Export orientation and domestic electricity generation: Effects on energy efficiency innovation in select sectors

Energy Policy

Volumn 39, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 5638-5646

  Urpelainen, Johannes ^a  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

Electricity generation; Energy efficiency; Technology innovation

Indexed keywords

DOMESTIC DEMAND; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; GLOBAL MARKET; HYDROPOWER PLANTS; INTERACTIVE EFFECT; OECD COUNTRIES; POSITIVE EFFECTS; TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION; VARIABLE COSTS;

COST ACCOUNTING; ELECTRIC GENERATORS; ELECTRICITY; HYDROELECTRIC POWER; INNOVATION; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; PATENTS AND INVENTIONS; USER INTERFACES;

ENERGY EFFICIENCY;

COMMERCIALIZATION; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; ELECTRICITY SUPPLY; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; EXPORT; HYDROELECTRIC POWER; INCENTIVE; INNOVATION; NUCLEAR POWER;

EID: 79960739290     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.04.028     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ahman M. Government policy and the development of electric vehicles in Japan. Energy Policy 2006, 34(4):433-443.
2. Archibugi D., Pianta M. Measuring technological change through patents and innovation surveys. Technovation 1996, 16(9):451-468.
3. Arthur W.B. Competing technologies, increasing returns and lock-in by historical events. Economic Journal 1989, 99(1):106-131.
4. Barrett S. The coming global climate-technology revolution. Journal of Economic Perspectives 2009, 23(2):53-75.
5. Basberg B.L. Patents and the measurement of technological change: a survey of the literature. Research Policy 1987, 16(2-4):131-141.
6. Brambor T., Clark W.R., Golder M. Understanding interaction models: improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis 2006, 14(1):63-82.
7. Costantini V., Crespi F. Environmental regulation and the export dynamics of energy technologies. Ecological Economics 2008, 66(2-3):447-460.
8. DeCanio S.J. The efficiency paradox: bureaucratic and organizational barriers to profitable energy-saving investments. Energy Policy 1998, 26(5):441-454.
9. Driscoll J., Kraay A. Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially-dependent panel data. Review of Economics and Statistics 1998, 80(4):549-560.
10. Fredriksson P.G., Vollebergh H.R.J., Dijkgraaf E. Corruption and energy efficiency in OECD countries: theory and evidence. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2004, 47(2):207-231.
11. Furman J.L., Porter M.E., Stern S. The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy 2002, 31(6):899-933.
12. Gallagher K.S., Holdren J.P., Sagar A.D. Energy-technology innovation. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 2006, 31:193-237.
13. Geller H., Harrington P., Rosenfeld A.H., Tanishima S., Unander F. Policies for increasing energy efficiency: thirty years of experience in OECD countries. Energy Policy 2006, 34(5):556-573.
14. Heymann M. Signs of Hubris: The shaping of wind technology styles in Germany, Denmark, and the United States, 1940-1990. Technology and Culture 1998, 39(4):641-670.
15. Huber J. Pioneer countries and the global diffusion of environmental innovations: theses from the viewpoint of ecological modernisation theory. Global Environmental Change 2008, 18(3):360-367.
16. Ikenberry G.J. The irony of state strength: comparative responses to the oil shocks in the 1970s. International Organization 1986, 40(1):105-137.
17. Jacobsson S., Bergek A. Transforming the energy sector: the evolution of technological systems in renewable energy technology. Industrial and Corporate Change 2004, 13(5):815-849.
18. Jaffe A.B., Stavins R.N. The energy-efficiency gap. Energy Policy 1994, 22(10):804-810.
19. Johnstone N., Hascic I., Popp D. Renewable energy policies and technological innovation: evidence based on patent counts. Environmental and Resource Economics 2010, 45(1):133-155.
20. Lanjouw J.O., Mody A. Innovation and the international diffusion of environmentally responsive technology. Research Policy 1996, 25(4):549-571.
21. Lewis J.I., Wiser R.H. Fostering a renewable energy technology industry: an international comparison of wind industry policy support mechanisms. Energy Policy 2007, 35(3):1844-1857.
22. Lipp J. Lessons for effective renewable electricity policy from Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom. Energy Policy 2007, 35(11):5481-5495.
23. Lund P.D. Effects of energy policies on industry expansion in renewable energy. Renewable Energy 2009, 34(1):53-64.
24. Luukkanen J. Green paper with green electricity? Greening strategies of Nordic pulp and paper industry. Energy Policy 2003, 31(7):641-655.
25. Nelson, R.R. (Ed.), 1993. National Innovation Systems. Oxford University Press, New York.
26. Neuhoff K. Large-scale deployment of renewables for electricity generation. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 2005, 21(1):88-110.
27. Newell R.G., Jaffe A.B., Stavins R.N. The induced innovation hypothesis and energy-saving technological change. Quarterly Journal of Economics 1999, 114(3):941-975.
28. Ostry S., Nelson R.R. Techno-Nationalism and Techno-Globalism: Conflict and Cooperation 1995, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC.
29. Popp D. Induced innovation and energy prices. American Economic Review 2002, 92(1):160-180.
30. Porter M.E., van der Linde C. Green and competitive: ending the stalemate. Harvard Business Review 1995, 73:120-134.
31. Sandholtz W. High-Tech Europe: The Politics of International Cooperation 1992, University of California Press, Berkeley.
32. Sorrell S. Jevons' paradox revisited: the evidence for backfire from improved energy efficiency. Energy Policy 2009, 37(4):1456-1469.
33. Szarka J. Why is there no wind rush in France?. European Environment 2007, 17(5):321-333.
34. Watanabe C., Wakabayashi K., Miyazawa T. Industrial dynamism and the creation of a 'Virtuous Cycle' between R&D, market growth and price reduction: the case of photovoltaic power generation (PV) development in Japan. Technovation 2000, 20(6):299-312.