The relationship between social capital, social support and the adequate use of prenatal care;A relação entre capital social e suporte social com a adequação da utilização da atenção pré-natal

Cadernos de Saude Publica

Volumn 27, Issue SUPPL.2, 2011, Pages 237-257

  do Carmo Leal, Maria ^a   Pereira, Ana Paula Esteves ^a   de Almeida Lamarca, Gabriela ^a   Vettore, Mario Vianna ^b  

^a INSTITUTO OSWALDO CRUZ   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Prenatal care; Social inequity; Social support

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAZIL; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HUMAN; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL CARE; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SOCIOECONOMICS; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADULT; BRAZIL; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL CARE; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 79960782104     PISSN: 0102311X     EISSN: 16784464     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. World Health Organization. Antenatal Care randomized trial: manual for the implementation of the new model. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002.
2. a Ed. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2000.
3. th Ed. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc; 2005.
4. Chamberlain G. Manual de assistência pré-natal. São Paulo: Livraria Santos Editora; 1993.
5. Lin YH, Tsai EM, Chan T F, Chou FH, Lin YL. Health Promoting Lifestyles and Related Factors in Pregnant Women. Chang Gung Med J 2009; 32:650-661.
6. a Ed. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2006. (Série A. Normas e Manuais Técnicos).
7. Szwarcwald CL, Mendonça MHM, Andrade CLT. Indicadores de atenção básica em quatro municí-pios do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, 2005: resultados de inquérito domiciliar de base populacional. Ciênc Saúde coletiva 2006 11:643-655.
8. Leal MC, Gama SG, Ratto KM, Cunha CB. Uso do índice de Kotelchuck modificado na avaliação da assistência pré-natal e sua relação com as car-acterísticas maternas e o peso do recém-nascido no Município do Rio de Janeiro. Cad Saúde Pública 2004; 20 Suppl 1:S63-S72.
9. Coimbra LC, Silva AA, Mochel EG, Alves MT, Ri-beiro VS, Aragão VM, et al. Factors associated with inadequacy of prenatal care utilization. Rev Saúde Pública 2003; 37:456-62.
10. Bassani DG, Surkan PJ, Olinto MT. Inadequate use of prenatal services among Brazilian women: the role of maternal characteristics. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2009; 35:15-20.
11. Kawachi I, Subramanian S V, Kim D. Social capital and health. New York: Springer; 2008.
12. Bourdieu P. The forms of social capital. In: Richardson JG, editor. Handbook of theory and research for sociology of education. New York: Greenwood Press; 1986. p. 241-8.
13. Putnam RD. Making democracy work: civic traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1993.
14. Subramanian S V, Lochner KA, Kawachi I. Neighborhood differences in social capital: a compositional artifact or a contextual construct? Health Place 2003; 9:33-44.
15. Macintyre S, Ellaway A. 2000. Ecological approaches: rediscovering the role of the physical and social environment. In: Berkman L F, Kawachi I, editors. Social epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000. p. 332-348.
16. Berkman LF, Kawachi I. Social epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000.
17. Lia-Hoagberg B, Schaffer M, Strohschein S. Public health nursing practice guidelines: an evaluation of dissemination and use. Public Health Nurs 1999; 16:397-404.
18. Quelopana AM, Champion JD, Salazar BC. Factors predicting the initiation of prenatal care in Mexican women. Midwifery 2009; 25:277-285.
19. st Ed. London: Penguin Group; 2009.
20. Kotelchuck M. An evaluation of Kessner adequacy of prenantal care index and a proposed adequacy prenantal care utilization index. Am J Public Health 1994; 84:1414-20.
21. Woolcock M, Narayan D. Social capital: implications for development theory, research and policy. The World Bank Research Observer 2000; 15: 225-249.
22. Pattussi M P. Neighbourhood social capital and oral health in adolescents [Doctoral Dissertation]. London: University College London; 2004.
23. Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW, Earls F. Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science 1997; 277:918-924.
24. Miles-doan R. "Empowering" women. Network 1994; 15:14-16.
25. Muntaner C, Oates GL, Lynch JW. Social class and social cohesion: a content validity analysis using a nonrecursive structural equation model. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1999; 896:409-13.
26. Kennedy B P, Kawachi I, Prothrow-Stith D, Lochner K, Gupta V. Social capital, income inequality, and firearm violent crime. Soc Sci Med 1998; 47:7-17.
27. Caplan G. Support systems and community mental health. New York: Behavioral Publications; 1974.
28. Berkman L F, Syme SL. Social networks, host resistance, and mortality: a nine-year follow-up study of Alameda County residents. Am J Epidemiol 1979; 109:186-204.
29. Sherbourne CD, Stewart AL. The MOS social support survey. Soc Sci Med 1991; 38:705-714.
30. Griep RH, Chor D, Faerstein E, Lopes C. Apoio social: confiabilidade teste-reteste de escala no Estu-do Pró-Saúde. Cad Saúde Pública 2003; 19:625-634.
31. Chor D, Griep RH, Lopes C, Faerstein, E. Medidas de rede e apoio social no Estudo Pró-Saúde: pré-testes e estudo piloto. Cad Saúde Pública 2001; 17:887-896.
32. Associação Nacional de Empresas de Pesquisa. Critério de classificação econômica no Brasil. São Paulo: Associação Nacional de Empresas de Pes-quisa; 1997.
33. Poortinga W. Social capital: an individual or collective resource for health? Soc Sci Med 2006; 62:292-302.
34. Hendryx MS, Ahern MM, Lovrich N P, McCurdy AH. Access to health care and community social capital. Health Serv Res 2002; 37:87-103.
35. Leal MC, Gama SGN, Frias P, Szwarcwald CL. Healthy lifestyles and access to periodic health exams among Brazilian women. Cad Saúde Pública 2005; 21 Suppl:S78-S88.
36. Lima-Costa M F, Matos DL. Prevalência e fatores associados à realização da amografia na faixa etária de 50-69 anos: um estudo baseado na Pes-quisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios (2003). Cad Saúde Pública 2007; 23:1665-1673.
37. St Clair PA, Smeriglio VL, Alexander CS, Celentano DD. Social network structure and prenatal care utilization. Med Care 1989; 27:823-832.
38. Fukuyama F. Trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press; 1995.
39. Marin A, Piccinini CA. Famílias uniparentais: a mãe solteira na literature. Psico (Porto Alegre) 2009; 40:422-429.