Detecting speculative language using syntactic dependencies and logistic regression

CoNLL-2010: Shared Task - Fourteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, Proceedings of the Shared Task

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 18-25

  Vlachos, Andreas ^a   Craven, Mark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL TEXT; CLASSIFICATION TASKS; F-SCORE; LOGISTIC REGRESSION CLASSIFIER; LOGISTIC REGRESSIONS; SEMANTIC CONTENT; SYNTACTIC FEATURES; UNCERTAIN INFORMATIONS;

LOGISTICS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; SEMANTICS;

SYNTACTICS;

EID: 79960748455     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Jinying Chen and Martha Palmer. 2009. Improving English Verb Sense Disambiguation Performance with Linguistically Motivated Features and Clear Sense Distinction Boundaries. Language Resources and Evaluation, 43(2):143-172.
2. Marie-Catherine de Marneffe and Christopher D. Manning. 2008. The Stanford typed dependencies representation. In CrossParser'08: Coling 2008: Proceedings of the Workshop on Cross-Framework and Cross-Domain Parser Evaluation, pages 1-8.
3. Richárd Farkas, Veronika Vincze, György Móra, János Csirik, and György Szarvas. 2010. The CoNLL-2010 Shared Task: Learning to Detect Hedges and their Scope in Natural Language Text. In Proceedings of CoNLL-2010 Shared Task, pages 1-12.
4. Alexander Genkin, David D. Lewis, and David Madigan. 2006. Large-scale Bayesian Logistic Regression for Text Classification. Technometrics, 49(3):291-304.
5. Ken Hyland. 1996. Writing Without Conviction? Hedging in Science Research Articles. Applied Linguistics, 17(4):433-454.
6. Halil Kilicoglu and Sabine Bergler. 2008. Recognizing speculative language in biomedical research articles: a linguistically motivated perspective. In BioNLP'08: Proceedings of the Workshop on Current Trends in Biomedical Natural Language Processing, pages 46-53.
7. Jin-Dong Kim, Tomoko Ohta, Sampo Pyysalo, Yoshinobu Kano, and Jun'ichi Tsujii. 2009. Overview of BioNLP'09 shared task on event extraction. In BioNLP '09: Proceedings of the Workshop on BioNLP, pages 1-9.
8. Marc Light, Xin Ying Qiu, and Padmini Srinivasan. 2004. The Language of Bioscience: Facts, Speculations, and Statements In Between. In HLT-NAACL 2004 Workshop: BioLINK 2004, Linking Biological Literature, Ontologies and Databases, pages 17-24.
9. Ben Medlock and Ted Briscoe. 2007. Weakly Supervised Learning for Hedge Classification in Scientific Literature. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, pages 992-999.
10. Guido Minnen, John Carroll, and Darren Pearce. 2001. Applied morphological processing of English. Natural Language Engineering, 7(3):207-223.
11. Laura Rimell and Stephen Clark. 2009. Porting a lexicalized-grammar parser to the biomedical domain. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 42(5):852-865.
12. György Szarvas, Veronika Vincze, Richárd Farkas, and János Csirik. 2008. The BioScope corpus: annotation for negation, uncertainty and their scope in biomedical texts. In BioNLP'08: Proceedings of the Workshop on Current Trends in Biomedical Natural Language Processing, pages 38-45.
13. Theresa Ann Wilson. 2008. Fine-grained Subjectivity and Sentiment Analysis: Recognizing the Intensity, Polarity, and Attitudes of Private States. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pittsburgh.