Ancillary benefits of climate policy in a small open economy: The case of Sweden

Energy Policy

Volumn 39, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 4985-4998

  Krook Riekkola, Anna ^a,c   Ahlgren, Erik O ^a   Söderholm, Patrik ^b  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b LULEÅ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^c TNO   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Ancillary benefits; Climate policy; Swedish energy system

Indexed keywords

ANCILLARY BENEFITS; CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; CLIMATE POLICY; EMISSION REDUCTION; ENERGY SYSTEMS; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANTS; FUEL CHOICES; INHALABLE PARTICLES; NON-METHANE VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; OPTIMISATIONS; SYSTEM COSTS;

CARBON DIOXIDE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EMISSION CONTROL; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; GLOBAL WARMING; METHANE; NITRIC OXIDE; NITROGEN OXIDES; ORGANIC POLLUTANTS; SULFUR; SULFUR DIOXIDE; VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS;

GREENHOUSE GASES;

ECONOMIC IMPACT; EMISSION CONTROL; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; GREENHOUSE GAS; NITROGEN OXIDES; POLICY DEVELOPMENT; POLLUTION POLICY; SULFUR DIOXIDE; VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND;

SWEDEN;

EID: 79960719317     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.06.015     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Azar C., Sterner T. Discounting and distributional considerations in the context of global warming. Ecological Economics 1996, 19(2):169-184.
2. Boström, C.-Å., Flodström, E., Cooper, D., 2004. Emissionsfaktorer för Stationär Förbränning (Emission Factors in Stationary Combustion). Report nr 3-2004, Swedish Environmental Emissions Data (SMED).
3. Boyd R., Krutilla K., Viscusi W.K. Energy taxation as a policy instrument to reduce CO2 emissions: a net benefit analysis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1985, 29:1-24.
4. Burtraw D., Krupnick A., Palmer K., Paul A., Toman M., Bloyd C. Ancillary benefits of reducing air pollution in the US from moderate greenhouse gas mitigation policies in the electricity sector. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2003, 45(3):650-673.
5. Bye B., Kverndokk S., Rosendahl K.E. Mitigation costs, distributional effects and ancillary benefits of carbon policies in the Nordic countries, the UK and Ireland: a survey of model results. Mitigation and Adaption Strategies for Global Change 2002, 7:339-366.
6. Carlén, B., 2004. EU's Emissions Trading System in the Presence of National Emission Target. Working Paper 2004:16, Department of Economics, Stockholm University.
7. Das A., Rossetti di Valdalbero D., Virdis M.R. ACROPOLIS: an example of international collaboration in the field of energy modelling to support greenhouse gases mitigation policies. Energy Policy 2007, 35(2):763-771.
8. Davis, D.L., Krupnick, A., McGlynn, G., 2000. Ancillary benefits and costs of greenhouse gas mitigation-an overview. Paper presented at the IPCC Expert Workshop on Assessing the Ancillary Benefits and Costs of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Policies, Washington, DC, March 27-29.
9. Ekins P. The secondary benefits of CO2 abatement: how much emission reduction do they justify?. Ecological Economics 1996, 16(1):3-24.
10. Elforsk, 2007. El Från Nya Anläggningar 2007. Elforsk Report 07:50, Stockholm.
11. European Climate Exchange (ECX), 2009. Prices and Volume: ECX EUA Futures Contract (22 April 2005-17 March 2009). Internet: http://www.ecx.eu/EUA-Futures.
12. Garqiulo, M., 2008. RES 2020. The modeling approach in RES2020 and the data used for the potential of renewable energy sources in EU27. Presentation at the RES2020 International Workshop, 10-11 November, Prague. Internet: http://www.res2020.eu.
13. Government Bill 2008/09:162. En sammanhållen klimat-och energipolitik-klimat, Ministry of the Environment, Government of Sweden, Stockholm.
14. Government Offices of Sweden, 2009. A Sustainable Energy and Climate Policy for the Environment. Competitiveness and Long-term Stability, Swedish Prime Minister's Office, Internet: http://www.sweden.gov.se/sb/d/2031/a/120088.
15. Holland, M., Watkiss, P., 2007. Benefits Table Database: Estimates of the Marginal External Costs of Air Pollution in Europe. Version E1.02a.
16. Hourcade, J.-C., Shukla, P.R., Cifuentes, L., Davis D., Emonds, J., Fisher, B., Fortin, E., Golub, A., Hohmeyer, O., Krupnick, A., Kverndokk, S., Loulou, R., Richels, R., Segenovic, H., Yamaji, K., 2001. Global, Regional, and National Costs and Ancillary benefits of Mitigation. Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Third Assessment Report (TAR). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 499-559.
17. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2007. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva.
18. Kågeson, P., 2007. Miljöbilar och Biodrivmedel-Hur Påverkas Sverige av EU:s Direktiv? Vinnova Report VR 2007:10, Stockholm.
19. Klaassen G., Riahi K. Internalizing externalities of electricity generation: an analysis with MESSAGE-MACRO. Energy Policy 2007, 35(2):815-827.
20. Krook Riekkola, A., Ahlgren, E., 2003. Externaliteter-En Analys utifrån EU:s ExternE-Resultat. Nordleden 2003. Slutrapport för Etapp 2, Profu i Göteborg AB, Gothenburg, Sweden.
21. Kuosmanen T., Bijsterbosch N., Dellink R. Environmental cost-benefit analysis of alternative timing strategies in greenhouse gas abatement: a data envelopment analysis approach. Ecological Economics 2009, 68(6):1633-1642.
22. Loulou, R., Remne, U., Kanudia, A., Lehtila, A., Goldstein, G., 2005. Documentation for the TIMES Model-PART I, Internet: http://www.etsap.org/documentation.asp.
23. Morgenstern, R.D., 2000. Baseline issues in the estimation of the ancillary benefits of greenhouse gas mitigation policies. Paper presented at the IPCC Expert Workshop on Assessing the Ancillary Benefits and Costs of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Policies, Washington, DC.
24. Nilsson C., Huthala A. Is CO2-Trading Always Beneficial? A CGE-model Ana-lysis on Secondary Environmental Benefits, Working Paper 2000, National Institute of Economic Research, Stockholm.
25. Nordel, 2008. Annual Statistics 2007. Nordel's Statistics Report, Internet: http://www.entsoe.eu/resources/publications/nordic/annualstatistics/.
26. OECD, 2002. Ancillary Benefits and Costs of GHG Mitigation: Policy Conclusions, ENV/EPOC/GSP(2001)13/FINAL, Paris.
27. Östblom, G., Samakovlis, E., 2004. Cost of Climate Policy when Pollution Affects Health and Labour Productivity: A General Equilibrium Analysis Applied to Sweden. Working Paper No. 93, Swedish National Institute of Economic Research.
28. Östblom G., Samakovlis E. Linking health and productivity impacts to climate policy costs: a general equilibrium analysis. Climate Policy 2007, 7(5):379-391.
29. Pettersson F., Söderholm P. The diffusion of renewable electricity in the presence of climate policy and technology learning: the case of Sweden. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2009, 13(8):2031-2040.
30. Repetto R., Austin D. The Costs of Climate Protection: A Guide for the Perplexed 1997, World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.
31. RES2020, 2009. EU27 Synthesis Report. The European Commission's Research Program: Intelligent Energy. Project no: EIE/06/170/SI2.442662. Deliverable D.4.2. Internet: http://www.res2020.eu.
32. Söderholm P., Pettersson F. Climate policy and the social cost of power generation: impacts of the Swedish national emissions target. Energy Policy 2008, 36(11):4154-4158.
33. Statistics Sweden, 2007. Electric Supply, District Heating and Supply of Natural and Gasworks Gas 2005. Statistical Report EN11SM0701, Stockholm.
34. Statistics Sweden, 2008. Statistical Data of Air Borne Emissions by Sector. Internet: http://www.scb.se.
35. Stern N. The Economics of Climate Change, The Stern Review 2006, Oxford University Press.
36. Swedish Energy Agency, 2006. Energy in Sweden Facts and Figures 2006. Internet: http://www.swedishenergyagency.se.
37. Swedish Energy Agency, 2007. The Electricity Certificate System 2007. ID-No ET2007:27. Internet: http://www.swedishenergyagency.se.
38. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, 2008. Förslag till ny Förordning om Miljö-Kvalitetsnormerna för Utomhusluft (Proposal for New Regulation of Environmental Standards for Outdoor Air Quality). Report 5884, Stockholm.
39. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, 2009. Thermal Values and Emission Factors Energy CLRTAP sub2009. Appendix 2 to National Inventory Report 2009 Sweden, Stockholm. Internet: http://www.naturvardsverket.se/sv/Tillstandet-i-miljon/Utslappsdata.
40. Swedish Institute for Transport and Communications Analysis (SIKA), 2002. Figures Underlying Economic Calculations (Övergripande kalkylparametrar). Report 2002:7. Internet: http://www.sika-institute.se.
41. Swedish Tax Agency, 2008a. Tax Rates in 2009 (Skattesatser 2009). Internet: http://www.skatteverket.se.
42. Swedish Tax Agency, 2008b. Selective Purchase Taxes, SKV 505 Edition 21 (Punktskatter, SKV 505 utgåva 21). Internet: http://www.skatteverket.se.
43. Van Vuuren D.P., Cofala J., Eerens H.E., Oostenrijk R., Heyes C., Klimont Z., den Elzen M.G.J., Amann M. Exploring the ancillary benefits of the Kyoto protocol for air pollution in Europe. Energy Policy 2006, 34(4):444-460.