Biological versus technical variability in 2-D DIGE experiments with environmental bacteria

Proteomics

Volumn 11, Issue 16, 2011, Pages 3380-3389

  Zech, Hajo ^a   Echtermeyer, Christoph ^a   Wöhlbrand, Lars ^a   Blasius, Bernd ^a   Rabus, Ralf ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR MARINE MICROBIOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bioinformatics; Image analysis; Two dimensional difference gel electrophoresis

Indexed keywords

PROTEOME;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AROMATOLEUM AROMATICUM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL VARIABILITY; CHEMISTRY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NONHUMAN; PHAEOBACTER GALLAECIENSIS; POPULATION ABUNDANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEOBACTERIA; TECHICAL VARIABILITY; TWO DIMENSIONAL DIFFERENCE GEL ELECTROPHORESIS;

ANAEROBIOSIS; BACTERIA; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; BENZENE DERIVATIVES; ELECTROPHORESIS, GEL, TWO-DIMENSIONAL; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PHENOLS; PROTEOME; PROTEOMICS; RHODOBACTERACEAE; RHODOCYCLACEAE; WATER MICROBIOLOGY;

PHAEOBACTER;

EID: 79960807912     PISSN: 16159853     EISSN: 16159861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201100071     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Görg, A., Weiss, W., Dunn, M., Current two-dimensional electrophoresis technology for proteomics. Proteomics 2004, 4, 3665-3685.
2. Klose, J., Large-gel 2-D electrophoresis. Methods Mol. Biol. 1999, 112, 147-172.
3. Ünlü, M., Morgan, M., Minden, J., Difference gel electrophoresis. A single gel method for detecting changes in protein extracts. Electrophoresis 1997, 18, 2071-2077.
4. Alban, A., David, S., Bjorkesten, L., Andersson, C. et al., A novel experimental design for comparative two-dimensional gel analysis: two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis incorporating a pooled internal standard. Proteomics 2003, 3, 36-44.
5. Gade, D., Thiermann, J., Markowsky, D., Rabus, R., Evaluation of two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis for protein profiling. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2003, 5, 240-251.
6. Jorge, I., Navarro, R., Lenz, C., Ariza, D. et al., The Holm Oak leaf proteome: analytical and biological variability in the protein expression level assessed by 2-DE and protein identification tandem mass spectrometry de novo sequencing and sequence similarity searching. Proteomics 2005, 5, 222-234.
7. Karp, N. A., Spencer, M., Lindsay, H., O'Dell, K., Lilley, K. S., Impact of replicate types on proteomic expression analysis. J. Proteome Res. 2005, 4, 1867-1871.
8. Molloy, M. P., Brzezinski, E. E., Hang, J., McDowell, M. T., VanBogelen, R. A., Overcoming technical variation and biological variation in quantitative proteomics. Proteomics 2003, 3, 1912-1919.
9. Winkler, W., Zellner, M., Diestinger, M., Babeluk, R. et al., Biological variation of the platelet proteome in the elderly population and its implication for biomarker research. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2008, 7, 193-203.
10. Jackson, D., Herath, A., Swinton, J., Bramwell, D. et al., Considerations for powering a clinical proteomics study: normal variability in the human plasma proteome. Proteomics - Clin. Appl. 2009, 3, 394-407.
11. Tonge, R., Shaw, J., Middleton, B., Rowlinson, R. et al., Validation and development of fluorescence two-dimensional differential gel electrophoresis proteomics technology. Proteomics 2001, 1, 377-396.
12. Karp, N., Kreil, D., Lilley, K., Determining a significant change in protein expression with DeCyder™ during a pair-wise comparison using two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis. Proteomics 2004, 4, 1421-1432.
13. Rabus, R., Kube, M., Heider, J., Beck, A. et al., The genome sequence of an anaerobic aromatic-degrading denitrifying bacterium, strain EbN1. Arch. Microbiol. 2005, 183, 27-36.
14. Rabus, R., Widdel, F., Anaerobic degradation of ethylbenzene and other aromatic hydrocarbons by new denitrifying bacteria. Arch. Microbiol. 1995, 163, 96-103.
15. Wöhlbrand, L., Kallerhoff, B., Lange, D., Hufnagel, D. et al., Functional proteomic view of metabolic regulation in "Aromatoleum aromaticum" strain EbN1. Proteomics 2007, 7, 2222-2239.
16. Martens, T., Heidorn, T., Pukall, R., Simon, M. et al., Reclassification of Roseobacter gallaeciensis Ruiz-Ponte et al. 1998 as Phaeobacter gallaeciensis gen. nov., comb. nov., description of Phaeobacter inhibens sp. nov., reclassification of Ruegeria algicola (Lafay et al. 1995) Uchino et al. 1999 as Marinovum algicola gen. nov., comb. nov., and emended descriptions of the genera Roseobacter, Ruegeria and Leisingera. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2006, 56, 1293-1304.
17. Zech, H., Thole, S., Schreiber, K., Kalhöfer, D. et al., Growth phase-dependent global protein and metabolite profiles of Phaeobacter gallaeciensis strain DSM 17395, a member of the marine Roseobacter-clade. Proteomics 2009, 9, 3677-3697.
18. Wöhlbrand, L., Wilkes, H., Halder, T., Rabus, R., Anaerobic degradation of p-ethylphenol by "Aromatoleum aromaticum" strain EbN1: pathway, regulation, and involved proteins. J. Bacteriol. 2008, 190, 5699-5709.
19. Champion, K., Zengler, K., Rabus, R., Anaerobic degradation of ethylbenzene and toluene in denitrifying strain EbN1 proceeds via independent substrate-induced pathways. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1999, 1, 157-164.
20. Bradford, M., A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248-254.
21. Karp, N. A., Lilley, K. S., Maximising sensitivity for detecting changes in protein expression: experimental design using minimal CyDyes. Proteomics 2005, 5, 3105-3115.
22. Anderson, M. J., A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Aust. Ecol. 2001, 26, 32-46.
23. Clarke, K. R., Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust. J. Ecol. 1993, 18, 117-143.
24. Kruskal, J., Wish, M., Multidimensional Scaling. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks 1978.
25. Geyer, C., Computing Science and Statistics: Proceedings of the 23rd Symposium on the Interface, American Statistical Association, New York, 1991, pp. 156-163.
26. Swendsen, R. H., Wang, J.-S., Replica Monte Carlo simulation of spin-glasses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1986, 57, 2607.
27. Kruskal, J., Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika 1964, 29, 1-27.
28. Johnson, R., Wichern, D., Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs 2007.
29. Cairns, D., Statistical issues in quality control of proteomic analyses: good experimental desing and planning. Proteomics 2011, 11, 1037-1048.
30. Mariani, T., Budhraja, V., Mecham, B., Gu, C. et al., A variable fold change threshold determines significance for expression microarrays. FASEB J. 2003, 17, 321-323.
31. Olson, N., The microarray data analysis process: from raw data to biological significance. NeuroRx 2006, 3, 373-383.
32. Gade, D., Gobom, J., Rabus, R., Proteomic analysis of carbohydrate catabolism and regulation in the marine bacterium Rhodopirellula baltica. Proteomics 2005, 5, 3672-3683.
33. Kühner, S., Wöhlbrand, L., Fritz, I., Wruck, W. et al., Substrate-dependent regulation of anaerobic degradation pathways for toluene and ethylbenzene in a denitrifying bacterium, strain EbN1. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187, 1493-1503.