics and Welfare: Planning and Politico-Economic Systems Resolved into Basic Social Processes, (New York: Harper).
11. Education Commission of the States, 2001, Postsecondary Education Structures Database, PS-01-02W (Denver: Author).
12. Ewell, P. and Boeke, M. 2007, Critical connections: Linking states'unit record systems to track student progress. Lumina Foundation for Education, New Agenda, Series, January (Indianapolis: Lumina).
13. Gournitzka, A. and Maasen, P., 2000, Hybrid steering approaches with respect to European higher education. Higher Education Policy, 13, pp. 267-285.
14. Howlett, M., 1991, Policy instruments, policy styles, and policy implementation: National approaches to theories of instrument choice. Policy Studies Journal, 19, pp. 1-21.
15. Kinser, K., 2007, Dimensions of corporate ownership of for-profit higher education. Review of Higher Education, 30(3), pp. 217-245.
16. Kirschen, E. S., 1964, Economic Policy in Our Time, (Amsterdam: North Holland).
17. Levy, D., 2007, Legitimacy and privateness: Central and East European private higher education in global context, in: S. Slantcheva and D. Levy (Eds) Private Higher Education in Post-Communist Europe: In Search of Legitimacy, (London: Palgrave/MacMillan), pp. 279-298.
18. Levy, D., 2008, The enlarged expansion of private higher education. Die Hochschule, 2, pp. 19-35.
19. Levy, D. C., 2011, Public Policy for Private Higher Education: A Global Analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 13(4).
20. Levy, D., forthcoming, Viewing private higher education: How much, where, why, and what, in: B. McGaw, P. Peterson and E. Baker (Eds) International Encyclopedia of Education, 3rd ed. (Amsterdam: Elsevier).
21. Linder, S. H. and Peters, B. G., 1989, Instruments of government: Perceptions and contexts. Journal of Public Policy, 9, pp. 35-38.
22. National Association of State Student Grant and Aid Programs, 2009, 39th Annual Survey Report on State-Sponsored Student Financial Aid, 2007-2008 Academic Year, (Author).
23. Neave, G. and van Vught, F., 1991, Prometheus Bound: The Changing Relationship Between Government and Higher Education in Western Europe, (Oxford: Pergamon).
24. Pachuashvili, P., 2011, Governmental Policies and Their Impact on Private Higher Education Development in Post-Communist Countries: Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania and Georgia, 1990-2005. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 13(4).
25. Pusser, B., 2006, New competition from for-profit providers. AGB Priorities, 27, pp. 1-15.
26. Salamon, L. M. (Ed.), 2002, The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance, (New York: Oxford University Press).
27. Thompson, F. and Zumeta, W., 2001, Effects of key state policies on private colleges and universities: Sustaining private sector capacity in the face of the higher education access challenge. Economics of Education Review, 20, pp. 517-531.
28. Tierney, W. and Hentschke, G., 2007, New Players, Different Game: Understanding the Rise of For-Profit Colleges and Universities, (Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press).
29. Trow, M., 1993, Federalism in American higher education, in: A. Levine (Ed.) Higher Learning in America 1980-2000, (Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press), pp. 39-66.
30. Zumeta, W., 1992, State policies and private higher education: Policies, correlates and linkages. Journal of Higher Education, 63(4), pp. 363-417.
31. Zumeta, W., 1996, Meeting the demand for higher education without breaking the bank. Journal of Higher Education, 67(4), pp. 367-425.
32. Zumeta, W., 2005, Accountability and the private sector: State and federal perspectives, in: Joseph Burke and Associates (Ed.) The Many Faces of Accountability: Holding Higher Education Responsible for Performance, (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass), pp. 25-54.