A common basis for analysis, evaluation and comparison of offstream water uses

Water International

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 266-282

  Frederiksen, Harald Dixen ^a   Allen, Richard Glen ^b  

^a University of Idaho ^*

^b UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

Author keywords

Analyses; Consumptive; Return flow; Water management; Water uses

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960679993     PISSN: 02508060     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02508060.2011.580449     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Burt, C.M., et al. 2002. Evaporation from irrigated agricultural land in California [online]. Report No. 02-001. Available from: http://works.bepress.com/cburt/45 [Accessed 4 April 2011].
2. California Department of Water Resources, 1991. Governor's emergency drought water bank. Sacramento: Department of Water Resources (DWR).
3. California Department of Water Resources, 1994. California water plan update. Bulletin 160-193. Sacramento: Department of Water Resources (DWR).
4. California Department of Water Resources, 1995. Monterey Agreement [online]. Available from: www.water.ca.gov/ [Accessed 5 April 2011]. Sacramento: Department of Water Resources (DWR).
5. California Department of Water Resources, 2009a. California Water Plan 2009. vol. 4. Sacramento: Department of Water Resources (DWR).
6. California Department of Water Resources, 2009b. Reference guide. 'Crop water use.' Item 6, 'Definition of Agr. and Urban Applied Water Use.' vol. 4., p. 2. Sacramento: Department of Water Resources (DWR).
7. California Department of Water Resources, 2009c. vol. 2, box 2-5, pp. 2-14. Sacramento: Department of Water Resources (DWR).
8. California Department of Water Resources, 2009d, vol. 2, pp. 2-17. Sacramento: Department of Water Resources (DWR).
9. Clemens, A.J., et al., 2008. Technical concepts related to conservation of irrigation and rainwater in agricultural systems. Water Resources Research, 44, DOI: 10.1029/2007/WR006095.
10. McKinsey and Co., 2009. Charting our water future [online]. Available from: www.mckinsey.com/clientservice/water/charting_our_water_future.aspx [Accessed 9 April 2011].
11. Pacific Institute, 2010. California's next million acre-feet: saving water, energy and money. Oakland, CA: Pacific Institute.
12. State of Colorado Statutes, n.d. District Court procedures for water rights hearings. Denver: State of Colorado.
13. United States Geological Survey, 1988. Estimated use of water in the United States in 1985. USGS Circular 1004. Reston, VA: USGS, DOI, Fig 21.
14. United States Geological Survey, 1993. Estimated use of water in the United States in 1990. USGS Circular 1081. Reston, VA: USGS, DOI, Fig. 7.
15. United States Geological Survey, 2004. Estimated use of water in the United States in 2000. USGS Circular 1268. Reston, VA: USGS ODOI.
16. United States Geological Survey, 2009. Groundwater availability of the Central Valley Aquifer, California. Professional Paper 1766. Reston, VA: USGS DOI.
17. Wichelns, D., 2010a. Virtual water and water footprints offer limited insight regarding important policy questions. Colombo: International Water Management Institute.
18. Wichelns, D., 2010b. An economic analysis of the virtual water concept in relation to the agri-food sector. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
19. th Technical Conference. United States Committee on Irrigation and Drainage, 1994. Denver, CO: United States Committee on Irrigation and Drainage.