Re: Comparative effectiveness of prostate cancer treatments: Evaluating statistical adjustments for confounding in observational data

Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Volumn 103, Issue 14, 2011, Pages 1134-1135

  Hadley, Jack ^a   Barrett, Michael J ^b   Penson, David F ^c   Saigal, Christopher S ^d   Potosky, Arnold L ^e  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC   (United States)

^c VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HAZARD RATIO; INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE ANALYSIS; LETTER; MORTALITY; OBSERVER BIAS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPENSITY SCORE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 79960725396     PISSN: 00278874     EISSN: 14602105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djr217     Document Type: Letter

References (3)

1. Wooldridge J. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 2002.
2. Hadley J, Yabroff KR, Barrett MJ, Penson DF, Saigal CS, Potosky AL. Comparative effectiveness of prostate cancer treatments: evaluating statistical adjustments for confounding in observational data. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102(23):1780-1793.
3. Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Filen F, et al.; for the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group Study Number 4. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in localized prostate cancer: the Scandinavian prostate cancer group-4 randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100(16):1144-1154.