Assessment of endangered synanthropic plants of hungary with special attention to arable weeds

Plant Biosystems

Volumn 145, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 426-435

  Pinke, G ^a   Kiraly G ^a   Barina, Z ^b   Mesterhazy A ^a   Balogh, L ^c   Csiky, J ^d   Schmotzer, A ^e   MolnaR A V ^f   Pal R W ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WEST HUNGARY   (Hungary)

^b DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY   (Hungary)

^c Savaria Museum   (Hungary)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PÉCS   (Hungary)

^e Bukki Nemzeti Park   (Hungary)

^f UNIVERSITY OF DEBRECEN   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Arable plants; Biodiversity; Conservation; Rare weeds; Red list; Weed flora

Indexed keywords

AMARANTHACEAE; AMBROSIA ARTEMISIIFOLIA; ASTERACEAE; BRASSICACEAE; CARYOPHYLLACEAE; FABACEAE; POACEAE; SCROPHULARIACEAE;

EID: 79960684160     PISSN: 11263504     EISSN: 17245575     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/11263504.2011.563534     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Aavik T, Liira J. 2009. Agrotolerant and high nature-value species-Plant biodiversity indicator groups in agroecosystems. Ecol Indicat 9: 892-901.
2. Albrecht H. 2003. Suitability of arable weeds as indicator organism to evaluate species conservation effects of management in agricultural ecosystems. Agr Ecosyst Environ 98: 201-211.
3. Andreasen C, Stryhn H. 2008. Increasing weed flora in Danish arable fields and its importance for biodiversity. Weed Res 48: 1-9.
4. Balogh L. 2010. Archaeophytes in the flora of Hungary - A preliminary list. Manuscript. Szombathely: Savaria Museum.
5. Balogh L, Dancza I, Király G. 2004. A magyarországi neofitonok id}oszer jegyzéke és besorolásuk invázió s szempontbó l [Actual list of neophytes in Hungary and their classification according to their success]. In: Mihály B, Botta-Dukát Z, editors. Özönnövények [Invasive plants]. Budapest, Hungary: Termé-szetbú vár Alapi{dotless}́tvány Kiadó. pp. 61-92.
6. Barberi P, Burgio G, Dinelli G, Moonen AC, Otto S, Vazzana C, et al. 2010. Functional biodiversity in the agricultural landscape: Relationships between weeds and arthropod fauna. Weed Res 50: 388-401.
7. Billeter R, Liira J, Bailey R, Bugter R, Arens P, Augenstein I, et al. 2008. Indicators for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: A pan-European study. J Appl Ecol 45: 141-150.
8. Brun C. 2009. Biodiversity changes in highly anthropogenic environments (cultivated and ruderal) since the Neolithic in eastern France. Holocene 19: 861-871.
9. Celesti-Grapow L, Alessandrini A, Arrigoni P, Assini S, Banfi E, Barni E, et al. 2010. Non-native flora of Italy: Species distribution and threats. Plant Biosyst 143: 12-28.
10. Celesti-Grapow L, Alessandrini A, Arrigoni P, Banfi E, Bernardo L, Bovio M, et al. 2009. Inventory of the non-native flora of Italy. Plant Biosyst 143: 386-430.
11. Donald PF, Green RE, Heath MF. 2001. Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe's farmland bird populations. Proc Roy Soc Lond B Biol Sci 268: 25-29.
12. Eliáš P, Eliáš P, Baranec T. 2005. The new Red List of Slovak endangered weeds. In: Proceedings of Traditional Agroecosystems - 1st International Conference, Threatened Weedy Plant Species, Nitra, Slovakia, pp. 23-28.
13. Eliáš P, Hajnalová M, Eliášová M. 2010. Historical and current distribution of segetal weed Lolium temulentum L. in Slovakia. Hacquetia 9: 151-159.
14. Elsen T, Scheller U. 1995. Zur Bedeutung einer stark gegliederten Feldflur fü r Ackerwildkraut-Gesellschaften, Beispiele aus Thü ringen und Nordhessen. Natur und Landschaft 70: 62-72.
15. Faragó S. 1997. Élohelyfejlesztés az apróvad-gazdálkodásban [Habitat improvement in wildlife management]. Budapest, Hungary: Mez}ogazda Kiadó. p. 356.
16. Fried G, Petit S, Dessaint F, Reboud X. 2009. Arable weed decline in Northern France: Crop edges as refugia for weed conservation? Biol Conserv 142: 238-243.
17. Hilbig W, Bachthaler G. 1992. Wirtschaftsbedingte Veränderungen der Segetalvegetation in Deutschland im Zeitraum von 1950-1990 (Teile 1 und 2). Angewandte Botanik 66: 192-209.
18. Holzner W. 1978. Weed species and weed communities. Vegetatio 38: 13-20.
