Importance of decision quality in breast cancer care

Psicooncologia

Volumn 7, Issue 2-3, 2010, Pages 313-328

  Sepucha, Karen R ^a   Belkora, Jeffrey ^b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Decision aids; Decision making

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

ADVERSE OUTCOME; ARTICLE; AUDIO RECORDING; BODY IMAGE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; CANCER CENTER; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER SURGERY; CANCER SURVIVOR; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL EVALUATION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; EARLY MENOPAUSE; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PATIENT REFERRAL; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITY OF LIFE; SELF CONCEPT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT PLANNING; UNITED STATES;

EID: 79960785914     PISSN: 16967240     EISSN: 19888287     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Spiegel D. How do you feel about cancer now?--Survival and psychosocial support. Public Health Report 1995; 110: 298-300.
2. Hegel MT, Moore CP, Collins ED, Kearing S, Gilllock KL, Riggs RL, et al. Distress, psychiatric syndromes, and impairment of function in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Cancer 2006; 107: 12924-31.
3. Nattinger AB, Gottlieb MS, Veum J, Yahnke D, Goodwin JS. Geographic variation in the use of breast-conserving treatment for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1992; 326(17): 1102-07.
4. McCahill LE, Privette E, James T, Sheehy-Jones J, Ratliff J, Majercik D, et al. Quality measures for breast cancer surgery: Initial validation of feasibility and assessment of variation among surgeons. Arch Surg 2009;144(5): 455-62.
5. The National Institute of Health. Treatment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer: NIH Consensus Development Conference Statement Online Jun 18-21,1990; 8(6): 1-19 Retrieved March 8, 2004 from http://consensus.nih.giv/1990EarlyStageBreast Cancer081html.htm
6. The National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference: Adjuvant Therapy for Breast Cancer. Bethesda, Maryland, USA. November 1-3, 2000. Proceedings. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2001; 30: 1-152.
7. Fagerlin A, Lakhani I, Lantz PM, Janz NK, Morrow M, Schwartz K, et al. An informed decision? Breast cancer patients and their knowledge about treatment. Patient Educ Couns 2006; 64(1-3): 303-12.
8. Ravdin P, Siminoff I, Harvey J. Survey of breast cancer patients concerning their knowledge and expectations of adjuvant therapy. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16(2): 515-21.
9. Peele PB, Siminoff LA, Xu Y, Ravdin PM. Decreased use of adjuvant breast cancer therapy in a randomized controlled trial of a decision aid with individualized risk information. Med Decis Making 2005; 25(3): 301-7.
10. Gawande A. The Checklist Manifesto: How to Get Things Right. New York, New York: Metropolitan Books, 2009.
11. Berry SA, Doll MC, McKinley KE, Casale AS, Bothe A. ProvenCare: Quality improvement model for designing highly reliable care in cardiac surgery. Jr Qual Saf Health Care 2009; 18(5): 360-8.
12. United States. President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Making health care decisions: A report on the ethnical and legal implications of informed consent in the patient-practitioner relationship. 1982, Washington, DC: President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research: For sale by the Supt. Of Docs., U.S. G.P.O. v. <1-3>.
13. Emanuel, EJ, Emanuel, LL. Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA 1992; 267(16): 2221-6.
14. Kasper J, Mulley A, Wennberg J. Developing shared decision-making programs to improve the quality of health care. Qual Rev Bull 1992; 18(6): 183-90.
15. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (Or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med 1997;44: 681-92.
16. Coulter A, Ellins J. Patient-focused interventions: A review of the evidence. London: The Health Foundation; 2006.
17. Greenfield S, Kaplan S, Ware J. Expanding patient involvement in care. Ann Intern Med 1985; 102: 520-8.
18. Kaplan S, Greenfield S, Ware J. Assessing the effects of physician-patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease. Med Care 1989; 27 Suppl 3: S110-S127.
19. Ford S, Fallowfield L, Lewis S. Can oncologists detect distress in the out-patients and how satisfied are they with their performance during bad news consultations? Br J Cancer 1994; 70(4): 767-70.
20. Joos S, Hickam D, Gordon G, Baker L. Effects of a physician communication intervention on patient care outcomes. J Gen Intern Med 1996; 11: 147-55.
21. Krupat E, Rosenkranz SL, Yeager CM, Barnard K, Putnam SM, Inui TS. The practice orientations of physicians and patients: The effect of doctor-patient congruence on satisfaction. Patient Edu Counsel 2000; 39(1): 49-59.
22. Andersen M, Urban N. Involvement in decision-making and breast cancer survivor quality of life. Ann Behav Med 1999; 21(3): 201-9.
23. Arora N. Interacting with cancer patients: the significance of physicians' communication behavior. Soc Sci Med 2003; 57(5): 791-806.
24. Morris T, Ingham R. Choice of surgery for early breast cancer: psychosocial considerations. Soc Sci Med 1988; 27:1257-62.
25. Katz SJ, Lantz PM, Paredes-Alexander Y, Janz NK. Breast cancer treatment experiences of Latinas in Los Angeles County. Am J Public Health 2005; 95(12):2225-30.
26. Lantz PM, Janz NK, Fagerlin A, Schwartz K, Liu L, Lakhani I, et al. Satisfaction with surgery outcomes and the decision process in a population-based sample of women with breast cancer. Health Serv. Res. 2005; 40(3): 745-67.
27. Fallowfield L. Truth sometimes hurts but deceit hurts more. In: Surbone A, Zwitter M, editors. New York: The New York Academy of Sciences; 1997. p. 525-36.
