The effects of autocorrelation on the curve-of-factors growth model

Structural Equation Modeling

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 430-448

  Murphy, Daniel L ^a   Beretvas, S Natasha ^b   Pituch, Keenan A ^b  

^a PEARSON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

Autoregression; Autoregressive latent trajectory model; Curve of factors model; Latent growth curve model; Structural equation modeling

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960671848     PISSN: 10705511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2011.582399     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Bast, J., & Reitsma, P. (1997). Matthew effects in reading: A comparison of latent growth curve models with structured means. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(2), 135-167.
2. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
3. Bollen, K. A. (2004). Latent curve models: A structural equation perspective. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
4. Bollen, K. A., & Curran, P. J. (2004). Autoregressive latent trajectory (ALT) models: A synthesis of two traditions. Sociological Methods & Research, 32(3), 336-383.
5. Boomsma, A. (1985). Nonconvergence, improper solutions, and starting values in Lisrel maximum likelihood estimation. Psychometrika, 50(2), 229-242.
6. Box, G. E., & Jenkins, G. M. (1976). Time-series analysis: Forecasting and control. San Francisco, CA: Holden-Day.
7. Chatfield, C. (2004). The analysis of time series: An introduction (6th ed.). London, UK: Chapman & Hall.
8. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Academic Press.
9. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
10. Curran, P. J. (2000). A latent curve framework for studying developmental trajectories of adolescent substance abuse. In J. Rose, L. Chassin, C. Presson, & J. Sherman (Eds.), Multivariate applications in substance use research (pp. 1-42). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Curran, P. J., & Bollen, K. A. (2001). The best of both worlds: Combining autoregressive and latent curve models. In L. M. Collins & A. G. Sayer (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 107-135). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
12. Fan, X., Felsövályi, A., Sivo, S. A., & Keenan, S. C. (2001). SAS for Monte Carlo studies: A guide for quantitative researchers. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
13. Ferron, J., Dailey, R., & Yi, Q. (2002). Effects of misspecifying the first-level error structure in two-level models of change. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 37, 379-403.
14. Guttman, L. (1954). A new approach to factor analysis: The radix. In P. F. Lazarfeld (Ed.), Mathematical thinking in the social sciences (pp. 258-348). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
15. Hamaker, E. (2005). Conditions for the equivalence of the autoregressive latent trajectory model and a latent growth model with autoregressive disturbances. Sociological Methods & Research, 33, 404-416.
16. Hamaker, E., Dolan, C., & Molenaar, P. (2002). On the nature of SEM estimates of ARMA parameters. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 347-368.
17. Hancock, G. R., Kuo, W., & Lawrence, F. R. (2001). An illustration of second-order latent growth models. Structural Equation Modeling, 8(3), 470-489.
18. Hauck, W. W., & Anderson, S. (1984). A survey regarding the reporting of simulation studies. American Statistician, 38, 214-216.
19. Hoogland, J. J., & Boomsma, A. (1998). Robustness studies in covariance structure modeling. Sociological Methods and Research, 26(3), 329-367.
20. Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
21. Kenny, D. A., & Campbell, D. T. (1989). On the measurement of stability in over-time data. Journal of Personality, 57, 445-481.
22. Krull, J. L., & MacKinnon, D. P. (1999). Multilevel mediation modeling in group-based intervention studies. Evaluation Review, 23, 418-444.
23. Kwok, O.-M., West, S. G., & Green, S. B. (2007). The impact of misspecifying the within-subject covariance structure in multiwave longitudinal multilevel models: A Monte Carlo study. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 557-592.
24. Leite, W. L. (2007). A comparison of latent growth models for constructs measured by multiple items. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 581-610.
25. Marsh, H. W. (1993). Stability of individual differences in multiwave panel studies: Comparison of simplex models and one-factor models. Journal of Educational Measurement, 30, 157-183.
26. McArdle, J. J. (1988). Dynamic but structural equation modeling of repeated measures data. In J. R. Nesselroade & R. B. Cattell (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 561-614). New York, NY: Plenum.
27. McArdle, J. J., & Aber, M. S. (1990). Patterns of change within latent variable structural equation models. In A. von Eye (Ed.), Statistical methods in longitudinal research (Vol. I, pp. 151-224). Boston, MA: Academic Press.
28. Meredith, W., & Tisak, J. (1990). Latent curve analysis. Psychometrika, 55, 107-122.
29. Murphy, D. L., & Pituch, K. A. (2009). The performance of multilevel growth curve models under an autoregressive moving average process. The Journal of Experimental Education, 77, 255-282.
30. Olejnik, S., & Algina, J. (2000). Measures of effect size for comparative studies: Applications, interpretations, and limitations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 241-286.
31. Rogosa, D., & Willett, J. B. (1985). Satisfying simplex structure is simpler than it should be. Journal of Educational Statistics, 10, 99-107.
32. Rovine, M. J., & Molenaar, P. C. M. (2005). Relating factor models for longitudinal data to quasi-simplex and NARMA models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40(1), 83-114.
33. SAS Institute. (2005). SAS (version 9.1) [Computer software]. Cary, NC: Author.
34. Sayer, A. G., & Cumsille, P. E. (2001). Second-order latent growth models. In L. M. Collins & A. G. Sayer (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 179-200). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
35. Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
36. Sivo, S. A. (2001). Multiple indicator stationary time series models. Structural Equation Modeling, 8(4), 599-612.
37. Sivo, S. A., Fan, X., & Witta, L. (2005). The biasing effects of unmodeled ARMA time series processes on latent growth curve model estimates. Structural Equation Modeling, 12(2), 215-231.
38. Sivo, S. A., & Willson, V. L. (2000). Modeling causal error structures in longitudinal panel data: A Monte Carlo study. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 174-205.
39. Stoolmiller, M. (1995). Using latent growth curve models to study developmental processes. In J. M. Gottman (Ed.), The analysis of change (pp. 103-138). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
40. Tisak, J., & Meredith, W. (1990). Descriptive and associative developmental models. In A. von Eye (Ed.), Statistical methods in longitudinal research (Vol. 2, pp. 387-406). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
41. van Buuren, S. (1997). Fitting ARMA time series by structural equation models. Psychometrika, 62, 215-236.
42. Wothke, W. (1993). Nonpositive definite matrices in structural equation modeling. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 256-293). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.