19. Hulina N. 2005. List of threatened weeds in the continental part of Croatia and their possible conservation. ACS 70: 37-42.
20. Hunyadi K, Béres I, Kazinczi G. 2000. Gyomnövények, gyomirtás, gyombiológia [Weed plants, weed control, weed biology]. Budapest, Hungary: Mezogazda Kiadó. p. 630.
21. Hyvönen T, Huusela-Veistola E. 2008. Arable weeds as indicators of agricultural intensity - a case study from Finland. Biol Conserv 141: 2857-2864.
22. Kazinczi G, Novák R, Pathy Zs, Béres I. 2008. Common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.): A review with special regards to the results in Hungary. III. Resistant biotypes, control methods and authority arrangements. Herbologia 9: 119-143.
23. Király G. 2007. Vörö s Lista. A magyarországi edényes flóra veszé lyeztetett fajai [Red List of the vascular flora of Hungary]. Sopron, Hungary: Saját kiadás. p. 73.
24. Király G. 2009. Ú j magyar fü vészkö nyv. Magyarország hajtásos növényei [New field guide of the vascular plants of Hungary]. Jó svafo, Hungary: Aggteleki Nemzeti Park Igazgatóság. p. 616.
25. Király G, Mesterházy A, Király A, Pinke G, Pál R. 2008. Auftreten von Nanocyperion-Arten in Westungarn - die Rolle der Feuchtäcker in ihrer Erhaltung. J Plant Dis Protect, 21: 413-418.
26. Kleijn D, Kohler F, Báldi A, Batáry P, Concepción ED, Clough Y, et al. 2009. On the relationship between farmland biodiversity and land-use intensity in Europe. Proc Roy Soc Lond B Biol Sci 276: 903-909.
27. Kornaś J. 1983. Man's impact upon the flora and vegetation in Central Europe. In: Holzner W, Werger M, Ikusima I, editors. Man's impact on vegetation. The Hague, Netherlands: Junk Publishers. pp. 277-286.
28. Kornaś J. 1988. Speirochore Ackerwildkräuter: von ö kologischer Spezialisierung zum Aussterben. Flora 180: 83-91.
29. Korneck D, Schnittler M, Vollmer I. 1996. Rote Liste gefährdeter Pflanzen Deutschlands. Schriftenreihe fü r Vegetationskunde 28: 21-187.
30. Kovács-Hostyánszki A, Batáry P, Báldi A, Harnos A. 2011. Interaction of local and landscape features in the conservation of Hungarian arable weed diversity. Appl Veg Sci 14: 40-48.
31. Komives T, Béres I, Reisinger P, Lehoczky E, Berke J, Tamás J, et al. 2006. A parlagf elleni integrált védekezés ú j stratégiai programja [New strategy of the integrated protection against common ragweed]. Magyar Gyomkutatás és Technológia 7:5-49.
32. Lososová Z, Chytrý M, Kühn I, Hájek O, Horáková V, Pyšek P, et al. 2006. Patterns of plant traits in annual vegetation of man-made habitats in Central Europe. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 8: 69-81.
33. Lososová Z, Simonová D. 2008. Changes during the 20th century in species composition of synanthropic vegetation in Moravia (Czech Republic). Preslia 80: 291-305.
34. Marshall EJP, Brown VK, Boatman ND, Lutman PJW, Squire GR, Ward LK. 2003. The role of weeds in supporting biological diversity within crop fields. Weed Res 43: 77-89.
35. Marshall EJP, West TM, Kleijn D. 2006. Impacts of agrienvironment field margin prescription on the flora and fauna of arable farmland in different landscapes. Agr Ecosyst Environ 113: 36-44.
36. Meyer S, Leuschner C, Van Elsen T. 2008. Schutzäcker fü r die Segetalflora in Deutschland - Bestandsanalyse und neue Impulse durch das Projekt "Biodiversität in der Agrarlandschaft". J Plant Dis Protect 21: 363-368.
37. Molnár A. 1997. Az öldöklo aszat (Cirsium furiens Gris. et Sch.) ú j term}ohelye Debrecen mellett [New habitat of Cirsium furiens in Hungary]. Kitaibelia 2: 84-86.
38. Moonen A, Barberi P. 2008. Functional biodiversity: An agroecosystem approach. Agr Ecosyst Environ 127: 7-21.
39. Naylor REL, Lutman PJ. 2002. What is a weed? In: Naylor REL, editor. Weed management handbook. Cronwall, UK: Blacwell Science. pp. 1-15.
40. Niklfeld H, Schratt-Ehrendorfer L. 1999. Farn- und Blü tenpflanzen. In: Niklfeld H, editor. Rote Listen gefährdeter Pflanzen Österreichs. Grüne Reihe des Bundesministeriums fü r Umwelt 10. Wien, Ö sterreich: Jugend und Familie. pp. 33-152.
41. Novák R, Dancza I, Szentey L, Karamán J. 2009. Arable weeds of Hungary. Fifth national weed survey (2007-2008). Budapest, Hungary: Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development. p. 95.