28. Liang W, Burnett C, Rowland J, Meropol N, Eggert L, Hwang Y, et al. Communication between physicians and older women with localized breast cancer: implications for treatment and patient satisfaction. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20(4): 1008-16.
29. Elwyn G, O'Connor A, Stacey D, Volk R, Edwards A, Coulter A, et al. Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process. BMJ 2006; 333(7565): 417.
30. O'Connor AM, Wennberg JE, Legare F, Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Moulton BW, Sepucha KR, et al. Toward the 'tipping point': decision aids and informed patient choice. Health Affairs 2007; 26(3): 716-25.
31. Perestelo-Perez L, Perez-Ramos J, Gonzalez-Lorenzo M, Rivero-Santana A, Serrano-Aguilar P. Decision aids for patients facing health treatment decisions in Spain: preliminary results. Patient Educ Couns Sep 2010; 80(3): 364-71.
32. Butow PN, Dunn SM, Tattersall MHN, Jones QJ. Patient participation in the cancer consultation: Evaluation of a question prompt sheet. Ann Oncol 1994;5: 199-204.
33. Brown R, Butow P, Boyer M, Tattersall M. Promoting patient participation in the cancer consultation: evaluation of a prompt sheet and coaching in question asking. Br J Cancer 1999; 80 (1/2): 242-8.
34. Brown RF, Butow PN, Dunn SM, Tattersall MH. Promoting patient participation and shortening cancer consultations: A randomized trial. Br J Cancer 2001;85:1273-9.
35. Bruera E, Sweeney C, Wiley Jea. Breast cancer patient perception of the helpfulness of a prompt sheet versus a general information sheet during outpatient consultation: A randomized, controlled trial. J Pain Symptom Manage 2003; 25: 412-9.
36. Rutten LJ, Arora NK, Bakos AD, Aziz N, Rowland J. Information needs and sources of information among cancer patients: A systematic review of research (1980-2003). Patient Educ Couns 2005; 57: 250-61.
37. Sepucha K, Belkora J, Aviv C, Mutchnick S, Esserman L. Improving the quality of decision making in breast cancer: Consulation planning template and consultation recording template. Oncol Nurs Forum 2003; 30(1): 99-106.
38. Belkora, J. Use of the decision dialogue process for improving the quality of medical decisions. In Proceedings of the Eleventh National Health Inforatics Conference 2003. Auckland, New Zealand. [Accessed on October 15, 2007 at http://search.infomit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=936349164604705;res=E-LIBRARY]
39. McClement SE, Hack TF. Audio-taping the oncology treatment consultation: A literature review. Patient Educ Couns 1999; 36: 229-38.
40. Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 1981; 211(4481): 453-8.
41. Mulley AG. Assessing patients' utilities: Can the ends justify the means? Med Care 1989; 27 Suppl 3: S269-81.
42. Redelmeier D, Rozin P, Kahneman D. Understanding patients' decisions: Cognitive and emotional perspectives. JAMA 1993; 270(1): 72-6.
43. Jansen S, Stiggelbout A, Wakker P, Nooij M, Noordijk E, Kievit J. Unstable preferences: A shift in valuation or an effect of the elicitation procedure? Med Decis Making. 2000; 20(1): 62-71.
44. Sepucha K., Fowler F.J., Mulley A.G. Policy support for patient-centered care: the need for measurable improvements in decision quality. Health Affairs 2004; Suppl Web Exclusive: VAR54-62.
45. Sepucha K, Ozanne E, Silvia K, Partridge A, Mulley AG, Jr. An approach to measuring the quality of breast cancer decisions. Patient Educ. Couns. 2007; 65(2): 261-9.
46. Lee C, Dominik R, Levin CA, Barry MJ, Cosenza C, O'Connor AM, et al. Development of instruments to measure the quality of breast cancer treatment decisions. Health Expect 2010; 13(3): 258-72.
47. Collins ED, Moore C, Clay K, Kearing S, OConnor AM, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Barth R, Sepucha K. Can women make an informed decision for mastectomy? J Clin Oncol 2009; 27(4):519-25. [Epub 2008 Dec 29].
48. Belkora J. Mindful collaboration: Prospect mapping as an action research approach to planning for medical consultations. Stanford: Stanford University; 1997.
49. Kinnersley P, Edwards A, Hood K, Cadbury N, Ryan R, Prout H, et al. Interventions before consultations for helping patients address their information needs. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; (3): CD004565.
50. O'Connor A, V F, DeGrasse C, Graham I, Evans W, Stacey D, et al. Decision aids for patients considering options affecting cancer outcomes: evidence of efficacy and policy implications. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1999; 25: 67-80.
51. Sepucha K, Belkora J, Mutchnick S, Esserman L. Consultation planning to help patients prepare for medical consultations: Effect on communication and satisfaction for patients and physicians. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20(11): 2695-700.
52. Sepucha K, Belkora J, Tripathy D, Esserman L. Building bridges between physicians and patients: Results of a pilot study examining new tools for collaborative decision making. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18(6):1230-8.
53. Belkora JK, Loth MK, Chen JY, Volz S, Esserman LJ. Monitoring the implementation of consultation planning, recording, and summarizing in a breast care center. Patient Educ Couns 2008; 73(3): 536-43.
54. Belkora JK, Loth MK, Volz S, Rugo HS. Implementing decision and communication aids to facilitate patient-centered care in breast cancer: A case study. Patient Educ Couns 2009; 77(3): 360-8.
55. Scott JT, Harmsen M, Prictor MJ, Entwistle VA, Sowden AJ, Watt I. Recordings or summaries of consultations for people with cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; (2): CD001539.
56. Latham CE. Is there data to support the concept that educated, empowered patients have better outcomes? J Am Soc Nephrol 1998; 9 Suppl 12: S141-S144.