Invited commentary: Consolidating data harmonization - How to obtain quality and applicability?

American Journal of Epidemiology

Volumn 174, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 261-264

  Fortier, Isabel ^a,b   Doiron, Dany ^a,c,d   Burton, Paul ^a   Raina, Parminder ^e  

^a Public Population Project in Genomics P3G   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

^e MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

data collection; epidemiologic methods; genome wide association study; meta analysis as topic; research design; risk factors

Indexed keywords

DATA ACQUISITION; DATA PROCESSING; DATA QUALITY; DISEASE INCIDENCE; DISEASE SEVERITY; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; EPIDEMIOLOGY; GENOMICS; HEALTH RISK; LIFESTYLE; MEDICAL GEOGRAPHY; META-ANALYSIS; PHENOTYPE; RESEARCH METHOD; RISK FACTOR; SAMPLING;

DATA ANALYSIS; DATA EXTRACTION; DATA SYNTHESIS; EPIDEMIOLOGICAL DATA; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PHENOTYPE; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR;

GENOMICS; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; PHENOTYPE; REFERENCE STANDARDS;

EID: 79960753480     PISSN: 00029262     EISSN: 14766256     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwr194     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Hamilton CM, Strader LC, Pratt JG, et al. The PhenX Toolkit: get the most from your measures. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173(4):253-260.
2. Burton PR, Hansell AL, Fortier I, et al. Size matters: just how big is BIG? Quantifying realistic sample size requirements for human genome epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol. 2009;38(1): 263-273.
3. Manolio TA, Bailey-Wilson JE, Collins FS. Genes, environment and the value of prospective cohort studies. Nat Rev Genet. 2006;7(10):812-820. (Pubitemid 44413225)
4. Hunter DJ. Gene-environment interactions in human diseases. Nat Rev Genet. 2005;6(4):287-298. (Pubitemid 40469048)
5. Khoury MJ, Millikan R, Little J, et al. The emergence of epidemiology in the genomics age. Int J Epidemiol. 2004; 33(5):936-944. (Pubitemid 39429983)
6. Thompson A. Thinking big: large-scale collaborative research in observational epidemiology. Eur J Epidemiol. 2009;24(12):727-731.
7. Slimani N, Deharveng G, Charrondière RU, et al. Structure of the standardized computerized 24-h diet recall interview used as reference method in the 22 centers participating in the EPIC project. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1999; 58(3):251-266. (Pubitemid 29074674)
8. Kaaks R, Slimani N, Riboli E. Pilot phase studies on the accuracy of dietary intake measurements in the EPIC project: overall evaluation of results. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Int J Epidemiol. 1997;26(suppl 1):S26-S36. (Pubitemid 27129687)
9. Pols MA, Peeters PH, Ocké MC, et al. Estimation of reproducibility and relative validity of the questions included in the EPIC Physical Activity Questionnaire. Int J Epidemiol. 1997;26(suppl 1):S181-S189. (Pubitemid 27129702)
10. Granda P, Blasczyk E. Data Harmonization: Guidelines for Best Practice in Cross-Cultural Surveys. Ann Arbor, MI: Survey Research Centre, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan; 2010.
11. Granda P, Wolf C, Hadorn R. Harmonizing survey data. In: Harkness JA, Braun M, Edwards B, et al. Survey Methods in Multinational, Multiregional, and Multicultural Contexts. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2010:315-332.
12. Institute for Statistics, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. International Standard Classification of Education-ISCED. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: UNESCO Institute for Statistics; 2010. (www.uis . unesco.org/isced). (Accessed November 17, 2010).
13. International Labour Organization, United Nations. ISCO-International Standard Classification of Occupations. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Organization; 2010. ( index.htm). (Accessed October 20, 2010).
14. Olsen J. Epidemiology deserves better questionnaires. IEA European Questionnaire Group. Int J Epidemiol. 1998;27(6): 935. (Pubitemid 29026739)
15. Fortier I, Burton PR, Robson PJ, et al. Quality, quantity and harmony: the DataSHaPER approach to integrating data across bioclinical studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39(5): 1383-1393.
16. Borugian MJ, Robson P, Fortier I, et al. The Canadian Partnership for Tomorrow Project: building a pan-Canadian research platform for disease prevention. CMAJ. 2010; 182(11):1197-1201.
17. Riboli E, Kaaks R. The EPIC Project: rationale and study design. European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Int J Epidemiol. 1997;26(suppl 1):S6-S14. (Pubitemid 27129685)
18. Beer-Borst S, Morabia A, Hercberg S, et al. Obesity and other health determinants across Europe: the EURALIM project. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000;54(6): 424-430. (Pubitemid 30312518)
19. Esteve A, Sobek M. Challenges and methods of international census harmonization. Hist Method. 2003;36(2): 66-79. (Pubitemid 36997041)
20. Fortier I, Doiron D, Little J, et al. Is rigorous retrospective harmonization possible? Application of the DataSHaPER approach across 53 large studies. Int J Epidemiol. In press.