42. Pál R. 2006. A magyarországi sz}ol}ok ritka gyomnövényei [Rare weeds of Hungarian vineyards]. Acta Agronomica Ó váriensis 48: 127-135.
43. Pinke G. 1995. Ki{dotless}́sérlet a botanikai szempontbó l értékes gyomnö-vényeink ö sszei{dotless}́rására [An approach to list weed botanical values of Hungary]. Acta Agronomica Ó váriensis 37: 153-175.
44. Pinke G, Pál R. 2005. Gyomnövényeink eredete, term}ohelye és védelme [The origin, habitat and conservation of our arable weeds]. Pécs, Hungary: Alexandra Kiadó. p. 231.
45. Pinke G, Pál R. 2008. Phytosociological and conservational study of the arable weed communities in western Hungary. Plant Biosyst 142: 491-508.
46. Pinke G, Pál R. 2009. Floristic composition and conservation value of the stubble-field weed community, dominated by Stachys annua in western Hungary. Biologia 64: 279-291.
47. Pinke G, Pál R, Király G, Szendr}odi V, Mesterházy A. 2006a. The occurrence and habitat conditions of Anthoxanthum puelii Lecoq, Lamotte and other Atlantic-Mediterranean weed species in Hungary. J Plant Dis Protect 20: 587-596.
48. Pinke G, Pál R, Schmidt D, Dancza I, Farkas S, Nagy A. 2006b. A konkoly (Agrostemma githago L.) aktuális elterjedése Magyarországon [The current occurrence of Agrostemma githago in Hungary]. Magyar Gyomkutatás és Technológia 7: 63-81.
49. Pinke G, Pál R, Botta-Dukát Z, Chytrý M. 2009. Weed vegetation and its conservation value in three management systems of Hungarian winter cereals on base-rich soils. Weed Res 49: 544-551.
50. Pyšek P, Chocholoušková Z, Pyšek A, Jaroši{dotless}́k V, Chytrý M, Tichý L. 2004. Trends in species diversity and composition of urban vegetation over three decades. J Vegetation Sci 15: 781-788.
51. Pyšek P, Sádlo J, Mandák B. 2002. Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic. Preslia 74: 97-186.
52. Robinson R, Sutherland W. 2002. Post-war changes in arable farming and biodiversity in Great Britain. J Appl Ecol 39: 157-176.
53. Simon T. 2000. A magyarországi edényes fló ra határozó ja [Field guide of the vascular plants of Hungary]. Budapest, Hungary: Nemzeti Tankönyvkiadó. p. 976.
54. Soó R. 1964-1980. Synopsis systematico-geobotanica florae vegetationisque Hungariae I-VI. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. pp. 589, 655, 506, 614, 724, 557.
55. Stehlik I, Caspersen J, Wirth L, Holderegger R. 2007. Floral free fall in the Swiss lowlands: Environmental determinants of local plant extinction in a peri-urban landscape. J Ecol 95: 734-744.
56. Stoate C, Báldi A, Beja P, Boatman ND, Herzon I, van Doorn A, et al. 2009. Ecological impacts of early 21st century agricultural change in Europe - A review. J Environ Manage 91: 22-46.
57. Storkey J. 2006. A functional group approach to the management of UK arable weeds to support biological diversity. Weed Res 46: 513-522.
58. Storkey J, Westbury D. 2007. Managing arable weeds for biodiversity. Pest Manage Sci 43: 517-523.
59. Storkey J, Moss SR, Cussans JW. 2010. Using assembly theory to explain changes in a weed flora in response to agricultural intensification. Weed Sci 58: 39-46.
60. Terpó A, Zajac M, Zajac A. 1999. Provisional list of Hungarian archeophytes. Thaiszia 9: 41-47.
61. Türe C, Böcük H. 2008. Investigation of threatened arable weeds and their conservation status in Turkey. Weed Res 48: 289-296.
62. Ujvárosi M. 1973. Gyomnövények [Weeds]. Budapest, Hungary: Mez}ogazdasági Kiadó. p. 833.
63. Van Calster H, Vandenberghe R, Ruysen M, Verheyen K, Hermy M, Decocq G. 2008. Unexpectedly high 20th century floristic losses in a rural landscape in northern France. J Ecol 96: 927-936.
64. Walker KJ, Preston C. 2006. Ecological predictors of extinction risk in the flora of lowland England, UK. Biodivers Conserv 15: 1913-1942.
65. Walker KJ, Critchley CNR, Sherwood AJ, Large R, Nuttall P, Hulmes S, et al. 2007. The conservation of arable plants on cereal field margins: An assessment of new agri-environment scheme options in England, UK. Biol Conserv 136: 260-270.
66. Wilson P, Aebischer N. 1995. The distribution of dicotyledonous arable weeds in relation to distance from the field edge. J Appl Ecol 32: 295-310.
67. Wittig R. 2002. Siedlungsvegetation. Stuttgart, Germany: Verlag Eugen Ulmer. p. 252.