Cultivating the climate: Socio-economic prospects and consequences of climate-friendly peat land management in Germany

Hydrobiologia

Volumn 674, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 91-104

  Schaller, Lena ^a   Kantelhardt, Jochen ^a   Drösler, Matthias ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND LIFE SCIENCES   (Austria)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Agricultural peat land use; Economic consequences; Farm survey; Reduction of greenhouse gases

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL LAND; AGRICULTURAL MANAGEMENT; AGRICULTURAL SOIL; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; COMPENSATION SYSTEM; CULTIVATION; DRAWDOWN; ECONOMIC IMPACT; FARM; GREENHOUSE GAS; LAND MANAGEMENT; PEAT SOIL; PEATLAND; PROFITABILITY; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACT; SOIL CARBON; SOIL DEGRADATION; SOIL MANAGEMENT; STAKEHOLDER; SUSTAINABILITY; TRACE GAS; WATER LEVEL; WATER TABLE; WATERLOGGING;

GERMANY;

EID: 79960719728     PISSN: 00188158     EISSN: 15735117     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-011-0736-y     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Augustin, J., 2003. Einfluss des Grundwasserstandes auf die Emission von klimarelevanten Spurengasen und die C- und N-Umsetzungsprozesse in nordostdeutschen Niedermooren. In Stoffausträge aus wiedervernässten Niedermooren: Fachbeiträge auf einem wissenschaftlichen Kolloquium in Güstrow am 25. Februar 2002. Landesamt für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Geologie Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Güstrow: 38-54.
2. Bryson, J. M., 2004. What to do when stakeholders matter: a guide to stakeholder identification and analysis techniques. Public Management Review 6: 21-53.
3. Bundesministerium der Justiz, 2007. Verordnung über die Anwendung von Düngemitteln, Bodenhilfsstoffen, Kultursubstraten und Pflanzenhilfsmitteln nach den Grundsätzen der guten fachlichen Praxis (Düngeverordnung - DüV). [29. 12. 2010, available at: http://bundesrecht. juris. de/bundesrecht/d_v/gesamt. pdf].
4. Byrne, K. A., B. Chojnicki, T. R. Christensen, M. Drösler, & A. Freibauer, 2004. EU peat lands: current carbon stocks and trace gas fluxes. CarboEurope-GHG Concerted Action - Synthesis of the European Greenhouse Gas Budget, Report 4/2004, Specific Study, Tipo-Lito Recchioni, Viterbo.
5. Drösler, M., 2005. Trace gas exchange and climatic relevance of bog ecosystems, Southern Germany. Dissertation an der Technischen Universität München, published online: urn: nbn: de: bvb: 91-diss20050901-12494310.
6. Drösler, M., A. Freibauer, T. R. Christensen, & T. Friborg, 2008. Observations and status of peat land greenhouse gas emissions in Europe. In Dolman, A. J., R. Valentini & A. Freibauer (eds), Observations and Status of Peat land Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Europe, Ecological Studies 203: The Continental-Scale Greenhouse Gas Balance of Europe, New York: 243-261.
7. Hübner, R., J. Kantelhardt & L. Schaller, 2008. Climate protection - land use in peat-land areas: network analysis as a method for actors and systems analysis. In Daub, C.-H., P. Burger & Y. Scherrer (eds), Creating Values for Sustainable Development - Proceedings of the 2nd International Sustainability Conference, 21-22 August, Basel, Schweiz.
8. Joosten, H. & D. Clarke, 2002. Wise Use of Mires and Peat lands - Background and Principles Including a Framework for Decision Making. International Mire Conservation Group and International Peat Society, Finland.
9. Kantelhardt, J. & H. Hoffmann, 2001. Ökonomische Beurteilung landschaftsökologischer Auflagen für die Landwirtschaft - dargestellt am Beispiel Donauried. In Berichte über Landwirtschaft 3/2001, Germany: 415-436.
10. Kasimir-Klemedtsson, A., L. Klemedtsson, K. Berglund, P. Martikainen, J. Silvola & O. Oenema, 1997. Greenhouse gas emissions from farmed organic soils: a review. Soil Use and Management 13: 229-304 (54 ref.); 245-250.
11. Limpens, J., F. Berendse1, C. Blodau, J. G. Canadell, C. Freeman, J. Holden, N. Roulet, H. Rydin & G. Schaepman-Strub1, 2008. Peat lands and the carbon cycle: from local processes to global implications - a synthesis. Biogeosciences 5: 1475-1491.
12. MPA, 2004. Stakeholder Participation: A Synthesis of Current Literature. Published online by the National Marine Protected Areas Center in cooperation with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Coastal Services Center. [29. 12. 2010, available at http://www. mpa. gov/pdf/publications/Stakeholder_Synthesis. pdf].
13. NIR, 2010. Berichterstattung unter der Klimarahmenkonvention der Vereinten Nationen 2010. Nationaler Inventarbericht Zum Deutschen Treibhausgasinventar 1990-2008, Umweltbundesamt. EU-Submission, [16. 06. 2010, available at http://cdr. eionet. europa. eu/de/eu/ghgmm/envs08l9q/DE_NIR_2010_EU_Submission_de. pdf].
14. Nutt, P., 2002. Why Decisions Fail: Avoiding the Blunders and Traps That Lead to Debacles. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco.
15. Pfadenhauer, J. & M. Droesler, 2005. Project submission "Climate change mitigation via peat land conservation", unpublished.
16. Post, W. M., W. R. Emanuel, P. J. Zinke & A. G. Stangenberger, 1982. Soil carbon pools and world life zones. Nature 298: 156-159.
17. Turaga, R. M. R., 2001. Public Participation in Environmental Decision Making: What Process Factors Affect Acceptability of Decisions? School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.
18. Turunen, J., E. Tomppo, K. Tolonen & A. Reinikainen, 2002. Estimating carbon accumulation rates of undrained mires in Finland - application to boreal and subarctic regions. The Holocene 12: 69-80.
19. Vogel, T., 2002. Nutzung und Schutz von Niedermooren: empirische Untersuchung und ökonomische Bewertung für Brandenburg und Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. Der Andere Verlag, Osnabrück.
20. Webler, T., S. Tuler & R. Krueger, 2001. What is a good public participation process? Five perspectives from the public. Environmental Management 27: 435-450.